Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,604,530 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EAVESDROPPING FEARS CAN POISON WORKPLACE TRUST.


Byline: Ken Lloyd On The Job

Q. We believe that our employer is using sophisticated listening devices to eavesdrop eaves·drop  
intr.v. eaves·dropped, eaves·drop·ping, eaves·drops
To listen secretly to the private conversation of others.
 on our conversations, as our supervisor has given clues regarding subjects we have talked about? Is this legal? B.H.

A. The answer is the proverbial pro·ver·bi·al  
adj.
1. Of the nature of a proverb.

2. Expressed in a proverb.

3. Widely referred to, as if the subject of a proverb; famous.
 ``it all depends.'' If your employer is secretly monitoring communications between you and your fellow employees, and at this point this is a very big ``if,'' such actions may arguably ar·gu·a·ble  
adj.
1. Open to argument: an arguable question, still unresolved.

2. That can be argued plausibly; defensible in argument: three arguable points of law.
 be illegal. The key word here is ``arguably.'' While employees have a right to privacy, employers have rights, too, and much of what they are permitted to do depends on the kind of surveillance and upon language in your company manual.

Before playing the lawyer card, there are a few points to consider first. For example, the fact is that you do not really know if your employer is spying spying: see espionage.
Spying
Birch, Harvey

a double spy, secretly in the employ of George Washington. [Am. Lit.: Cooper The Spy]

Bond, James

Agent 007: super spy, super hero. [Br. Lit.: Herman, 27]

C.I.
 on you at all. It is possible that your supervisor may be friends with one of your co-workers, or may have strolled by your department and overheard a few choice comments, or perhaps this supervisor is just a good guesser. Your supervisor seems to know too much about private communications in your department, but you don't know Don't know (DK, DKed)

"Don't know the trade." A Street expression used whenever one party lacks knowledge of a trade or receives conflicting instructions from the other party.
 where the information was gathered.

The real issue is that you are in a troublesome work environment, whether you are being spied spied  
v.
Past tense and past participle of spy.
 upon or not. If your supervisor is actually using some sort of secretive se·cre·tive  
adj.
Having or marked by an inclination to secrecy; not open, forthright, or frank. See Synonyms at silent.



se
 listening device to eavesdrop on you and your co-workers, this means that you are working in an organization void of mutual trust and respect. And, if your supervisor is not eavesdropping Secretly gaining unauthorized access to confidential communications. Examples include listening to radio transmissions or using laser interferometers to reconstitute conversations by reflecting laser beams off windows that are vibrating in synchrony to the sound in the room.  on you, the fact that you and your fellow employees could even think that you are being spied upon also indicates that you are not in an organization of mutual trust and respect.

When employees think their supervisor is spying upon them, regardless of whether such surreptitious SURREPTITIOUS. That which is done in a fraudulent stealthy manner.  activity is really occurring, it is a clear sign that the working relationship has stopped working. For an organization to succeed, and for the employees to succeed with it, there is a need for a strong shared sense of honesty, openness and respect. In this regard, every action by a supervisor sends a message to the employees. Rather than spend time wondering whether your supervisor is secretly listening to the messages you send, you should spend more time listening to the messages your supervisor is sending.

Q. I was at a meeting that was run by one of the senior managers in our company. His new secretary attended and was supposed to take notes, but she made more comments and asked more questions that most of us. Does this sound right to you? E.S.

A. The first question for you to answer is whether this secretary's participation in the management meeting is a problem, or whether you have a problem with a secretary participating in a management meeting. On the surface, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a secretary participating in a management meeting. In fact, the argument can be made that this is part of effective management.

The secretary's performance in the meeting should be judged by the same criteria that you would apply to all others in attendance. If anyone at the meeting goes into a hyperverbal mode, then there can be real questions about having that person present, regardless of title.

At the same time, if any reasonable person could conclude that her behavior seems to indicate that she is permanently out to lunch, then it's time It's Time was a successful political campaign run by the Australian Labor Party (ALP) under Gough Whitlam at the 1972 election in Australia. Campaigning on the perceived need for change after 23 years of conservative (Liberal Party of Australia) government, Labor put forward a  to discuss the situation with the senior manager.

Your approach with the manager should be to focus on the secretary's specific actions that you believe have undermined the effectiveness and productivity of the meetings and the management team. While it is not your job to establish plans and objectives for your manager's secretary, you can provide your manager with some valuable performance data that he can use in helping this employee succeed. Your comments can pinpoint some areas where the secretary's skill mix and knowledge base may need some work, and they can also help identify some specific behaviors that may need some adjustment. By taking this approach, it will not take long to see if she really belongs at the management meetings.

MEMO MEMO Memorandum
MEMO Medicines Monitoring Unit (University of Dundee)
MEMO Medical Equipment Management Office
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Only
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Operations
MEMO Mental Modeler
: Ken Lloyd, Ph.D., is a specialist in organizational behavior. Questions can be sent by electronic mail to LloydOnJobaol.com, or they can be mailed to P.O. Box 260057, Encino, Calif. 91426. Names will be withheld upon request.
COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
carrieju
carrie juska (Member): my boss is listening in.... 2/21/2010 1:34 PM
my store manager came into work the other day with a hearing device in her ear. this was much to our surprise and disgust, as the device is not a hearing aid, and she is not hard of hearing at all. this device is specifically designed to pick up conversations from a distance, so she is using it to listen in on our conversations. is this legal, especially in light of the fact that my manager does not have a hearing problem? if she does listen in on a converstion she doesn't like can she use it against any of us? she states she is using the device for training purposes as we are in sales and converstion is an important part of our jobs. we all know this is not trur]e, do we have any rights as far as this is concerned?
thanks for your help....

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:BUSINESS
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Jul 7, 1996
Words:749
Previous Article:ELEVATOR MUSIC HITS A FLAT NOTE WITH INVESTORS.
Next Article:L.A. COUNCIL EXAMINES TWIN PROPOSALS THAT WOULD MAKE HOME BUSINESSES LEGAL.



Related Articles
Little-noticed law lurks over environmental protections.
MANAGER NEEDS TO ENFORCE RESPECT FOR WAITRESSES.
TEAM CRACKS KEY TO PRIVACY CODE ON DIGITAL PHONES.
JAPANESE FIGHT E. COLI EPIDEMIC IN SCHOOLS.
Seals discern foes' from neighbor-whales' calls. (Ear for Killers).
E-privacy: snoop out problems using your company's e-mail.
Poisons.
Suing the spooks: NSA wiretap blowback.
Let high court decide.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles