Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,470 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Don't fence in reform.


Byline: The Register-Guard

With the November elections swiftly approaching, congressional Republicans are caught in an immigration immigration, entrance of a person (an alien) into a new country for the purpose of establishing permanent residence. Motives for immigration, like those for migration generally, are often economic, although religious or political factors may be very important.  booby-trap of their own making.

After the the U.S. Senate approved a flawed but workable comprehensive immigration bill earlier this year, GOP leaders in the House turned their back on an opportunity to cooperate with the Republican-controlled Senate and White House to produce sensible reform.

Instead, House leaders spent the summer staging a silly series of scripted hearings aimed at vilifying the Senate bill and convincing Americans that the U.S.-Mexico border is a war zone crawling with terrorists and narco-thugs.

Now, with the election just weeks away, House Republicans have nothing to show voters on immigration reform Immigration reform is the common term used in political discussions regarding changes to immigration policy. In a certain sense, reform can be general enough to include promoted, expanded, or open immigration, but in reality discussions of reform often deal with the aspect of  except a schism schism, in religion: see heresy; Schism, Great.  within their party.

In a last-ditch effort, the House approved a flurry of new immigration bills in recent days that they hope to add to a must-pass homeland security Noun 1. Homeland Security - the federal department that administers all matters relating to homeland security
Department of Homeland Security

executive department - a federal department in the executive branch of the government of the United States
 spending bill before the election recess. Among other things, the legislation would build 700 miles of fence along the border with Mexico, make it a crime to tunnel underneath U.S. borders and make it easier to deport de·port  
tr.v. de·port·ed, de·port·ing, de·ports
1. To expel from a country. See Synonyms at banish.

2. To behave or conduct (oneself) in a given manner; comport.
 gang members who are not citizens.

John Boehner, R-Ohio, the House majority leader, hailed the bills as evidence that GOP lawmakers "are serious about securing our border and enforcing our law."

Boehner's got it wrong. The bills are evidence that House Republicans are so desperate to conceal their gross negligence An indifference to, and a blatant violation of, a legal duty with respect to the rights of others.

Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or
 on this vital issue that they're trying to pass a hodgepodge hodge·podge  
n.
A mixture of dissimilar ingredients; a jumble.



[Alteration of Middle English hochepot, from Old French, stew; see hotchpot.
 of enforcement measures and fob them off on voters as serious immigration reform.

The Senate should reject this cynical ploy and hold firm on its demand that immigration reform provide not only border security, but also a path to citizenship for qualified illegal immigrants and a guest worker program that matches immigrants with American jobs that would otherwise go unfilled.

That may prove difficult for Senate Republicans, who support construction of a fence and other border measures but want it to be part of comprehensive reform. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, understandably eager to convince voters that Republicans have delivered on immigration reform, is suggesting that senators could approve the enforcement measures and take up the other elements of comprehensive reform after the election.

However, Senate Republicans should heed the counsel of Sen. Arlen Specter Arlen "Phil" Specter (born February 12 1930) is a United States Senator from Pennsylvania. He is a member of the Republican Party, and was first elected in 1980. Biography
Early life and career
, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee The U.S. Senate established the Committee on the Judiciary on December 10, 1816, as one of the original 11 standing committees. It is also one of the most powerful committees in Congress; among its wide range of jurisdictions is investigation of federal judicial nominees and oversight of . Specter rightly warns against dealing with the immigration issue on a piecemeal basis, warning that House leaders would have no incentive to negotiate on nonenforcement reforms in the future.

House Republicans have no one to blame for this mess but themselves. In an effort to motivate the party's conservative base in an election year, they myopically focused on punitive enforcement legislation, while refusing to consider the essential economic pieces of the immigration puzzle

Now, they're in a bind and want the Senate to bail them out. The Senate should respond by saying: "Sorry. See you after the election."
COPYRIGHT 2006 The Register Guard
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorials; The Senate should reject enforcement-only bills
Publication:The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Sep 25, 2006
Words:487
Previous Article:Darfur at the crossroads.(Editorials)(The selection of a U.S. envoy offers some hope)(Editorial)
Next Article:County revenue proposal treats taxpayers as equally as the law allows.(Commentary)
Topics:



Related Articles
Giving enforcement a chance: before we give up on immigration enforcement--why don't we try it?(PUBLIC POLICY)
Temporary madness.(IMMIGRATION)
Cancel this road show.(Editorials)(U.S. needs immigration reform, not debate)(Editorial)
SENATE'S CITIZENSHIP PROPOSAL BASHED.(News)
BORDER FENCE VOTE MAY COME TODAY CALIFORNIA SENATORS SPLIT ON ISSUE.(News)
The real cost of reform.(Editorials)(It's enforcement, not welfare for immigrants)(Editorial)
Hold immigration reform.(Editorials)(Congress should wait until after fall election)(Editorial)
Fences and ladders.(Editorials)(Enforcement-only bill is all about appearance)(Editorial)
Behold, a fence.(IMMIGRATION)(Secure Fence Act of 2006)
Back to immigration.(Editorials)(Lawmakers must address more than enforcement)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles