Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,574,118 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Donhauser v. Goord.


U.S. District Court

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SEX OFFENDER sex offender n. generic term for all persons convicted of crimes involving sex, including rape, molestation, sexual harassment and pornography production or distribution.  

Donhauser v. Goord, 314 F.Supp.2d 119 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). A state inmate brought a pro se [section] 1983 action alleging violations of his privilege against self-incrimination The privilege against self-incrimination forbids the government from compelling any person to give testimonial evidence that would likely incriminate him or her during a subsequent criminal case. , due process, equal protection, and privacy rights. The district court held that requiring the inmate, as part of a sexual offender counseling program, to divulge his history of sexual conduct violates the inmate's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination because the inmate faced a loss of good time credit if he refused to divulge his history. The court found that officials were entitled to qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S.  from monetary damages on the inmate's Fifth Amendment claim because the standard defining the inmate's right to be free from compelled self-incrimination was not clearly established at the time. (Oneida Correctional Facility, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:civil rights suit
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:136
Previous Article:Shokeh v. Thompson.(bail )(Brief Article)
Next Article:Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pugh v. Goord.(RELIGION)(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Davidson v. Goord.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Cline v. Fox.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Hernandez v. Goord.(prisoner sues prison employees for conspiracy)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(prisoner seeking declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief)(Brief Article)
Hernandez v. Goord.(inmate alleges prison officials of conspiracy)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Discipline.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles