Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,479,661 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : EVIL EMPIRE OUTRAGE METER 8.


LAUSD's culture of secrecy and lying operates like Darth Vader's Evil Empire: everything's darkly veiled and sinister.

It's also hard to know who controls LAUSD's byzantine bureaucracy when everyone hides behind a mask.

But one thing is certain: LAUSD bureaucrats would rather die at the stake than tell the truth.

On Wednesday, their well-established pattern of deceit and trickery was repeated in West Hills, this time at Haynes Street Elementary School, a school scheduled to reopen this fall after white flight forced its closure 15 years ago.

Parents were told that each child's name for the 75 coveted open-enrollment seats would be drawn out of the same box.

They then watched incredulously when well-respected Principal Usafi Diamond separated the names; one box for minority children, one box for white children.

Unsure of how to deal with the open enrollment open enrollment, a policy of admitting to college all high-school graduates in an effort to provide a higher education for all who desire it. To critics it means an inevitable lowering of standards as a considerable effort must be devoted to development of basic skills. The most ambitious programs of open enrollment in the United States have been undertaken in California and New York City. situation, Diamond sought guidance from Los Angeles Unified School District administrators. Their instruction: fix the lottery so that all the children of the minority families get in while the 13 white families who never stood a chance were placed on a waiting list.

Apparently, the district has two policies on open enrollment. One public, fair and ignored. One secret, treacherous and skewed.

The published policy states: ``If the number of applicants exceeds the number of available spaces, a random, unbiased selection process shall be used.''

And then there's a secret policy that overrides the published policy, giving the principal authority to use open enrollment to ``enhance the integration status.''

So open enrollment is a sham.

The district's real goal - no doubt hashed out by the board behind closed doors in defiance of the Brown Act - is hidden.

State Sen. Deirdre Alpert, D-San Diego, author of the state's 4-year-old open-enrollment law, said that fixing the lottery violates the spirit of the measure and may be illegal.

The state Department of Education, in a legal summary, advised districts to administer the law in a ``random and unbiased'' manner, but added that ``racial and ethnic balance issues also apply.''

After 20 years, since the 1980s when busing for racial integration triggered an exodus to private schools and forced the closure of Haynes, the district still cannot deal with race and preferences in a fair and upfront manner.

Twenty years ago the community fought to save the neighborhood school system. But the LAUSD destroyed it and chased people away. Now, the district in its desperation is reviving the neighborhood school system and still chasing people away with its culture of lying and deceit.

It's time to drive a stake through the heart of this evil empire. It's time to open the doors and windows of our schools to the light of truth and honesty.

Parents, students and the community as a whole support integrated, well-balanced schools that provide a healthy educational environment and help every child to succeed. The LAUSD is not capable of achieving that.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jun 5, 1998
Words:481
Previous Article:EDITORIAL : NOMO HAD TO GO.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:CAR TAX UNFAIRLY BURDENS STATE'S MOTORISTS.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
Reagan's Soviet speech.
Satanic force v. evil empire. (communism v.national socialism)
D'Souza on the job. (Dinesh D'Souza's forthcoming article in Policy Review)
How sad that editorials need defending.(The Masthead Symposium: The Future)
Quality of discourse endures. (journalists and professional ethics)
Good out of evil: a controversial editorial.
Good writing requires variety, seasoning.
Commentary in 'extras' and then some. (Sept11 How members responded).
Censorship, or legitimate church discipline, at Baylor University?(Pro Con)
A lesson in humility, category five level: an ode to the value of preparation ... and prudence.(SYMPOSIUM: Editorializing in the face of disaster)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles