Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,610,896 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Disregarded entities.


On Jan. 30, 2006, the AICPA AICPA

See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
 asked the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  to withdraw proposed regulations on the treatment of disregarded dis·re·gard  
tr.v. dis·re·gard·ed, dis·re·gard·ing, dis·re·gards
1. To pay no attention or heed to; ignore.

2. To treat without proper respect or attentiveness.

n.
 entities in allocating partnership liabilities under Sec. 752.

Under the proposed regulations (issued in August 2004), when determining economic risk of loss for Sec. 752 purposes, a disregarded entity's payment obligation should be taken into account only to the extent of the entity's net value. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the AICPA, however, the proposal, in application, will "create significant compliance burdens for taxpayers" and will "result in inconsistent treatment" for different entities.

There may be situations in which partnership interests are held through disregarded entities for nontax considerations. Under the current regulations, it is assumed that all partners with obligations to make payments intend to actually perform those obligations (regardless of their actual net worth); if the facts and circumstances indicate a plan to circumvent cir·cum·vent  
tr.v. cir·cum·vent·ed, cir·cum·vent·ing, cir·cum·vents
1. To surround (an enemy, for example); enclose or entrap.

2. To go around; bypass: circumvented the city.
 or avoid the obligation, a partner's obligation may be disregarded. Under the proposed regulations, however, this "intent element" is removed, leaving a regime that apples a net value standard when a disregarded entity holds a partnership interest while an intent standard is used in all other situations.

Rather than this proposal, the AICPA believes that the existing ant-abuse rule should be expanded, to make clear that the rule addresses the concerns at which the proposed regulations are aimed.

Lesli S. Laffie, J.D., LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) .
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:AICPA ACTIVITIES
Author:Laffie, Lesli S.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Apr 1, 2006
Words:226
Previous Article:Rolling average cost inventory method.(AICPA ACTIVITIES)
Next Article:Energy tax benefits for individuals.(FROM THE IRS)



Related Articles
Small business tax solutions. (expanded investment opportunities for S corporations)
Proposal to expense start-up costs.
Sec. 357(c) and single-member LLCs or QSSSs. (Internal Revenue Code s. 357(c), limited liability companies, qualified Subchapter S...
AICPA comments on "check-the-box" prop. regs.(IRS proposed regulations)
AICPA issues accounting, reporting rules for entities that Lend or Finance. (Accounting & auditing news).(American Institute of Certified Public...
AICPA on MTC's reporting-options proposal.(Multistate Tax Commission )
Temp. Regs. on mergers involving disregarded entities.
Branch transactions.(AICPA Activities)
CRT safe harbor for spousal rights extended - waivers not required.(charitable remainder trusts)
Final regs. on treatment of disregarded entities under Sec. 752.(PARTNERS AND PARTNERSHIPS)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles