Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,803 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Donhauser v. Goord.


U.S. District Court

SEX OFFENDER sex offender n. generic term for all persons convicted of crimes involving sex, including rape, molestation, sexual harassment and pornography production or distribution.  

Donhauser v. Goord, 314 F.Supp.2d 139 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). A state prisoner inmate brought a pro se civil rights action seeking declaratory DECLARATORY. Something which explains, or ascertains what before was uncertain or doubtful; as a declaratory statute, which is one passed to put an end to a doubt as to what the law is, and which declares what it is, and what it has been. 1 Bl. Com. 86. , injunctive and monetary relief. The district court held that the inmate's allegations supported a claim for violation of the inmate's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination The privilege against self-incrimination forbids the government from compelling any person to give testimonial evidence that would likely incriminate him or her during a subsequent criminal case.  and that preliminary injunctive relief injunctive relief n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction.  was warranted. The court enjoined prison officials from requiring, as part of the Sexual Offender Counseling Program, participants to divulge their history of sexual conduct, including illegal acts for which no criminal charges had been filed. (Oneida Correctional Facility, New York)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PROGRAMS-PRISONER
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:103
Previous Article:Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Next Article:McEachin v. Beard.(prisoner alleges confiscations violates inmates due process rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pugh v. Goord.(RELIGION)(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Livingston v. Goord.(compensatory damages)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Ainsworth v. Stanley.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Selah v. Goord.(Brief Article)
Selah v. Goord.(violation of inmate's rights)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Discipline.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles