Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,634,758 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Dowty v. Tarrell.


U.S. District Court

DELAY IN CARE

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE

Dowty v. Tarrell, 368 F.Supp.2d 1024 (D.S D.S Drainage Structure (flood protection) .D. 2005). A county jail inmate who was allegedly injured in·jure  
tr.v. in·jured, in·jur·ing, in·jures
1. To cause physical harm to; hurt.

2. To cause damage to; impair.

3.
 when he fell in the jail's shower brought an action against a county and county officials, alleging negligence and violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The court held that a four-day delay in obtaining treatment for the inmate after he fell in the shower did not amount to deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, where there was no evidence that the inmate suffered bruises Bruises Definition

Bruises, or ecchymoses, are a discoloration and tenderness of the skin or mucous membranes due to the leakage of blood from an injured blood vessel into the tissues. Pupura refers to bruising as the result of a disease condition.
 or cuts during the alleged fall, nor any other symptoms of trauma. (Fall River County Jail, South Dakota South Dakota (dəkō`tə), state in the N central United States. It is bordered by North Dakota (N), Minnesota and Iowa (E), Nebraska (S), and Wyoming and Montana (W). )
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Dowty v. Tarrell, 368 F.Supp.2d 1024
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U4SD
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:123
Previous Article:Carter v. Fagin.(Carter v. Fagin, 363 F.Supp.2d 661)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Estate of Carter v. City of Detroit.(Estate of Carter v. City of Detroit, 408 F.3d 305)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Koger v. Snyder.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(searches and seizures lawsuit)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(searches and seizures)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(TRANSFERS)(Brief Article)
Borzych v. Frank.(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
King v. Frank.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)
Discipline.
False imprisonment/arrest.
Thomsen v. Ross.(Thomsen v. Ross, 368 F.Supp.2d 961)(Brief Article)
Lindell v. Casperson.(RULES & REGULATIONS-PRISONER)(violation of Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles