Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,488,626 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Donhauser v. Goord.


U.S. District Court

SEX OFFENDER

Donhauser v. Goord, 314 F.Supp.2d 139 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). A state prisoner inmate brought a pro se civil rights action seeking declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief. The district court held that the inmate's allegations supported a claim for violation of the inmate's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination privilege against self-incrimination self-incrimination n. making statements or producing evidence which tends to prove that one is guilty of a crime. The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that one cannot "be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself..." and the 14th Amendment applies that guarantee to state cases. Thus refusing to testify in court on the basis that the testimony may be self-incriminating is called "taking the Fifth. n. a right to refuse to testify against oneself in a criminal prosecution or in any legal proceeding which might be used against the person. This privilege is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution which provides: "No person....shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself... and that preliminary injunctive relief injunctive relief n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction. Such an act is the use of judicial (court) authority to handle a problem, and is not a judgment for money. was warranted. The court enjoined prison officials from requiring, as part of the Sexual Offender Counseling Program, participants to divulge their history of sexual conduct, including illegal acts for which no criminal charges had been filed. (Oneida Oneida Community, a religious society of Perfectionists that was established (1848) by John Humphrey Noyes. Members of the sect held all property in common and practiced complex marriage and common care of the children. The community prospered by making steel traps and silverware. In 1881 it was reorganized as a joint stock company, and the social experiments were abandoned.

Bibliography



See C. N. Robertson, ed., Oneida Community (1981).
 Correctional Facility, New York)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PROGRAMS-PRISONER
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:103
Previous Article:Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Next Article:McEachin v. Beard.(prisoner alleges confiscations violates inmates due process rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pugh v. Goord.(RELIGION)(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Livingston v. Goord.(compensatory damages)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Ainsworth v. Stanley.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Selah v. Goord.(Brief Article)
Selah v. Goord.(violation of inmate's rights)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Discipline.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles