Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,536,229 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Donhauser v. Goord.


U.S. District Court

GOOD TIME CREDIT

Donhauser v. Goord, 314 F.Supp.2d 119 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). A state inmate brought a pro se [section] 1983 action alleging violations of his privilege against self-incrimination privilege against self-incrimination self-incrimination n. making statements or producing evidence which tends to prove that one is guilty of a crime. The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that one cannot "be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself..." and the 14th Amendment applies that guarantee to state cases. Thus refusing to testify in court on the basis that the testimony may be self-incriminating is called "taking the Fifth. n. a right to refuse to testify against oneself in a criminal prosecution or in any legal proceeding which might be used against the person. This privilege is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution which provides: "No person....shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself..., due process, equal protection, and privacy rights. The district court held that requiring the inmate, as part of a sexual offender counseling program, to divulge his history of sexual conduct violates the inmate's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination because the inmate faced a loss of good time credit if he refused to divulge his history. The court found that officials were entitled to qualified immunity from monetary damages on the inmate's Fifth Amendment claim because the standard defining the inmate's right to be free from compelled self-incrimination was not clearly established at the time. (Oneida Oneida Community, a religious society of Perfectionists that was established (1848) by John Humphrey Noyes. Members of the sect held all property in common and practiced complex marriage and common care of the children. The community prospered by making steel traps and silverware. In 1881 it was reorganized as a joint stock company, and the social experiments were abandoned.

Bibliography



See C. N. Robertson, ed., Oneida Community (1981).
 Correctional Facility, New York)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoner broughts violations of his due process, equal protection, and privacy rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:136
Previous Article:Ortiz v. Fort Dodge Correctional Facility.(prisoner challenges a policy which prohibits him from writing letters to family members in Spanish)(Brief...
Next Article:Chavis v. Struebel.(prisoner alleges prison officials of retaliation)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: RIGHT TO PRIVACY.(Brief Article)
Oliver v. Scott.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Brief Article)
Oliver v. Scott.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Abney v. Alameida.(violation of United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)
Abney v. Alameida.(ADMINISTRATION)(Brief Article)
Giano v. Goord.(violation of privacy rights)(Brief Article)
Boddie v. New York State Division of Parole.(habeas corpus petition)(Brief Article)
Discipline.
Hubbs v. Alamao.(Hubbs v. Alamao, 360 F.Supp.2d 1073)(Brief Article)
Hubbs v. Alamao.(PRIVACY)(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles