Printer Friendly

Drug 'nukes' ovarian cancer.

Drug "nukes' ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer strikes some 19,000 U.S. women eacy year,ultimately killing almost three out of five of them--or about twice as many of its victims, proportionately, as breast cancer. Now researchers at the University of Chicago and Argonne (Ill.) National Laboratory have teamed up to tackle ovarian cancer with a new radioactive drug. Though tests are very preliminary, the drug appears to hold great promise of fighting this and estrogen-dependent cancers.

Cancers of the ovaries, breast, cervix and uterus frequentlyinvolve cells that have many hundreds or thousands of estrogen-receptor sites. Because most of these cancers also require estrogen for growth, postsurgical treatment to seek out and destroy metastatic disease (minute secondary tumors spawned by the original cancer) usually involves endorcrine therapy--starving these cancers of estrogen or providing a drug that counteracts the effects of estrogen.

Ovarian cancers, notes Eugene DeSombre of the Universityof Chicago, are the exception. Though roughtly half carry estrogen receptors that in fact bind with estrogen, these cancers apparently do not need or use the estrogen and therefore "have not responded at all well to any endocrine therapy.' But a new estrogen treatment he is investigating shows promise of hunting down and killing metastasized ovarian cancers despite this limitation, he says.

The treatment employs an estrogen or estrogen-like drug towhich a form of radioactive bromine (Br-80m) has been attached. Since estrogen receptors are "very tightly associated with DNA,' DeSombre explains, when the drug binds to a cell it locks in the bromine very close to its genetic material. As the bromine decays, its locally deposited Auger-electron radiation (SN: 2/22/86, p.124) destroys the cell's DNA.

Micrographs picturing the drug's damage to cells grown inculture show "very dramatic' results, DeSombre says: "The cells look like they've had a miniature atom blast in the middle of them.' Moreover, he told SCIENCE NEWS, because each cell suffers so many DNA breaks, "we're confident that they would not be able to recover.'

Though the drug might also harm normal ovarian tissue, inmost cases surgery for the primary tumor would have removed the ovaries prior to treatment, he says. And because most other tissues reached by the drug would have far fewer estrogen receptors per cell than the cancers, DeSombre says, they should be much less vulnerable to the drug.

The drug, shown to work in cultured cells, is expected toundergo animal testing soon. If all goes well, human trials could get under way in as little as three years.
COPYRIGHT 1987 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1987, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Raloff, Janet
Publication:Science News
Date:Jun 20, 1987
Words:416
Previous Article:What's in the cards for manic-depression?
Next Article:Further findings on flare phenomena.
Topics:


Related Articles
Softening the bald facts of chemotherapy.
New anticancer strategy targets gene.
Yew needles join the cancer battle.
Ovarian cancer: homing in on the true risks.
Yew drugs show their mettle.
Yew drug fights cancer.
Gynecologic cancers & women's health.
Old idea fights ovarian cancer.
OBITUARIES.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters