Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,610,896 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : 2 DANGEROUS INITIATIVES.


THE initiative with the most misleading title on the November ballot is what its sponsors call the ``Frivolous Of minimal importance; legally worthless.

A frivolous suit is one without any legal merit. In some cases, such an action might be brought in bad faith for the purpose of harrassing the defendant.
 Lawsuit Limitation Act,'' otherwise known as Proposition 207. Actually, Proposition 207 would make it more difficult to discourage frivolous lawsuits.

A close runner-up in the deception derby is the ``Retirement Savings and Consumer Protection Act,'' or Proposition 211. In reality, the primary beneficiaries of this initiative would be attorneys - not consumers or people with money in retirement funds - who specialize in filing shareholder suits that often are thinly disguised legal shakedowns. These lawsuits actually can be counterproductive coun·ter·pro·duc·tive  
adj.
Tending to hinder rather than serve one's purpose: "Violation of the court order would be counterproductive" Philip H. Lee.
 in that they may damage healthy companies that retirement funds have invested in.

Some of the sponsors of these measures successfully opposed two tort-reform initiatives on the March primary election ballot that would have placed reasonable restrictions on attorneys' fees (Proposition 202) and required the losing party to pay the other side's legal bills in shareholder suits and class actions dealing with securities violations (Proposition 201). The campaigns against those tort-reform measures were outrageously deceptive de·cep·tive  
adj.
Deceptive or tending to deceive.



de·ceptive·ness n.
 even by California standards.

Now these masters of deceit Deceit
Aimwell

pretends to be titled to wed into wealth. [Br. Lit.: The Beaux’ Stratagem]

Ananias

lies about amount of money received for land. [N.T.: Acts 5:1–6]

Ananias Club

all its members are liars. [Am.
 are trying to carry their March victories even further by persuading the voters to approve initiatives that in effect would make it impossible for the Legislature to deal with the often outrageous fees charged by lawyers. This is special-interest legislation at its worst.

And in the case of Proposition 211, trial lawyers also are trying to dilute di·lute
v.
To reduce a solution or mixture in concentration, quality, strength, or purity, as by adding water.

adj.
Thinned or weakened by diluting.
 the impact of a recent federal tort reform law by making it easier to litigate frivolous securities cases in California courts. Proposition 211 would make California businesses, especially high-tech industries whose stocks often fluctuate wildly, especially vulnerable.

Propositions 207 and 211 are bad enough individually. Together, they add up to a double whammy double whammy
Noun

informal a devastating setback made up of two elements

double whammy n (col) → palo doble

double whammy n (inf
 for California jobs and the state's economy - and the nest eggs Nest Egg

A special sum of money saved or invested for one specific future purpose.

Notes:
Examples of the purposes for which nest eggs are usually intended include retirement, education, and even entertainment (vacations and cruises).
 of current and future pensioners.

PROP. 207 AT A GLANCE

Here is a summary of Proposition 207 on the statewide ballot Nov. 5:

Attorneys' fees: Would prohibit new restrictions on the right to negotiate the amount of attorneys' fees; prohibit attorneys from charging or collecting excessive fees by enacting into law existing State Bar regulations; requires courts to impose sanctions on attorneys who file frivolous lawsuits.

The Daily News recommends: NO

PROP. 211 AT A GLANCE

Here is a summary of Proposition 211:

Securities fraud: Would prohibit new restrictions on attorney-client fee arrangements; prohibit deceptive conduct in securities transactions resulting in losses to pensions, savings and retirement funds; adds a presumption A conclusion made as to the existence or nonexistence of a fact that must be drawn from other evidence that is admitted and proven to be true. A Rule of Law.

If certain facts are established, a judge or jury must assume another fact that the law recognizes as a logical
 that fraudulent acts affected market values of a security; shifts the burden of proof to those accused of securities fraud; prohibits indemnification Indemnification

Used in insurance policy agreements as to compensation for damage or loss. In the context of corporate governance, Director Indemnification uses the bylaws and/or charter to indemnify officers and directors from certain legal expenses and judgements resulting from
 of officers found liable for fraudulent acts.

The Daily News recommends: NO.

CAPTION(S):

2 Boxes

Box: (1) PROP. 207 AT A GLANCE (SEE TEXT)

(2) PROP. 211 A T A GLANCE (SEE TEXT)
COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Sep 26, 1996
Words:467
Previous Article:EDITORIAL : EDIFICE COMPLEX.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
Next Article:PUBLIC FORUM : STATE FACES HUGE LOSSES IF `SMOG II' IS SHELVED.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
We gained great hindsight from board's demise.(The Masthead Symposium: Advising the Editorial Page)
Don Gale logs 1,235,000th word. (KSL radio and television station's editorial writer)(includes related article)
The 'NCR' accuses; our editor responds. (National Catholic Reporter criticizes the Catholic Common Ground Initiative for preventing media coverage of...
Competence can be taught, but not greatness.(Can Editorial Writing Be Taught?)
Farm Progress Companies. (At Closing People).(Brief Article)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
From Paul Kokoski.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles