Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,528,975 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Dueling discriminations.


CAN A HANDSHAKE be grounds for a lawsuit? Perhaps, under a European Union European Union (EU), name given since the ratification (Nov., 1993) of the Treaty of European Union, or Maastricht Treaty, to the

European Community
 directive passed in 2000 requiring member states to crack down on workplace discrimination on the basis of gender, sexual orientation sexual orientation
n.
The direction of one's sexual interest toward members of the same, opposite, or both sexes, especially a direction seen to be dictated by physiologic rather than sociologic forces.
, and religion. The United Kingdom passed legislation prohibiting religious discrimination earlier this year, with provisions set to take effect in December. But a report by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) is the leading professional body for those involved in the field of personnel, training and development. Membership of the CIPD is highly respected and widely accepted by employers as a requirement of practice.  (CIPD CIPD Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (UK)
CIPD Conferencia Internacional sobre la Población y el Desarrollo (Mexico)
CIPD Center for Innovation in Product Development
), a professional association for managers, raises the specter of dueling discrimination lawsuits pitting religions and gender discrimination claims against each other.

As an example of a possible conflict, imagine a man whose religious beliefs prohibit contact with women. Does his refusal to shake hands to perform the customary act of civility by clasping and moving hands, as an expression of greeting, farewell, good will, agreement, etc.

See also: Shake
 with female colleagues constitute gender discrimination? Or is it religious discrimination if his female superiors take offense? Under the new legislation, it's not clear, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 Dianah Worman, head of diversity for CIPD. "The point of the directive wasn't to make one type of discrimination more important than the other," Worman says. "The intention isn't a pecking order.... We'll have to wait until it all comes out. The courts will be the testing ground."

In the next few months, employers will be considering the legal implications of having alcohol at work functions and the logistics of allowing employees time for prayer. The legal muddle is due to get cloudier still in 2006,when E.U. members must add a prohibition on age discrimination to the mix.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Religion vs. gender
Author:Alembakis, Rachel
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2003
Words:236
Previous Article:25 years ago in reason.(Citings)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Time enough for love.(Heinlein's new oldie)
Topics:



Related Articles
Unequal justice for all: EEOC director fighting a rising tide. (Gilbert Casellas receives thousands of complaints at the Equal Employment Opportunity...
POLITICS AND THE TECHNOLOGY OF HONOR: DUELING IN TURN-OF-THE-CENTURY MEXICO.
U.S. District Court: TERMINATION DISCRIMINATION.(Brief Article)
Upfront QUIZ 1.(quiz on sex differences in education and employment)(Brief Article)
States not immune from Family and Medical Leave Act liability, Ninth Circuit rules.
Employment discrimination ruling carries many lessons.(Human Resources)
Pre-hire pregnancy screening in Mexico's maquiladoras: is it discrimination?
Litigation packets guide bad-faith, pharmaceutical, and discrimination cases.
Introducing an equal opportunities policy.(Checklist 062)
Facial discrimination: Darlene Jespersen's fight against the Barbie-fication of bartenders.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles