Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,550,447 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Disregarded entities' liability for excise and employment taxes.


Qualified subchapter S Subchapter S

IRS regulation that gives a corporation with 35 or fewer shareholders the option of being taxed as a partnership to escape corporate income taxes.
 subsidiaries (QSubs) and certain other single-owner disregarded entities would be responsible for paying employment and excise taxes excise taxes, governmental levies on specific goods produced and consumed inside a country. They differ from tariffs, which usually apply only to foreign-made goods, and from sales taxes, which typically apply to all commodities other than those specifically exempted.  under new IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  guidance. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the Service, the proposed rules (REG-114371-05,10/17/05) would treat those disregarded entities as separate, "regarded" entities for purposes of paying and reporting Federal employment and excise taxes, a shift from the existing system. The rules would apply to QSubs and single-owner eligible entities disregarded for Federal tax purposes under Sec. 7701.

Big change: The proposed roles are a significant change from the current structure. Under existing rules, either the disregarded entity or its owner can calculate and pay these taxes, but the ultimate responsibility for them remains with the entity's owner. By contrast, the new guidance would shift employment and excise tax Excise Tax

1. An indirect tax charged on the sale of a particular good.

2. A penalty tax applied to ineligible transactions in retirement accounts. This penalty is assessed by and paid to the IRS.

Notes:
1.
 responsibility entirely to the affected disregarded entities. Disregarded status would be eliminated for these entities for this limited purpose, although it would continue for other Federal tax purposes.

The change means entity owners would no longer be responsible for excise and employment taxes at all.

Easing compliance: The IRS proposed this change because the existing system, allowing payment and calculation of tax by either the entity or its owner, has caused significant difficulties for both taxpayers and the government.

According to the regulations' preamble, "[t]he Treasury Department and the IRS believe that treating the disregarded entity as the employer for purposes of federal employment taxes will improve the administration of the tax laws and simplify compliance."

Under the proposed rules, a disregarded entity would become liable for employment taxes on wages paid to its employees. It also would be responsible for backup withholding backup withholding

Compulsory withholding from payments to an investor in order to take care of a potential tax liability. Payments of interest, dividends, and proceeds from a sale of securities are subject to backup withholding when certain requirements are
, making timely deposits of taxes, filing returns and providing wage statements to employees.

The IRS said the regulations' employment tax provisions are proposed to apply to wages paid on or after January 1 following the date the regulations appear in the Federal Register. Until that time, affected entities can continue to use Notice 99-6. If the owner currently satisfies its subsidiaries' employment tax obligations, it must continue to do so until Notice 99-6 is invalidated in·val·i·date  
tr.v. in·val·i·dat·ed, in·val·i·dat·ing, in·val·i·dates
To make invalid; nullify.



in·val
.

For excise taxes, the new rules are proposed to apply to liabilities imposed and actions first required or permitted in periods beginning on or after January 1 following the date the rules are published as final. Until that point, owners will be treated as meeting their excise tax obligations, if they are satisfied either by the owner or by the disregarded entity on the owner's behalf.

Lesli S. Laffie, J.D., LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) .
COPYRIGHT 2005 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Laffie, Lesli S.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Dec 1, 2005
Words:422
Previous Article:Retirement plan COLAs.(FROM THE IRS)
Next Article:Should a taxpayer elect the alternative incremental research credit?
Topics:



Related Articles
Pension excise tax entitled to bankruptcy priority.
Nonfiler program may be extended to employment, excise taxes. (Brief Article)
IRS issues guidance on the treatment of a trust as foreign or domestic.
Certain mergers involving disregarded entities qualify as a reorganizations.(proposed IRS regulation)
IRS issues intermediate-sanctions regulations.(excise taxes against disqualified persons participating in excess-benefit transactions with tax-exempt...
TEI comments on proposed Form 8858.(Tax Executives Institute, information returns for foreign disregarded entities)
Planning strategies to avoid intermediate sanctions.
Check-the-box: not always the right answer for certain foreign corporations.
Toll phone services not subject to excise tax.
Long-distance telephone excise tax refunds - 2006 tax returns affected.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles