DoD's reduction in total ownership cost effort: R-TOC--a viable solution to DoD's funding predicament.
Restructuring a company's debt and equity mixture often with the aim of making a company's capital structure more stable.
Companies often want to diversify their debt-to-equity ratio to improve liquidity. at no additional costs--possible or preposterous? Will the Department of Defense (DoD) be able to redirect sufficient funding, under a relatively flat budget topline, to meet its identified needs?
The Department faces a crucial challenge in making sufficient funds available to meet the force structure requirements of today and setting the stage for those of the future. The austere DoD budget must support an aging equipment inventory, while attempting to recapitalize re·cap·i·tal·ize
tr.v. re·cap·i·tal·ized, re·cap·i·tal·iz·ing, re·cap·i·tal·iz·es
To change the capital structure of (a corporation).
re·cap , or modernize, current systems and to procure the next generation's platforms.
One initiative to reallocate Verb 1. reallocate - allocate, distribute, or apportion anew; "Congressional seats are reapportioned on the basis of census data"
allocate, apportion - distribute according to a plan or set apart for a special purpose; "I am allocating a loaf of funding is the Department's Reduction in Total Ownership Cost (R-TOC R-TOC Reduction - Total Ownership Cost ) effort, which attempts to identify potential operation and maintenance (O&M) cost reductions and to move those savings into the acquisition accounts for recapitalizing weapon systems through modernization.
Although the Department is placing a lot of emphasis on its R-TOC initiative, the effort cannot succeed, given its current approach and funding. The ability to reduce costs implies an understanding of the factors that compose them in the aggregate. But before program cost changes are made, the difficulties impacting on and inherent within R-TOC merit examination.
Integral to understanding the difficulties of R-TOC are an appreciation of its origin, the nature of recent defense budgets vis-a-vis planned force structure, planned out-year budgets in the context of national strategy, and why R-TOC provides little relief for O&M cost growth, given the increased use of progressively aging equipment.
To understand this effort to reduce operating costs operating costs npl → gastos mpl operacionales , one must first have a solid definition of what composes total ownership costs (TOC):
"DoD TOC is the sum of all financial resources necessary to organize, equip, sustain, and operate military forces sufficient to meet national goals in compliance with all laws, all policies applicable to DoD, all standards in effect for readiness, safety, and quality of life; and all other official measures of performance for DoD TOC [comprise] costs to research, develop, acquire, own, operate, and dispose of weapon and support systems, other equipment, and real property; the costs to recruit, retain, separate, and otherwise support military and civilian personnel; and all other costs of business operations Business operations are those activities involved in the running of a business for the purpose of producing value for the stakeholders. Compare business processes. The outcome of business operations is the harvesting of value from assets of the DOD." (1)
Proceeding from this definition, the impetuses for reducing ownership or operating costs must also be understood. The age of military equipment is increasing, stretching far beyond the dates initially planned for replacement or system retirement. Today's inventory of aging systems unfortunately coincides with an austere funding environment that doesn't readily provide additional funds, in excess of those needed to operate existing equipment, for upgrade and/or replacement of legacy systems.
This absence of additional funds necessitates an attempt to reallocate O&M (also known as Operation and Sustainment, or O&S) funds to aid in the modernization of military equipment and weapons platforms. Figure 1 depicts the growth in O&S costs as well as the desired transfer of funds from the operational accounts to modernization that helps fund recapitalization efforts. R-TOC is one effort meant to facilitate this transfer by identifying operational cost savings initiatives and redirecting those savings into modernization accounts. Creating such venture capital in the face of increasing operating costs is quite a challenge.
Increasing Operating Costs Strip Funds from Modernization Efforts
At the core of this challenge is the runaway increase in operating costs over the past few years. As previously mentioned, many systems are beyond their planned phase-out dates. Consequently, component parts are in wear-out failure, driving often unpredictable repair costs. Although Sun Tzu's adage that support costs amount to 60 percent of total ownership cost (2) is widely quoted in program cost contexts, Army studies have shown that as much as "... 81 percent of the total ownership cost of a system is incurred after the item has been delivered to the user." (3) As systems get older, demanding more dollars to maintain, and as the overall defense budget remains static, removing funds from O&M for modernization becomes increasingly difficult. This difficulty creates the necessity for a delicate balancing act between the research and development (R&D) and the operation and maintenance accounts.
Such a balance is necessary because of the relatively flat, at best, nature of defense budgets over the past 15 years. The real purchasing power Purchasing Power
1. The value of a currency expressed in terms of the amount of goods or services that one unit of money can buy. Purchasing power is important because, all else being equal, inflation decreases the amount of goods or services you'd be able to purchase.
2. of the DoD's budget over the past decade and a half has declined steadily, save for a small 1.7 percent upturn due to Operation Desert Storm Noun 1. Operation Desert Storm - the United States and its allies defeated Iraq in a ground war that lasted 100 hours (1991)
Gulf War, Persian Gulf War - a war fought between Iraq and a coalition led by the United States that freed Kuwait from Iraqi invaders; in 1991. Figure 2 illustrates the percentage change in defense dollars since 1981, adjusted for inflation and shown in fiscal year (FY) 1999 dollars. In absolute, base-year FY 1999 dollar terms, the DoD budget decreased by more than 28 percent between 1986 and 1999, with continued reductions slated to total more than 34 percent for the time period 1986 through 2003. (4)
Given the flat DoD budget topline and the need to perform today's mission, R&D funds are feeling the squeeze.
The percentage of the DoD budget dedicated to R&D has historically amounted to approximately one-third of the defense budget, but currently stands at one-fifth. (5)
This situation is largely due to the movement of funds out of R&D appropriations to cover the increasing bills being incurred by O&M activities. (Note: While the defense budget has shrunk by almost one-third, O&M costs continue to rise steadily as aging equipment is deployed at unprecedented rates.) Migration of funds from R&D to O &M accounts is in direct opposition to the fundamental requirement to recapitalize the nation's military equipment through modernization and new procurement.
In the absence of an infusion of additional funding to modernize, daily operations will continue to consume a growing share of the defense budget. This share is driven by the Quadrennial Defense Review
The Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) is a report by the United States Department of Defense that analyzes strategic objectives and potential military (DQR DQR Disjoint Queuing Region
DQR Designated Quality Representative
DQR Data Quality Remediation
DQR Digital Quality Reception
DQR Data Quality Report ). The QDR QDR Quadrennial Defense Review (US DoD)
QDR Quad Data Rate (Memory Technology)
QDR Quality Deficiency Report
QDR Quality, Durability and Reliability (Toyota Motor Company) plan was designed with the knowledge that defense budgets were unlikely to exceed $260 billion in the near future.
Unfortunately, the force structure therein defined appears to have a cost in excess of $270 billion just to sustain current low levels of R&D and high operations tempo. (6) A $10-billion gap in nominal (not inflation-adjusted) terms makes the real purchasing power of the arguably ar·gu·a·ble
1. Open to argument: an arguable question, still unresolved.
2. That can be argued plausibly; defensible in argument: three arguable points of law. inadequate $260 billion even less. Any attempt to modernize under the current total DoD budget comes at the expense of O&M funds. Indeed, "... procurement accounts remain insufficient to sustain the QDR force over the medium to long term." (7)
Under this funding scenario, operational pace must decrease drastically and the old equipment must break less often to fund any further systems modernization efforts. Simply stated: Without an infusion of new, additional funding, the force structure supported by the QDR is most likely too small to maintain current operational commitments to the stability of the post-Cold War world.
Having clarified the definition and impetus for R-TOC and reviewed the budget versus force structure condition, attention now shifts to why R-TOC is unable to solve DoD's funding predicament.
R-TOC Not a Viable Solution
Based on the current austere funding and relentless deployment conditions, insufficient venture capital is available to modernize American military forces. Given the expense and difficulty of modernization, R-TOC is not currently a viable solution to this problem. Thirty initial R-TOC pilot programs--10 from each military service--were chosen and directed by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) (USD USD
In currencies, this is the abbreviation for the U.S. Dollar.
The currency market, also known as the Foreign Exchange market, is the largest financial market in the world, with a daily average volume of over US $1 trillion. (A&T)) to identify initiatives that would reduce operating costs. Funding for these R-TOC initiatives was non-existent within these programs, and the acquisition community implied that funds specifically earmarked for R-TOC would be distributed. A total annual R-TOC investment of $600 million was originally touted, with the Army, Navy, and Air Force each receiving some portion based on implementation plans and goals. (8)
Unfortunately, only $140 million per annum Per annum
Yearly. was later programmed for DoD as a whole. (9) This $140 million is an extremely small amount when considered in the context of the upfront investment often required to garner a significant return on investment in the arena of modernization for the purpose of recapitalizing the value of physical assets. In fact, virtually no funding came to fruition as a result of the program objective memorandum process.
Some other reasons why R-TOC currently can't succeed can be found by looking at the shortfalls between projected budgets in contrast to future force structure requirements and the lack of buy-in from operational commands. First, modernization costs take a relegated position when competing with current procurement priorities and meeting immediate operational mission requirements.
Additionally, R-TOC exists as an outgrowth of an acquisition community plan to aid in reprogramming Reprogramming refers to erasure and remodeling of epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation, during mammalian development. After fertilization some cells of the newly formed embryo migrate to the germinal ridge and will eventually become the germ cells O&M funds. As such, buy-in from operational commands is insufficient for success. While the commands support the concept, they are quick to emphasize the need for additional O&M funding, not methods for reducing their fiscal flexibility. After all, the operational commands already are struggling to fit all O&M requirements into their appropriated funding levels. The absence of operational command buy-in limits the scope of potential savings that R-TOC could realize.
Potential savings could be pursued through concept of operation (CONOP CONOP Concept Of Operation
CONOP Continuous Operation
CONOP Contingency Operations Plan ) changes; however, those changes aren't likely to receive approval. Changing a platform's CONOPs due to fiscal influences is a difficult sell in the face of perceived mission degradation precisely attributable to O&M funding shortfalls. However, failure to change now will ultimately engender en·gen·der
v. en·gen·dered, en·gen·der·ing, en·gen·ders
1. To bring into existence; give rise to: "Every cloud engenders not a storm" greater degradation in the future.
If concentration isn't focused on finding efficiencies, no incremental reductions will be available to offset the continued growth in operational costs as deployment and age continue to ravage defense systems. Even with the critical need to find efficiencies, efforts to reduce total ownership costs probably won't yield a lot of net savings. (10)
Most of the "easy" savings have been identified and taken, as commands have operated at a higher than historical pace over 15 years of real-term budget reductions. Any potential savings due to successful R-TOC initiatives, while substantial in terms of incremental benefits to operational accounts, does not create enough lumpsum funding to adequately recapitalize on the scale necessary to modernize the military forces. Any O&M efficiencies are severely needed for O&M-funded infrastructure reinvestment Reinvestment
Using dividends, interest and capital gains earned in an investment or mutual fund to purchase additional shares or units, rather than receiving the distributions in cash.
1. In terms of stocks, it is the reinvestment of dividends to purchase additional shares. .
The challenge of how to come up with the funds necessary to modernize military systems and equipment is a complex one, inextricably in·ex·tri·ca·ble
a. So intricate or entangled as to make escape impossible: an inextricable maze; an inextricable web of deceit.
b. linked to rising O&M requirements and a flat overall defense budget. R-TOC is one such approach to fund this recapitalization, one that involves identifying a platform's total ownership costs and determining ways to reduce those costs. The foregoing has provided an understanding of R-TOC's origin, the nature of recent DoD budgets versus force structure, and why R-TOC fails to provide relief from the funding dilemma driven by O&M cost growth.
While the reasons for R-TOC are laudable laud·a·ble
Healthy; favorable. , the insufficiency INSUFFICIENCY. What is not competent; not enough. of near-term budgets to sustain the QDR force is evident. Clear analysis and sound reasoning show' that although the Department is placing a lot of emphasis on R-TOC initiatives, the effort cannot succeed given its current approach and lack of funding. The challenge of redirecting funding to source modernization is a crucial issue facing DoD leaders, but their ability to recapitalize at no additional costs to the federal government, above the projected Defense budget, doesn't appear possible.
FIGURE 2 OMITTED
(1) "USD (A&T) Sets Goals for Total Ownership Cost." Program Manager. March-April 1999, Volume XXVIII, Number 2, DSMC DSMC Direct Simulation Monte Carlo
DSMC Defense Systems Management College
DSMC Data and Safety Monitoring Committee
DSMC Division-Support Medical Company
DSMC Data Services Management Center (US NASA) 149, pages 72-73. Also, USD A&T Memo, 8 October 1997.
(2) Griffith, Samuel B. Sun Tzu Sun Tzu (sn dz), fl. c.500–320. B.C. : The Art of War. Oxford University Press: New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , 1963, page 74.
(3) Mathews, Randy T. "Total Ownership Cost Reduction--A Secretary of Defense Imperative." Army Logistician. January-February 1999, PB 700-99-1, Volume 31, Issue 1, pages 138-9.
(4) "National Defense Budget Estimate for FY99." Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). March 1998.
(5) O'Hanlon, Michael. How to Be a Cheap Hawk: The 1999 and 2000 Defense Budgets. Brookings Institution Brookings Institution, at Washington, D.C.; chartered 1927 as a consolidation of the Institute for Government Research (est. 1916), the Institute of Economics (est. 1922), and the Robert S. Brookings Graduate School of Economics and Government (est. 1924). Press; Washington, D.C., 1998.
(8) USD (A&T) letter dated 10 May 1999; subject: Future Readiness.
(9) Air Force FY02-FY07 Program Objective Memorandum Preparation Instructions: Attachment 1; and Defense Planning Guidance This document, issued by the Secretary of Defense, provides firm guidance in the form of goals, priorities, and objectives, including fiscal constraints, for the development of the Program Objective Memorandums by the Military Departments and Defense agencies. Also called DPG. for Cost Savings Modernization Initiatives (CSMI CSMI Computer Systems Management, Inc.
CSMI Cyprus Society of Medical Informatics
CSMI Cost Savings Modernization Initiative (USAF)
CSMI Common Storage Management Interface
CSMI Coprocessor Shared Memory Interface ): Attachment 3.
(10) Hale, Robert F. "Strategy for Achieving an Effective and Affordable Air Force." Briefing to CORONA TOP, May 1999.
David Peeler is chief, Cost Accounting and Pricing, for Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee. Previously he served at operational and acquisition locations performing finance, cost, program management, and budget functions. A member of ASMC ASMC American Suzuki Motor Corporation
ASMC American Society of Military Comptrollers
ASMC Association of Sales & Marketing Companies
ASMC Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference
ASMC Area Support Medical Company
ASMC American Small Manufacturers Coalition and SCEA SCEA Sony Computer Entertainment America
SCEA Sun Certified Enterprise Architect
SCEA South Carolina Education Association
SCEA Silicon Valley Chinese Engineers Association
SCEA Society of Cost Estimating and Analysis
SCEA Southeast Center for Education in the Arts , Mr. Peeler is a Certified Cost Estimator/Analyst and a Certified Acquisition Professional. He has worked as adjunct professor of accounting at Campbell University Campbell University is a university in Buies Creek, North Carolina, USA. Campbell is a coeducational, church-related (Baptist) university, and has an approximately equal number of male and female students. , North Carolina North Carolina, state in the SE United States. It is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean (E), South Carolina and Georgia (S), Tennessee (W), and Virginia (N). Facts and Figures
Area, 52,586 sq mi (136,198 sq km). Pop. .