Djakarta; croakers.
One aspect of the worldwide gourmet revolution has been a dramatic
increase in the consumption of frogs' legs, of which Indonesia is a
major producer. This has resulted in a reduction in the number of the
batrachians that inhabit the steamy tropical wetlands abundant in this
equatorial climate, and there have been murmurs of dire environmental
consequences. For example, farmers have been obliged to use more
chemical pesticides than usual owing to the increase in the number of
mosquitoes and other insects that prey upon crops. At the same time,
international wildlife authorities are saying that frog-hunting on the
present scale--Indonesia exports something like 3,500 tons of
frogs' legs a year--could prove disastrous for tropical systems,
breaking major aquatic food chains, and animal-rights activists in
Europe say that the batrachians are slaughtered cruelly to boot. In
some regions, growth of a deleterious plant infection has been blamed on
the rise in the number of frog-hunters, generally rice-farmers who go
out into the paddies with nets and scoops at sunset. On the consumer
side, there are worries that the use of pesticides in India and
Bangladesh (big frogs'-legs producers) as well as in Indonesia may
poison the flesh. Some shipments of Indonesian frogs' legs have
been rejected by American customs authorities as being infected with
salmonella bacteria. Finally, according to some Islamic teaching, the
frog is an unclean beast and may not be eaten, and as Indonesia has the
biggest Moslem population in the world, the question is of importance.
The status of this problem so far, according to the deliberations of a
group of Moslem scholars convened to consider it, is that Moslems may
raise frogs but not breed them.
COPYRIGHT 1985 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion