Don't slam courts' door.Byline: The Register-Guard The first trial of a lawsuit against the maker of a class of painkillers now linked to heart problems opened Thursday in Texas. Opinions vary on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers of the claim that the pharmaceutical giant Merck was negligent in encouraging patients to use Vioxx. What's clear is that if any patients have valid claims, those living in Oregon should have no lesser rights than those living in Texas. To ensure that Oregonians are not uniquely disadvantaged, the Legislature will have to act. Oregon's 1977 product liability statutes sensibly set a deadline for filing lawsuits: Claims must be filed within two years after an injury is alleged to have occurred. For years, Oregon courts interpreted the statutes to mean that if an injury occurred but liability came to light at a later date, the two-year clock started ticking ticking a coat color pigmentation pattern in which hairs of one color are distributed in small groups throughout the background color, e.g. Australian cattle dog. Called also speckling. after the date of discovery. In 2001, however, the Oregon Supreme Court The Oregon Supreme Court (OSC) is the highest state court in the U.S. state of Oregon. The only court that may reverse or modify a decision of the Oregon Supreme Court is the Supreme Court of the United States. ruled that the statute meant what it said: Lawsuits must be filed within two years of the injury, period. This limitation caused an obvious problem for people who are injured in·jure tr.v. in·jured, in·jur·ing, in·jures 1. To cause physical harm to; hurt. 2. To cause damage to; impair. 3. by a product, and find out years later that the manufacturer may have been at fault. The court decision meant that by the time some victims knew that they had a basis for a lawsuit, their rights had expired. The 2003 Legislature, recognizing this problem, amended the law to allow product liability be filed within two years of the date of discovery, restoring the common-sense standard that prevailed before the 2001 court decision. But the amendment was not retroactive Having reference to things that happened in the past, prior to the occurrence of the act in question. A retroactive or retrospective law is one that takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, creates new obligations, imposes new duties, or attaches a - it applied only to injuries occurring after Jan. 1, 2004. The timing problem leaves potential claimants against the makers of Cox-2 inhibitors Cox-2 Inhibitors Definition Cox-2 inhibitors are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) which selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2. The cyclooxygenases are required for the creation of prostaglandins. such as Vioxx out in the cold. Merck pulled Vioxx from the market last September after evidence emerged linking the drug to heart problems. Plaintiffs around the country allege To state, recite, assert, or charge the existence of particular facts in a Pleading or an indictment; to make an allegation. allege v. that Merck and other companies knew or should have known that the drugs could be harmful to some people's health. If that assertion can be proven, the drug-makers could be ordered to pay compensation for damages. Yet under Oregon law, lawsuits against the drug-makers are barred unless except by patients claiming they were harmed within the past two years. Many people took Cox-2 inhibitors long before Vioxx was pulled from the shelves, and may have suffered health problems years before they had reason to believe they had a claim against the drug-makers. Senate Bill 1011 would close the loophole An omission or Ambiguity in a legal document that allows the intent of the document to be evaded. Loopholes come into being through the passage of statutes, the enactment of regulations, the drafting of contracts or the decisions of courts. , allowing lawsuits against the makers of Vioxx and other Cox-2 inhibitors to proceed under the date-of-discovery standard. The measure has passed the Senate but is stalled in the House. Opposition comes from legislators who don't like product liability lawsuits or the trial lawyers who file them. Supporters estimate that SB 1011 would open the door to a few dozen lawsuits. Yet even if only one potential case were involved, fairness would require that it be allowed to move forward. Claims against the drug-makers should be decided on the facts, not on a quirk quirk n. 1. A peculiarity of behavior; an idiosyncrasy: "Every man had his own quirks and twists" Harriet Beecher Stowe. 2. in Oregon's product liability laws. Oregonians should not be barred from the courtroom while people in other states are given a chance to have their cases heard. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion