Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,488,626 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Double taxation of dividends?


In exposing the falsity of the claim of "double taxation
Double taxation
Government taxation of the same money twice; specifically, earnings taxed first at the corporate level and then again as dividends at the stockholder level.
 of dividends," one may note that such a claim is on its face literally unsupportable since there is absolutely no evidence in the federal tax codes that dividends are taxed twice to the same taxpayer.

And, if these codes do not provide for double taxation of dividends, the claim must evaporate as a stated reality and have no plausible life except, possibly as a semantic mirage from the world of economic theory.

The vague view, often advanced as support for the double tax claim, is that because a corporation pays income taxes on its net profits and later a shareholder of that corporation pays income taxes on any dividends received from those profits, a kind of double taxation exists. But this view fades into nullity nullity n. something which may be treated as nothing, as if it did not exist or never happened. This can occur by court ruling or enactment of a statute. The most common example is a nullity of a marriage by a court judgment. when one examines the numerous facts that expose its lack of substance. To name a few:

1. The corporation and any one shareholder are established in law as different taxable entities, subject to different tax rates and regulations, having different kinds of revenue and costs and serving entirely different operational functions;

2. Many corporations never declare dividends, so for these corporations there are no dividends to be taxed twice;

3. Through the judicious use of offshore tax sites and special corporate allowances many corporations pay no income taxes at all on their earnings (60 percent according to a recent Wall Street Journal report) and hence for this large percentage of corporations one-half of the claimed double taxation couldn't occur; and

4. All taxable income is repeatedly taxed to taxpayers as it flows through the economy, but no one taxpayer (whether a corporation or a shareholder) pays taxes twice on the same income, be it from dividends or other sources. For example, if I pay a plumber from my after-tax funds to unclog a pipe, he cannot claim that he is being double taxed when he pays taxes on his receipts because I have previously paid taxes on the funds from which I paid him.

As one examines the apparent assumptions underlying the "double taxation of dividends" claim, it's clear that there is no real basis in fact for such a claim and it is much more a figment of conventional wisdom than an accounting or legal fact.

A forum for your comments, suggestions and reactions. Fire off your succinct missive to: editor@calcpa.org.

William McNairn, CPA (retired)

Palos Verdes Peninsula
COPYRIGHT 2004 California Society of Certified Public Accountants
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Speak Out
Author:McNairn, William
Publication:California CPA
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2004
Words:406
Previous Article:Find A CPA.(WebFocus)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Estate Planning Forum: timing the termination of an estate.(News & Trends)
Topics:



Related Articles
EC tax commissioner sets priorities. (Christiane Scrivener)
Prospering in the European Community: three EC initiative to ensure it. (Special Report: International)
Eliminate the double tax on dividends.
Green taxes: can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time?
The questionable constitutionality of the California DRD and interest offset rules. (dividends-received deductions)
California insurance company DRD provision ruled unconstitutional. (dividends-received deduction)
Editorial: TAXES: Going for Growth.(Editorial)
Can you spare a dividend? Bush's tax-break proposal has ignited a debate over how companies use excess cash. (Finance).
Time to distribute corporate earnings? Taking advantage of the lower tax rate on dividends received. (from The Tax Adviser)
Double tax of dividends.(Speak Out)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles