Differential effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254: congener-specific analysis and neurochemical end points. (Articles).

Aroclor 1254 is a widely studied commercial polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture which, by definition, contains 54% chlorine by weight. Recent reports indicate substantial differences in the congener composition among Aroclor lots and hence their biologic effects. We designed the current study to compare the effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 (lots 6024 and 124-191). We analyzed these two lots for PCB congeners, polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs), and polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs). We used previously established techniques for analyzing intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering and protein kinase C (PKC) translocation to test their biologic activity in neuronal preparations. PCB congener-specific analysis indicated that ortho and non-ortho congeners in these two lots varied in their percent contribution. Among all congeners, the percentages of non-ortho congeners (PCBs 77, 81, 126, and 169) were higher in lot 6024 (2.9% of total) than in lot 124-191 (0.02% of total). We detected no dioxins in these two lots (< 2 ppD. Although there are some differences in the congener composition, total PCNs were similar in both lots: 171 ppm in lot 6024 and 155 ppm in lot 124-191. However, total PCDFs were higher in lot 6024 (38.7 ppm) than in lot 124-191 (11.3 ppm). When we tested these two Aroclors on [Ca.sup.2+] buffering and PKC translocation in brain preparations, the effects were significantly different. Although lot 124-191 was more potent on PKC translocation than lot 6024, lot 6024 was slightly more active on [Ca.sup.2+] buffering than lot 124-191. These effects could not be attributed to the differences in the percentage of non-ortho congeners or PCDFs because they were inactive on these two parameters. The effects could not be attributed to PCNs because the levels were almost similar. The effects seen with two lots of Aroclor 1254 in neuronal cells were also not predicted based on the TCDD toxic equivalents (TEQs), although TEQs predicted the effects on ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) or methoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (MROD) activities. It is possible that the differential effects seen in neuronal cells could be caused by differences in the composition of ortho-congeners in these two mixtures, because PCBs with ortho-lateral substitutions can exhibit different activities on the selected neurochemical end points. Because of these differential effects with different lot numbers, the composition of Aroclor mixtures used in investigations should be disclosed. Key words: Aroclor 1254, dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls, protein kinase C, toxic equivalents. Environ Health Perspect 109:1153-1161 (2001). [Online 5 November 2001] http:// ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2001/109p1153-1161kodavanti/abstract.html

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) belong to a large group of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons and consist of 209 theoretically possible congeners with different numbers and positions of chlorines (1,2). These compounds were commercially produced as Aroclor mixtures in the United States by the chlorination of biphenyl, which produces technical mixtures containing a given chlorine content depending on the duration of the chlorination process. Although all 209 congeners can be synthesized, the reaction conditions in the commercial processes favor certain substitution reactions leading to particular composition of the technical mixtures, which are identified by the weight percentage of chlorine content. For example, Aroclor 1254 contains 54% chlorine by weight, as indicated by the last two digits in the numeric designation (1-5).

These compounds were used widely in industry as heat transfer fluids, hydraulic lubricants, dielectric fluids for transformers and capacitors, flame retardants, plasticizers, and sealants and in carbonless copy paper because of their chemical and thermal stability, dielectric properties, and miscibility with organic compounds. These same properties have now contributed to their ability to cause environmental and human health problems (6-9). PCBs are distributed throughout the entire ecosystem including soil, air, and water (10). They are also highly likely to bioaccumulate in the food chain because of their lipophilicity, and they therefore belong to a class of environmental chemicals called persistent bioaccumulative toxicants (PBTs) (11).

PCBs have a wide range of effects in humans, including chloracne, diverse hepatic effects, decreased birth weight in the offspring of occupationally exposed mothers, decreased pulmonary function, eye irritation, subtle endocrine disturbances, cancer, and learning and memory deficits (10-13). Several of these effects have also been demonstrated in animals during adult and developmental exposure to commercial PCB mixtures such as Aroclor 1254 (6,7,9,11, 14,15). In animal models, some individual PCB congeners and commercial PCB mixtures have shown tumor-promoting activity (16). The information from these animal studies with commercial PCB mixtures has been used in the risk/exposure assessment of PCBs and related environmental chemicals (2,15). However, recent reports using high-resolution gas chromatography (HRGC) indicate substantial differences in the congener composition among Aroclor lots (17,18); hence their biologic effects could be different. Toxicity studies with Aroclor 1254 have produced varied results (19,20), but these differences were attributed to the animal species or dosing paradigm rather than to the composition of Aroclor 1254. We designed the current study to study the effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 (lots 6024 and 124-191) obtained from AccuStandard (New Haven, CT, USA) on the neurochemical end points that were previously reported to be sensitive to PCBs in neuronal preparations (21-23) and to compare the effects with the PCB congener composition and other contaminants in these two lots of Aroclor 1254. These two lots of Aroclor 1254 have been used widely by investigators for the last several years.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals. Aroclor 1254 (> 99% purity) with lot numbers 6024 and 124-191 were purchased from AccuStandard. For neurochemical experiments, we prepared stock solutions of two Aroclor 1254 lots by dissolving them in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A 2-[micro]L aliquot of stock solution (different concentrations) was added to the buffer to yield the desired final concentrations. DMSO (2 [micro]L/mL) had no significant effect either on [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake or [sup.3]H-phorbol ester binding.

Animals. Timed pregnant female (13 days of gestation) and adult male (90-120 days) Long-Evans rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratory. Pregnant dams were housed individually and adult rats were housed two per cage in Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-approved animal facilities. Food (Rodent Chow; Purina, St. Louis, MO) and water were provided ad libitum. Temperature was maintained at 21 [+ or -] 2 [degrees] C and relative humidity at 50 [+ or -] 10% with a 12-hr light/dark cycle (0700-1900 hr).

PCB congener-specific analysis of two lots of Aroclor 1254 with two lot numbers. We performed congener-specific analysis of PCBs according to previously established method (24-26).

Non-ortho, coplanar PCBs must be isolated from other dominant ortho-PCBs for their trace level determination. This is achieved by the use of Cosmosil 5-PYE column-HPLC method, as described in Kannan et al. (26). HPLC was performed with Pump-Constametric III with Rheodyne injector (LDC Analytical Gmbh, GH Friedrich, Germany) and the flow rate was 1 mL of hexane per minute on Cosmosil 5-PYE column [2-(1-pyrenyl) ethyldimethylsilylated silica gel], 250 x 4.6 mm, particle size 5 mm (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). From the stock solution (~1 ng/[micro]L), 100 [micro]L was injected and the eluates were collected in 4 fractions of 16 mL. The dead volume was 3.5 mL. The first fraction: 3.5-5.0 mL; second fraction 5-7.5 mL; third fraction 7.5-16 mL. These fractions were subsequently cooled (0 [degrees] C) and concentrated using vacuum flash evaporator (flushing with [N.sub.2]) and analyzed in high-resolution multidimensional gas chromatography-electron capture detector (HRMDGC-ECD).

This was performed using Fison 8000 GC-ECD (Fison Instruments Gmbh, Goettingen, Germany) with moving capillary stream switching technique. The gas chromatograph was equipped with a column injector, two columns in two independent ovens and two [Ni.sup.63] electron capture detectors. An apolar SE-54 (50 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter) was placed in the first oven, and a more polar OV-210 (30 m length, 0.32 mm internal diameter) in the second one. Gas pressure ([H.sub.2]) was 1.1 bar and 0.6 bar. Temperature programming conditions were as follows: first column from 50 [degrees] C (1 min) to 160 [degrees] C (5 min) up to 250 [degrees] C at 5 [degrees] C per min and the second column at 100 [degrees] C until 20 min after injection; then temperature increased to 240 [degrees C at 5 [degrees] C per min. The instrument was well tuned to inject the sample three times and the average was taken. Because non-ortho PCBs contribute to many of the toxic equivalents (TEQ) values, we extracted triplicate samples. The variability was always less than 10%. Standardization of this method was done using artificially created PCB mixture containing 46 individual congeners from non-ortho to tetra-ortho chlorine substituted PCBs (Table 1).

We determined coplanar PCBs exclusively from the III fraction of PYE column chromatography using individual PCBs 77, 81, 126, and 169 standards (99.9% pure). Any possible coelution from other congeners was monitored using a HRMDGC-ECD. We determined the remaining PCB congeners applying our routine procedure to environmental samples. Using the specially prepared technical standard, we determined the presence of every PCB congener. When a congener was present at levels < 0.05%, we considered it undetectable. Heart-cuts were made for those congeners that coeluted usually (27).

Analysis of PCDFs, PCDDs, and PCNs in two lots of Aroclor 1254. We performed the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD), polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF), and polychlorinated naphthalene (PCN) analyses as per the modified methods described previously (28,29). Isomer-specific analyses were done using HRGC (HP6890) low-resolution mass spectroscopy (Hewlett-Packard 5973MS; Hewlett Packard, Tokyo, Japan).

PCB samples (50-100 mg of Aroclor 1254 with lot numbers 6024 and 124-191) dissolved in 1-5 mL hexane were chromatographed on basic alumina (300 mesh, 5 g; Merck. Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany) activated overnight at 130 [degrees] C. After the initial absorption, 150 mL of hexane was passed through the column to remove most of the PCBs, followed by 100 mL of dichloromethane:hexane (1:1) at 1 drop/sec flow rate. The second fraction was concentrated to 1 mL and applied to activated charcoal/silica gel minicolumn. The minicolumn was washed with 40 mL toluene in the reverse direction, and 30 mL 5% methylene chloride/hexane, followed by 10 mL hexane in the normal direction, before use. After the initial absorption, the column was washed with 10 mL of hexane and then 30 mL of 5% methylene chloride/hexane to remove nonplanar PCBs. The final eluate that was obtained using 40 mL of toluene in the reverse direction was microconcentrated to 0.1 mL and applied for determination by HRGC-LRMS. We used an HP6890 (gas chromatograph)--HP5973 (mass spectrometer) (Hewlett Packard) equipped with SP-2331 fused silica capillary column (60 pm internal diameter) to analyze tetra- to hexachlorinated PCDD/PCDFs, and a DB5 column (30 [micro]m internal diameter) to determine hepta- and octachlorinated isomers. The MS was equipped with a quadrapole system and with an electron impact ionization source.

The identification of PCDFs and PCDDs was based on the fact that signals were observed at characteristic mass numbers (m/z) at proper retention times and in proper ratio of the M+ and (M+2) cluster ions in mass fragmentography. We identified PCDF isomers with reference to authentic standards from Wellington Laboratories Ltd. (Ontario City, Ontario, Canada). We used EPA-1613PAR for the 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers, and we identified all the other isomers reported according to Ryan et al. (30). We used EPA-1613LCS and EPA-1613CSS as an internal standard and a syringe spiking standard. Recoveries of tetra-CDD, penta-CDD, hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD and octa-CDD congeners through the analytic procedures were 66-140%, 83-129%, 70-112%, 62-121%, and 41-95%, respectively. Recoveries of PCN congeners have been reported earlier (31). PCN congener 1,2,3,4-tetra-CN was present in blank at trace amounts and therefore was not quantified.

Neurochemical end points. Fractionation of adult rat cerebella to obtain microsomes and mitochondria was performed according to Cotman and Matthews (32). We determined intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering by measuring the uptake of [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] by microsomes and mitochondria as outlined by Moore et al. (33).

We isolated granule cells from cerebellum of 7-day-old rats by the enzymatic disruption of cells as outlined by Gallo et al. (34) with modifications (35). These cells were maintained for 7 days in vitro in culture and used for protein kinase C (PKC) translocation studies. We determined PKC translocation by measuring [sup.3]H-phorbol ester binding according to Vaccarino et al. (36).

Statistics. We analyzed the neurochemical data by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with lot number as one factor and the concentration as the other followed by Dunnett's post-hoc test. All analyses were performed with PROC GLM of SAS software (37). We calculated the [IC.sub.50] (concentration that inhibits control activity by 50%) and [E.sub.50] (concentration that increases control activity by 50%) values for [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake and [sup.3]H-phorbol ester binding, respectively, from the regression line fit to the linear portion of the curve using GraphPad Instat Software (GraphPad Instat Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). We compared the [IC.sub.50] and [E.sub.50] values between the two lots using Student's t-test. The accepted level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Composition of PCB congeners and contaminants such as PCDFs, PCDD, and PCNs in two lots of Aroclor 1254. A definitive statistical analysis of the quantitative performance of this congener-specific analysis requires detailed regression analysis of all standards, analysis of multiple replicates of sample, and multiple replicate injections. Time constraints, cumbersome heart-cut analysis of non-ortho PCB congeners, and tedious analyses of contaminants precluded such analyses. The quantitative information provided in this article permits only a comparison of relative congener distribution in the two lots of Aroclor 1254.

The congener-specific analysis of Aroclor 1254 indicated that the composition of PCBs was different in both lots (Table 2). Some PCB congeners were higher in lot 6024, whereas some other congeners were higher in lot 124-191. PCBs 40, 47-48, 70, 74, 77, 81, 92, 99, 105, 110, 123, 126, 138, 156, and 157 were higher in lot 6024. On the other hand, PCBs 44, 49, 52, 66, 85, 97, 132, 135, (137+176), 149, 174, and 187 were higher in lot 124-191.

When PCB congeners were grouped based on the number of chlorines (mono- to nona-; Table 5), both lots had similar percentages of PCB congeners except the heptachlorinated ones, where lot 124-191 had higher levels (5.9%) than did lot 6024 (3.5%). When the congeners were grouped based on the number of ortho-chlorine substitutions, non-ortho PCBs were several-fold (about 150-fold) higher in lot 6024 than in lot 124-191. Mono-ortho PCBs were also significantly higher in lot 6024 (38% of total) than in lot 124-191 (24% of total). On the other hand, tri-ortho PCBs were significantly higher in lot 124-191 (21% of total) than in lot 6024 (14% of total), while di- and tetra-ortho PCBs were almost similar in both lots (Table 6).

PCDF composition was different in both lots of Aroclor 1254 as well. Lot 6024 had higher levels of total PCDFs as well as 2,3,7,8-PCDFs than did lot 124-191 (Tables 3 and 5). Based on the amount, total as well as penta-CDFs to octa-CDFs were higher in lot 6024 than in lot 124-191. The percentage of tetra-CDFs was lower and penta-CDFs was higher in lot 6024 than in lot 124-191. Dioxins were not detected in either lot of Aroclor 1254 (Tables 3 and 5). Total PCNs were similar in both lots: 171 pg/[micro]g in lot 6024 versus 155 pg/[micro]g in lot 124-191. However, penta- and hexa-PCNs were slightly higher in lot 6024, while hepta-and octa-PCNs were slightly higher in lot 124-191 (Table 4).

We calculated the TEQ values for both lots of Aroclor 1254 using the toxic equivalent factor (TEF) values from the World Health Organization (38). We calculated the total TEQ value for lot 124-191 as 39.42 [micro]g/g, and the TEQ value for lot 6024 was 400.63 [micro]g/g. The TEQ value for lot 6024 was 11 times higher than that of lot 124-191 (39).

Neurochemical effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254. Both lots of Aroclor 1254 inhibited microsomal [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1). Microsomal [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake in control tissue is 50.5 [+ or -] 2.1 (mean [+ or -] SE) pmol/mg protein/min. The ANOVA indicated a significant interaction: The PCB levels were plotted either as concentration (microgram per milliliter; [F.sub.5,36] = 8.41; p < 0.0001) or as TEQ (picograms per milliliter; [F.sub.2,30] = 52.05; p < 0.0001), suggesting that the response of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on microsomal [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake is different in each case. The calculated [IC.sub.50] values for microsomal [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake were significantly different between two lots of Aroclor 1254; the difference was much greater when the values were transformed to represent TEQ (nanograms TEQ per milliliter) compared to the original concentrations (micrograms Aroclor 1254 per milliliter).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Both lots of Aroclor 1254 also inhibited mitochondrial [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2). Mitochondrial [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake in control tissue was 11.2 [+ or -] 0.4 (mean [+ or -] SE) pmol/mg protein/min. The ANOVA indicated a significant interaction. Either the PCB levels were plotted as concentration (micrograms per milliliter; [F.sub.5,36] = 4.04; p < 0.0052) or as TEQ (picograms per milliliter; [F.sub.2,30] = 46.3; p < 0.0001), suggesting that the response of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on mitochondrial [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake is different in each case. The [IC.sub.50] values for mitochondrial [sup.45][Ca.sup.2+] uptake were not significantly different among the two lots of Aroclor 1254 when the levels were represented as concentration (micrograms per milliliter); however, they are significantly different when the values were transformed to represent TEQ (Table 7).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Glutamate (30 [micro]M), which was used as a positive control, increased [sup.3]H-PDBu binding by 2-fold, and this is in agreement with previous reports (40,41). Both lots of Aroclor 1254 significantly increased [sup.3]H-PDBu binding in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3). [sup.3]H-PDBu binding in control cultures is 479 [+ or -] 25 (mean [+ or -] SE) fmol/mg protein/15 min. The ANOVA indicated a significant interaction: Either the PCB levels were plotted as concentration ([F.sub.4,49] = 5.94; p < 0.0006) or as TEQ ([F.sub.1,49] = 64.2; p < 0.0001), suggesting that the response of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on [sup.3]H-PDBu binding is different in each case. The [E.sub.50] values for [sup.3]H-PDBu binding were significantly different between the two lots of Aroclor 1254; the difference was much greater when the values were transformed to represent TEQ than for the original concentrations (Table 7).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

In general, the data from neurochemical end points indicate that the effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering is comparable, but lot 124-191 was more effective on PKC translocation than was lot 6024. The potency difference between the two lots ranged from 1.2- to 2.5-fold when PCB levels were represented as concentration. However, this difference increased to several-fold (8- to 29-fold) when PCB levels were transformed to TEQs (Figures 1-3; Table 7).

Discussion

Health risks associated with exposure to PCBs and related chemicals have been assessed based on either total PCB concentrations or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) TEQs using the TEF concept when congener-specific data are available. U.S. EPA has adopted the TEF approach as an interim procedure that assumes additivity for the toxic effects of individual congeners in the mixtures and a common mechanism of toxic action (e.g., ability to interact with and activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor). In addition, assessment of risks to humans is based on the reference doses (RfDs) derived from animal studies with commercial PCB mixtures (15). Recently, a new approach has been developed to assess the cancer risk from environmental PCB exposure, and this approach considers both toxicity and environmental processes to distinguish among environmental mixtures (42). Although current risk/exposure assessment is based on these approaches, several problems were identified with the recent literature. Several studies from our laboratory as well as others indicate that ortho-substituted PCBs that do not or weakly bind to aryl hydrocarbon receptors are highly active in neuronal and other preparations (43-45). Because ortho-PCBs are highly abundant in environmental samples (> 99%), lack of significant consideration of this group of PCBs in the TEF approach could lead to underestimation of risk associated with exposure to these PCBs. Likewise, RfDs derived from commercial mixtures might not be accurate because the pattern of relative proportions of PCBs in environmental mixtures is variable and does not resemble the composition of the original PCB mixtures that were released into the environment. Recent reports indicate substantial differences in the congener composition among Aroclor lots (17,18), so their biologic effects could be different (19,20). In the present study, we report a thorough PCB congener analysis along with the contaminants such as PCDFs, PCNs, and any dioxins in two different lots of Aroclor 1254 mixtures and their effects on selected neurochemical end points that were previously reported to be sensitive to PCBs in neuronal preparations (21-23).

Results from this study indicate that the composition of PCB congeners was significantly different between the two lot numbers of Aroclor 1254. We detected no dioxins in either lot (< 2 ppb), as anticipated. PCNs were similar in both lots. Other contaminants in this mixture, such as PCDFs, were detectable, mainly because PCDFs are produced often as co-contaminants in PCB preparation (28). In the present study, lotto-lot differences in PCDF levels have been identified, with lot 6024 having 3.4 times more PCDFs than lot 124-191. Differences in the congener composition between different lots for a variety of Aroclor mixtures have been previously reported (17,18). However, this is the first detailed report of congener-specific analysis that includes contaminants in these two lots of Aroclor 1254, a widely used commercial mixture in the United States for conducting scientific research. Of the two lots of Aroclor 1254 tested, lot 6024 has more non-ortho PCBs and PCDFs contributing to higher TEQ values. Recently, Frame (18) discussed the manufacturing process of several lots of Aroclor 1254 and the differences in the congener composition. Lot 124-191 of Aroclor 1254 has the typical PCB congener distribution. However, lot 6024 has unusually enhanced levels of non-ortho and mono-ortho congeners and PCDFs. Lot 6024 has been traced back to Monsanto lot KI-6024 and represents the late (1974-1976) production of Aroclor 1254s, which used a two-stage chlorination procedure (18). In the first stage, biphenyl was chlorinated to 42% chlorine content by weight as for Aroclor 1242 production and then fractionated to give a distillate that was sold as Aroclor 1016. In the second stage, the residue from the distillate was further chlorinated to 54% chlorine by weight, greatly increasing the levels of non-ortho and mono-ortho congeners with high TEF values (18). Caution should be used when comparing the results using this lot (lot 6024) with results from other lots of Aroclor 1254.

The biologic activity of two lots of Aroclor 1254 was tested on two previously established neurochemical end points, intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering and PKC translocation. We selected these two end points on the basis of our previous work, where intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering by endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria as well as PKC translocation were preferentially affected by ortho-substituted PCBs (43). Intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering is essential for maintaining normal calcium homeostasis (46). When intracellular free-[Ca.sup.2+] levels increase, PKC may translocate from cytosol to the membrane, where it gets activated. Increases in intracellular free [Ca.sup.2+] levels by PCBs have been reported by several investigators in several cell systems (35,47,48). In addition, increases in intracellular free-[Ca.sup.2+] levels, inhibition of [Ca.sup.2+] buffering, and PKC activation and translocation have been involved in the neurotoxicity of a variety of environmental chemicals (49-51). When these two lots of Aroclors were tested on [Ca.sup.2+] buffering and PKC translocation in brain preparations, the effects were significantly different. Intracellular [Ca.sup.2+] buffering by microsomes and mitochondria was significantly inhibited by both lots of Aroclor 1254 in a concentration-dependent manner. Lot 6024 seems to be more potent than lot 124-191. This difference in the potency increased several-fold when the concentration of Aroclor 1254 was transformed to TEQ values (derived from dioxin TEFs), demonstrating that the greater effect with lot 6024 is not caused by the greater aryl hydrocarbon-receptor binding activity alone. PKC translocation, measured as [sup.3]H-phorbol ester binding, was significantly increased by both lots of Aroclor 1254; lot 124-191 was significantly more active than lot 6024. As seen with [Ca.sup.2+] buffering, the difference in the potency also increased several-fold when the concentration of Aroclor 1254 was transformed to TEQ, suggesting that the dioxin-like congeners are not responsible for this effect. The differential effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on the selected neurochemical end points could not be clearly explained by the differences in their TEQ values. However, Burgin et al. (39) reported that TEQ predicted the effects on ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) or methoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (MROD) activities (strict dioxin-like effects), but not pentoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (PROD) or circulating serum thyroxine levels. These results suggest that different end points may be observed with different PCB mixtures. Hence, a mixture that is of low concern for one end point may be of greater concern for another end point. In addition, these results suggest that overall toxicity of complex mixtures can not be entirely predicted based on the TEQ values and caution should be used when making risk assessment decisions about chemical mixtures that involve both aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

In general, current data indicate that the effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on selected neurochemical end points could not be explained either by total mass or by TEQ. These effects could not be attributed to the differences in the percentage of non-ortho congeners or dibenzofurans because they were inactive on these two parameters. These effects also could not be attributed to the interactions among the congeners and contaminants because our previous studies indicated that inactive congeners did not interfere with the activity of active congeners, and the interactions between two active congeners seem to follow additivity (52). However, these differential effects could be caused by differences in the composition of ortho-congeners in these two mixtures, because PCBs with ortho-lateral substitutions have been shown to exhibit different activities on the selected neurochemical end points (43). Because of these differential effects between different lots, the composition of Aroclor mixtures used in investigations should be disclosed.

Table 1. Composition of polychlorinated biphenyls in the standard
solution, their structures, IUPAC numbers, number of ortho-chlorine
substitution, and the coeluting congeners.

                                                        No.     Coe-
                                 Concen-                of     lution
IUPAC                            tration      Frac-    ortho   (IUPAC
 no.    Structure             (pg/[micro]L)    tion     CI      nos.)

8       2,4'                      17.5          I        1         5
18      2,2',5                    12.0          I        2      17,15
28      2,4,4'                     9.1          I        1        31
31      2,4',5                    10.6          I        1        28
44      2,2',3,5'                 10.7          I        2
49      2,2',4,5'                 12.1          I        2
52      2,2',5,5'                 17.3          I        2
66      2,3',4,4'                 11.0          I        1        95
70      2,3',4',5                 13.9          II       1
74      2,4,4',5                   9.7          II       1
77      3,3',4,4'                 10.3         III       0       110
81      3,4,4',5                  10.6         III       0
92      2,2',3,5,5'               10.6          I        2
95      2,2',3',5,6               11.4          II       3        66
99      2,2',4,4',5                9.7          I        2
101     2,2',4,5,5'               18.5          I        2        90
105     2,3,3',4,4'               11.0         III       1     153,132
110     2,3,3',4',6               11.1          II       2        77
118     2,3 ',4,4',5              17.0        II/III     1     123,149
123     2',3,4,4',5               11.8         III       1     149,118
126     3,3',4,4',5               11.0         III       0     129,178
128     2,2',3,3',4,4'            14.2          I        2
129     2,2',3,3',4,5              9.7          II       2     126,178
132     2,2',3,3',4,6'            11.1          II       3     105,153
137     2,2',3,4,4',5             12.0          II       2       176
138     2,2 ',3,4,4',5'           27.6          I        2     158,160
141     2,2',3,4,5,5'              9.6          I        2       179
149     2,2',3,4',5',6            12.1          I        3     123,118
153     2,2',4,4',5,5'            16.7          II       2     105,132
156     2,3,3',4,4',5              9.4         III       1     171,202
157     2,3,3',4,4',5'             4.3         III       1     173,201
169     3,3',4,4',5,5'             9.2         III       0
170     2,2',3,3',4,4',5          13.4         III       2       190
174     2,2',3,3',4,5,6'           9.4          II       3
177     2,2',3,3',4',5,6           9.5          II       3
178     2,2',3,3',5,5',6           9.8          II       3     129,126
179     2,2',3,3',4,6,6'           9.3          II       4       141
180     2,2',3,4,4',5,5'          32.6          II       2
183     2,2',3,4,4',5',6          10.3          I        3
187     2,2',3,4',5,5',6          16.1          I        3
189     2,3,3',4,4',5,5'           3.4         III       1
190     2,3,3',4,4',5,6           10.4         III       2       170
191     2,3,3',4,4',5',6           2.6         III       2
194     2,3,3',4,4',5,5',6        12.6         III       2
199     2,2',3,3',4,5,6,6'         9.3          II       4
202     2,2',3,3',5,5',6,6'       10.6          I        4     156,171

PYE column HPLC separation of these congeners is shown in the column
"Fraction." Fraction I, 3.5-5.0 mL; fraction II, 5.0-7.5 mL; fraction
III, 7.5-16 mL hexane.
Table 2. Congener-specific analysis of Aroclor 1254 with two
different lot numbers (mg/g).

                                    No.
                           IUPAC    of            Lot        Lot
PCBs                         no.    CI    o-CI   124-191    6024

2                               1     1      1     --        --
3                               2     1      0     --        --
4                               3     1      0     --        --
2,2'                            4     2      2     --        --
2,3                             5     2      1     --        --
2,3'                            6     2      1     --        --
2,4                             7     2      1     --        --
2,4'                            8     2      1     --        --
2,5                             9     2      1     --        --
2,6                            10     2      2     --        --
3,3'                           11     2      0     --        --
3,4                            12     2      0     --        --
3,4'                           13     2      0     --        --
3,5                            14     2      0     --        --
4,4'                           15     2      0     --        --
2,2',3                         16     3      2     --        --
2,2',4                         17     3      2     --        --
2,2',5                         18     3      2     --        --
2,2',6                         19     3      3     --        --
2,3,3'                         20     3      1     --        --
2,3,4                          21     3      1     --        --
2,3,4'                         22     3      1     --        --
2,3,5                          23     3      1     --        --
2,3,6                          24     3      2     --        --
2,3',4                         25     3      1     --        --
2,3',5                         26     3      1     --        --
2,3',6                         27     3      2     --        --
2,4,4'                         28     3      1     --        --
2,4,5                          29     3      1     --        --
2,4,6                          30     3      2     --        --
2,4',5                         31     3      1     --        --
2,4',6                         32     3      2     --        --
2',3,4                         33     3      1     --        --
2',3,5                         34     3      1     --        --
3,3',4                         35     3      0     --        --
3,3',5                         36     3      0     --        --
3,4,4'                         37     3      0     --        --
3,4,5                          38     3      0     --        --
3,4',5                         39     3      0     --        --
2,2',3,3'                      40     4      2     2.11      3.36
2,2',3,4                   {41 +      4      2     9.71      9.81
2,3,4',6                   64}        4      2
2,2',3,4'                      42     4      2     --        --
2,2',3,5                       43     4      2     --        --
2,2',3,5'                      44     4      2    25.18     10.46
2,2',3,6                       45     4      3     --        --
2,2',3,6'                      46     4      3     --        --
2,2',4,4'                  {47 +      4      2     --        5.96
2,2',4,5                   48}        4      2
2,2',4,5'                      49     4      2    21.36      4.07
2,2',4,6                       50     4      3     --        --
2,2',4,6'                      51     4      3     --        --
2,2',5,5'                      52     4      2    35.06      7.73
2,2',5,6'                      53     4      3     --        --
2,2',6,6'                      54     4      4     --        --
2,3,3',4                       55     4      1     --        --
2,3,3',4'                      56     4      1     --        --
2,3,3',5                       57     4      1     --        --
2,3,3',5'                      58     4      1     --        --
2,3,3',6                       59     4      2     --        --
2,3,4,4'                       60     4      1     --        --
2,3,4,5                        61     4      1     --        --
2,3,4,6                        62     4      2     --        --
2,3,4',5                       63     4      1     --        --
2,3,5,6                        65     4      2     --        --
2,3',4,4'                  {66 +      4      1    90.78     75.98
2,2',3,5',6                95}        5      3
2,3',4,5                       67     4      1     --        --
2,3',4,5'                      68     4      1     --        --
2,3',4,6                       69     4      2     --        --
2,3',4',5                      70     4      1    25.24     63.57
2,3',4',6                      71     4      2     --        --
2,3',5,5'                      72     4      1     --        --
2,3',5',6                      73     4      2     --        --
2,4,4',5                       74     4      1     4.36     23.47
2,4,4',6                       75     4      2     --        --
2',3,4,5                       76     4      1     --        --
3,3',4,4'                      77     4      0     0.01     27.20
3,3',4,5                       78     4      0     --        --
3,3',4,5'                      79     4      0     --        --
3,3',5,5'                      80     4      0     --        --
3,4,4',5                       81     4      0     0.01      0.28
2,2',3,3',4                {82 +      5      2    22.02     20.98
2,2',3,5,5',6              151 }      6      3
2,2',3,3',5                    83     5      2     4.29      4.30
2,2',3,3',6                    84     5      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4'                    85     5      2     7.16      --
2,2',3,4,5                     86     5      2     --        --
2,2',3,4,5'                {87 +      5      2    42.21     47.22
2,3,4,4',6                 115}       5      2
2,2',3,4,6                     88     5      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,6'                    89     5      3     --        --
2,2',3,4',5                {90 +      5      2    72.28     61.60
2,2',4,5,5'                101}       5      2
2,2',3,4',6                    91     5      3    20.24     22.54
2,2',3,5,5'                    92     5      2    28.34     36.00
2,2',3,5,6                     93     5      3     --        --
2,2',3,5,6'                    94     5      3     --        --
2,2',3,6,6'                    96     5      4     --        --
2,2',3',4,5                    97     5      2    20.33      --
2,2',3',4,6                    98     5      3     --        --
2,2',4,4',5                    99     5      2    24.97     37.10
2,3,3',4,6                    109     5      2     --        --
2,2',4,4',6                   100     5      3     --        --
2,2',4,5,6'                   102     5      3     --        --
2,2',4,5',6                   103     5      3     --        --
2,2',4,6,6'                   104     5      4     --        --
2,3,3',4,4'                   105     5      1    51.00    130.00
2,3,3',4,5                    106     5      1     --        --
2,3,3',4',5                   107     5      1     --        --
2,3,3',4,5'                   108     5      1     --        --
2,3,3',4',6                   110     5      2    76.57     87.15
2,3,3',5,5'                   111     5      1     --        --
2,3,3',5,6                    112     5      2     --        --
2,3,3',5',6                   113     5      2     --        --
2,3,4,4',5                 {114 +     5      1     0.05      0.78
2',3,3',4,5                122 +      5      1
2,2',3,3',4,6              131}       6      3
2,3,4,5,6                     116     5      2     --        --
2,3,4',5,6                    117     5      2     --        --
2,3',4,4',5                   118     5      1   127.00    124.00
2,3',4,4',6                   119     5      2     --        --
2,3',4,5,5'                   120     5      1     --        --
2,3',4,5',6                   121     5      2     --        --
2',3,4,4',5                   123     5      1     0.57      2.14
2',3,4,5,5'                   124     5      1     --        --
2',3,4,5,6'                   125     5      2     --        --
3,3',4,4',5                   126     5      0     0.17      3.24
3,3',4,5,5'                   127     5      0     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4'                128     6      2     7.04      9.67
2,2',3,3',4,5                 129     6      2     8.70      9.34
2,2',3,3',4,5'                130     6      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,6'                132     6      3    33.03     25.82
2,2',3,3',5,5'                133     6      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',5,6                 134     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',5,6'                135     6      3    12.30      6.69
2,2',3,3',6,6'                136     6      4     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5              {137 +     6      2     4.18      --
2,2',3,3',4,6,6'           176}       7      4
2,2',3,4,4',5'                138     6      2    58.70     71.80
2,2',3,4,4',6                 139     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',6'                140     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,5,5'              {141 +     6      2    12.18     12.86
2,2',3,3',5,6,6'           179}       7      4
2,2',3,4,5,6                  142     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,5,6'                 143     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,5',6                 144     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,6,6'                 145     6      4     --        --
2,2',3,4',5,5'                146     6      2    10.29      8.44
2,2',3,4',5,6                 147     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4',5,6'                148     6      3     --        --
2,2',3,4',5',6                149     6      3    41.76     14.37
2,2',3,4',6,6'                150     6      4     --        --
2,2',3,5,6,6'                 152     6      4     --        --
2,2',4,4',5,5'                153     6      2    31.80     33.93
2,2',4,4',5,6'                154     6      3     --        --
2,2',4,4',6,6'                155     6      4     --        --
2,3,3',4,4',5                 156     6      1     4.80     51.00
2,3,3',4,4',5'                157     6      1     0.36     26.30
2,3,3',4,4',6                 158     6      2     --        --
2,3,3',4,5,5'                 159     6      1     --        --
2,3,3',4,5,6                  160     6      2     --        --
2,3,3',4,5',6                 161     6      2     --        --
2,3,3',4',5,5'                162     6      1     --        --
2,3,3',4',5,6                 163     6      2     --        --
2,3,3',4',5',6                164     6      2     --        --
2,3,3',5,5',6                 165     6      2     --        --
2,3,4,4',5,6                  166     6      2     --        --
2,3',4,4',5,5'                167     6      1     --        --
2,3',4,4',5',6                168     6      2     --        --
3,3',4,4',5,5'                169     6      0     0.01      0.02
2,2',3,3',4,4',5              170     7      2     4.02      3.39
2,2',3,3',4,4',6              171     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,5'              172     7      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,6               173     7      3     0.77      1.74
2,2',3,3',4,5,6'              174     7      3    31.12     18.32
2,2',3,3',4,5',6              175     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4',5,6              177     7      3     1.59      0.88
2,2',3,3',5,5',6              178     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5,5'              180     7      2     5.18      4.51
2,2',3,4,4',5,6               181     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5,6'              182     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5',6              183     7      3     1.97      1.36
2,2',3,4,4',6,6'              184     7      4     --        --
2,2',3,4,5,5',6               185     7      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,5,6,6'               186     7      4     --        --
2,2',3,4',5,5',6              187     7      3     3.51      0.39
2,2',3,4',5,6,6'              188     7      4     --        --
2,3,3',4,4',5,5'              189     7      1     --        --
2,3,3',4,4',5,6               190     7      2     --        --
2,3,3',4,4',5',6              191     7      2     --        --
2,3,3',4,5,5',6               192     7      2     --        --
2,3,3',4',5,5',6              193     7      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5'           194     8      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,6            195     8      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5',6           196     8      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',6,6'           197     8      4     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,5',6            198     8      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,6,6'            199     8      4     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5',6,6'           200     8      4     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,5',6'           201     8      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',5,5',6,6'           202     8      4     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5,5',6            203     8      3     --        --
2,2',3,4,4',5,6,6'            204     8      4     --        --
2,3,3',4,4',5,5',6            205     8      2     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6         206     9      3     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,6,6'         207     9      4     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,5,5',6,6'         208     9      4     --        --
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6'      209    10      4     --        --

No. of CI, number of total chlorine substitutions; No. of o-CI, number
of ortho-chlorine substitutions. PCBs without any values are below the
detection limit, < 0.05% (w/w). The PCB numbers are in agreement with
IUPAC convention, but note the change in numbers for PCBs 199, 200,
and 201 compared to Ballschmitter and Zell (3).
Table 3. Concentration (ng/g; ppb) of PCDFs and PCDDs in Aroclor
1254 with two different lot numbers.

PCDFs/PCDDs                       Lot 124-191   Lot 6024

Tetra-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 2.0 ppb)
 1368                                 --           --
 1378/1379                            10.0         --
 1347                                 --           --
 1468                                 --           --
 1247/1367                            --           --
 1348                                 --           --
 1346/1248                           109.9         7.6
 1246/1268                            25.0         --
 1478/1369/1237                       15.0         --
 1678/1234                            --           --
 2468/1238/1467/1236                  54.9         --
 1349                                 --           --
 1278                                 79.9         --
 1267/1279                            30.0        30.4
 1469                                 --           --
 1249                                 84.9        68.5
 2368                                 --           --
 2467                                 15.0        15.2
 1239                                 --           --
 2347                                 89.9       289.2
 1269                                 --           --
 2378                                129.9       350.1
 2348                                719.2       730.6
 2346                                 49.9        49.5
 2367                                219.7       152.2
 3467                                 --           --

 1289                                 44.9         --
Penta-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 2.0 ppb)
 13468                                --           --
 12468                                --           --
 13678                                --           --
 13479                                --           --
 12368/13478                           8.6        20.9
 12478                               235.2       292.2
 12479/13467                           4.3        20.9
 12467                                94.1        41.7
 14678/12347                         102.6        41.7
 13469                                --           --

PCDFs/PCDDs                       Lot 124-191   Lot 6024T

Penta-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 2.0 ppb)
 12348/12378                         295.0       1920.2
 12346                                34.2         --
 12379                                --           --
 12367                                 8.6        167.0
 12469/12678                         615.7       2838.6
 12679                                --           --
 12369                                --           --
 23468                                81.2        250.5
 12349                                --           --
 12489                               470.3       3757.0
 23478                               821.0       4049.2
 12389                                --           --
 23467                               162.5        751.4
Hexa-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 4.0 ppb)
 123468                               17.1         --
 134678                               85.3         --
 134679                               --           --
 124678                              238.9         --
 124679                               17.1         --
 123478/123479                      1638.1       4571.4
 123678                              733.7       3190.5
 124689                              418.1        952.4
 123467                              341.3       2142.9
 123679                               --           --
 123469/123689                       597.2       2238.1
 123789                               --           --
 123489                              443.7       2761.9
 234678                              213.3       1333.3
Hepta-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 4.0 ppb)
 1234678                             581.8       1506.5
 1234679                             375.8       1286.8
 1234689                             157.6        470.8
 1234789                             533.3       1459.4
Octa-CDF (0.0 = ND; < 4.0 ppb)
 12346789                            356.0        945.6
 PCDDs                                ND           ND
                                   <2.0 ppb     < 2.0 ppb

ND, not detected.
Table 4. Concentration (ng/g; ppb) of PCNs in
Aroclor 1254 with two different lot numbers.

PCNs              Lot 124-191   Lot 6024

3 Chlorines
 135                   0.9         4.7
 136                   0.0         0.0
 146/124               6.2        33.8
 137                   0.6         2.0
 125                   0.8         3.5
 126                   0.7         3.4
 167/127               1.2         4.8
 123                   0.2         0.4
 236                   0.2         0.7
 145/138               3.0        12.9
 128                   1.3         3.6
4 Chlorines
 1357                  6.7        17.0
 1246/1247/1257       56.9       120.2
 1467                 33.0        53.4
 1367                  1.0         2.3
 1235/1256            12.1        21.9
 1368/1358            16.8        55.8
 1234/1236             1.3         2.7
 1245/1237            12.8        14.4
 1267                  5.2        13.1
 1248                 19.2        43.1
 1258                 71.6       150.5
 2367                  0.0         0.0
 1268                  1.5         5.8
 1458                 36.2        46.3
 1238                  0.0         0.0
 1278                 44.1        15.2
5 Chlorines
 12357/12467        5709.1      2591.8
 12457               423.0       105.8
 12468              3005.4       735.0
 12346               397.5       140.6
 12356               761.8       227.5
 12456              3183.9      1250.3
 12367                59.7         8.4
 12478              5586.3      1243.1
 12358              2183.1       737.8
 12368                 0.0         0.0
 12458              1550.3       880.3
 12345               276.7       106.3
 12378               122.9        89.6
6 Chlorines
 123467/123567      8899.8      6233.4
 123457/123568     15260.7     10030.7
 123578            31115.2     18089.3
 124568/124578     24761.0     21068.5
 123456            10914.4      6512.7
 123458             3992.7      3736.1
 123678               45.0        40.1
7 Chlorines
 1234567           18527.3     27277.7
 1234568           26320.4     38534.3
8 Chlorines
 12345678           7799.1     14988.0
Table 5. Different PCB/PCDF/PCDD/PCN congeners based on the number of
chlorines in the Aroclor 1254 mixtures with two different lot numbers.

                                  Concentration

Aroclor 1254                   Mono, di,
lot numbers         Units      and tri        Tetra         Penta

124-191
 PCBs            ng/[micro]g      ND        168 (17.6)    504 (52.7)
 PCDFs           pg/[micro]g      ND       1.68 (14.3)   2.93 (25.8)
 2,3,7,8-PCDFs   pg/[micro]g      ND       0.13 (2.6)    1.12 (22.6)
 PCDDs           pg/[micro]g      ND           ND             ND
 PCNs            pg/[micro]g     0.070        0.562          8.12
6O24
 PCBs            ng/[micro]g      ND       194 (18.6)      539 (51.6)
 PCDFs           pg/[micro]g      ND       1.69 (4.4)    14.15 (36.6)
 2,3,7,8-PCDFs   pg/[micro]g      ND       0.35 (1.9)     5.97 (32.5)
 PCDDs           pg/[micro]g      ND           ND             ND
 PCNs            pg/[micro]g     0.015        0.319         23.26

                               Concentration

Aroclor 1254                                    Octa,
lot numbers          Hexa          Hepta         nona

124-191
 PCBs             228 (23.8)      56 (5.9)        ND
 PCDFs           4.74 (41.8)    1.65 (14.5)   0.36 (3.1)
 2,3,7,8-PCDFs   2.58 (52.3)    1.12 (22.5)       ND
 PCDDs                ND            ND            ND
 PCNs               65.71          65.81        14.99
6O24
 PCBs              274 (26.3)     37 (3.5)         ND
 PCDFs           17.19 (44.4)   4.72 (12.2)   0.95 (2.4)
 2,3,7,8-PCDFs    9.09 (49.5)   2.97 (16.1)       ND
 PCDDs                ND            ND            ND
 PCNs               94.99          44.85         7.80

ND, not detected. The numbers in parentheses indicate the percentage
of total with respective groups (PCBs, PCDFs, 2378 PCDFs, or PCDDs).
Table 6. PCB congeners (pg/ng) based on ortho-substitutions
in the Aroclor 1254 mixtures with two different lot numbers.

              Total PCB congeners (pg/ng)

PCBs          Lot 124-191   Lot 6024

Non-ortho         0.2        30.74
                (0.02%)      (2.9%)
Mono-ortho       230.8       393.4
                (24.1%)     (37.7%)
Di-ortho         514.5       472.8
                (53.8%)     (45.3%)
Tri-ortho        202.7       140.6
                (21.2%)     (13.5%)
Tetra-ortho      8.18         6.43
                (0.85%)     (0.62%)

The numbers in parentheses indicate the percentage of
total.
Table 7. Differential effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on
intracellular [Ca.sup.2+]. buffering and PKC translocation
in the brain.

                           Concentration ([micro]g/ml)

Neurochemical end
      point             Lot 124-191             Lot 6024

Intracellular
    [Ca.sup.2+]
    buffering
    ([IC.sub.50])
  Microsomes         1.65 [+ or -] 0.05    1.23 [+ or -] 0.05 *
  Mitochondria       1.78 [+ or -] 0.07    1.47 [+ or -] 0.08
PKC translocation
  ([E.sub.50])      11.03 [+ or -] 1.29   28.01 [+ or 0] 6.01 *

                                    TEQ (ng/ml)

Neurochemical end
      point             Lot 124-191               Lot 6024

Intracellular
    [Ca.sup.2+]
    buffering
    ([IC.sub.50])
  Microsomes        0.065 [+ or -] 0.002   0.493 [+ or -] 0.020 *
  Mitochondria      0.070 [+ or -] 0.003   0.589 [+ or -] 0.032 *
PKC translocation
  ([E.sub.50])      0.435 [+ or -] 0.051   11.22 [+ or -] 2.41 *

* Significantly different from lot 124-191 at p < 0.05. Values are
mean [+ or -] SE of 4-6 dose-response experiments shown in Figures
1-3 (n = 4-6). [IC.sub.50] values for [Ca.sup.2+] buffering and
[E.sub.50] values for PKC translocation ([sup.3]H-phorbol ester
binding) were calculated from the regression line fit to the
linear portion of the data presented in Figures 1-3.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

(1.) Erickson MD. Analytical Chemistry of PCBs. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL:Lewis Publishers, 1996.

(2.) ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls Substances and Disease Registry (PCBs). Atlanta, GA:U.S Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999.

(3.) Ballschmitter K, Zell M. Analysis of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) by glass capillary gas chromatography. Composition of technical Aroclor- and chlophen-PCB mixtures. Fresenius' Z Anal Chem 302:20-31 (1980).

(4.) Safe S, Hutzinger O. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): Mammalian and Environmental Toxicology. Environmental Toxin Series, Vol 1. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1987;152.

(5.) Lang V. Polychlorinated biphenyls in the environment. J Chromatogr 595:1-43 (1992).

(6.) Safe S. Toxicology, structure-function relationship, and human and environmental health impacts of polychlorinated biphenyls: progress and problems. Environ Health Perspect 100:259-268 (1992).

(7.) Safe S. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical end toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 24:87-149 (1994).

(8.) Swanson GM, Ratcliffe HE, Fischer LJ. Human exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): a critical assessment of the evidence for adverse health effects. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 21:136-150 (1995).

(9.) Tilson HA, Kodavanti PRS. Neurochemical effects of polychlorinated biphenyls: an overview and identification of research needs. Neurotoxicology 18:727-744 (1997).

(10.) Risebrough RW, Rieche P, Peakall DB, Herman SG, Kirven MN. Polychlorinated biphenyls in the global ecosystem. Nature 220:1098-1102 (1968).

(11.) Fisher BE. Focus: most unwanted persistent organic pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 107:A16-A23 (1999).

(12.) Seegal RF. Epidemiological and laboratory evidence of PCB-induced neurotoxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 26:709-737 (1996).

13. Laib RJ, Rose N, Brunn H. Hepatocarcinogenicity of PCB congeners. Toxicol Environ Chem 34:19-22 (1991).

(14.) Li MH, Hansen LG. Consideration of enzyme and endocrine interactions in the risk assessment of PCBs. Rev Toxicol 1:71-156 (1997).

(15.) Giesy JP, Kannan K. Dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 28:511-569 (1998).

(16.) Silberhorn EM, Glauert HP, Robertson LW. Carcinogenicity of polyhalogenated biphenyls: PCBs and PBBs. Crit Rev Toxicol 20:439-496 (1990).

(17.) Frame GM, Cochran JW, Bowadt SS. Complete PCB congener distributions for 17 Aroclor mixtures determined by 3 HRGC systems optimized for comprehensive, quantitative, congener-specific analysis. J High Resolut Chromatogr 19:657-668 (1996).

(18.) Frame GM. Improved procedure for single DB-XLB column GC-MS-SIM quantitation of PCB congener distributions and characterization of two different preparations sold as "Aroclor 1254." J High Resolut Chromatogr 22:533-640 (1999).

(19.) WHO. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls. 2nd ed. Environmental Health Criteria 140. Geneva:World Health Organization, 1993;338-443.

(20.) Mayes BA, McConnell EE, Neal BH, Brunner MJ, Hamilton SB, Sullivan TM, Peters AC, Ryan MJ, Toft JD, Singer AW, et al. Comparative carcinogenicity in Sprague-Dawley rats of the polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures Aroclors 1016, 1242,1254, and 1260. Toxicol Sci 41:62-76 (1998).

(21.) Kodavanti PRS, Ward TR, McKinney JD, Tilson HA. Increased [[sup.3]H]phorbol ester binding in rat cerebellar granule cells by polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures and congeners: structure-activity relationships. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 130:140-148 (1995).

(22.) Kodavanti PRS, Ward TR, McKinney JD, Tilson HA. Inhibition of microsomal and mitochondrial [Ca.sup.2+]-sequestration in rat cerebellum by polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures and congeners: structure-activity relationship. Arch Toxicol 70:150-157 (1996).

(23.) Kodavanti PRS, Ward TR, McKinney JD, Waller CL, Tilson HA. Increased [[sup.3]H]phorbol ester binding in rat cerebellar granule cells and inhibition of [Ca.sup.2+]-sequestration in rat cerebellum by polychlorinated diphenyl ether congeners and analogs: structure-activity relationships. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 138:251-261 (1996).

(24.) Schulz-Bull DE, Petrick G, Duinker JC. Complete characterization of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in commercial aroclor and clophen mixtures by multi-dimentional gas chromatography-electron capture detection. Environ Sci Technol 23:852-859 (1989).

(25.) Kannan N, Reusch TBH, Schulz-Bull DE, Petrick G, Duinker JC. Chlorobiphenyls: model compounds for metabolism in food chain organisms and their potential use as ecotoxicological stress indicators by application of the metabolic slope concept. Environ Sci Technol 29:1851-1859 (1995).

(26.) Kannan N, Petrick G, Bruhn R, Schulz-Bull DE. Structure-dependent separation method for non-ortho PCBs with matrix-integrated quality control: a multidimentional analytical approach. Chemosphere 37:2385-2393 (1998).

27. Duinker JC, Schulz-Bull DE, Petrick G. Multidimensional gas chromatography with electron capture detection for the determination of toxic congeners in PCB mixtures. Anal Chem 60:478-482 (1988).

(28.) Wakimoto T, Kannan N, Ono M, Tatsukawa R, Masuda Y. Isomer-specific determination of polychlorinated dibenzofurans in Japanese and American polychlorinated biphenyls. Chemosphere 17:743-750 (1988).

(29.) Kannan K, Yamashita N, Imagawa T, Decoen W, Khim JS, Day RM, Summer CL, Giesy JP. Polychlorinated naphthalenes and polychlorinated biphenyls in fishes from Michigan waters including the Great Lakes. Environ Sci Technol 34:566-572 (2000).

(30.) Ryan J J, Conacher HBS, Panopio LG, Lau BP-Y, Hardy JA. Gas chromatographic separations of all 136 tetra- to octa-polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans on nine different stationary phases. J Chromatogr 541:131-183 (1991).

(31.) Kannan K, Imagawa T, Blankenship A, Giesy JP. Isomer-specific analysis and toxic evaluation of polychlorinated naphthalenes in soil, sediment and biota collected near the site of a former chlor-alkali plant. Environ Sci Technol 32:2507-2514 (1998).

(32.) Cotman CW, Matthews DA. Synaptic plasma membranes from rat brain synaptosomes: isolation and partial characterization. Biochem Biophys Acta 249:380-394 (1971).

(33.) Moore L, Chen T, Knapp HR Jr, Landon EL. Energy dependent calcium sequestration activity in rat liver microsomes. J Biol Chem 250:4562-4568 (1975).

(34.) Gallo V, Kingsbury A, Balazs R, Jergensen OS. The role of depolarization in the survival and differentiation of cerebellar granule cells in culture. J Neurosci 7:2203-2213 (1987).

(35.) Kodavanti PRS, Shin D, Tilson HA, Harry GJ. Comparative effects of two polychlorinated biphenyl congeners on calcium homeostasis in rat cerebellar granule cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 123:97-106 (1993).

(36.) Vaccarino FM, Liljequist S, Tallman JF. Modulation of protein kinase C translocation by excitatory and inhibitory amino acids in primary cultures of neurons. J Neurochem 57:391-396 (1991).

(37.) SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Vol 2, GLM-VARCOMP, Verson 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC:SAS Institute, Inc.

(38.) Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld ATC, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesy JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, et al. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106:775-792 (1998).

(39.) Burgin DE, Diliberto JJ, Derr-Yellin EC, Kannan N, Kodavanti PRS, Birnbaum LS. Differential effects of two lots of Aroclor 1254 on enzyme induction, thyroid hormones, and oxidative stress. Environ Health Perspect 109:1163-1168 (2001).

(40.) Vaccarino FM, Liljequist S, Tallman JF. Modulation of protein kinase C translocation by excitatory and inhibitory amino acids in primary cultures of neurons. J Neurochem 57:391-396 (1991).

(41.) Kodavanti PRS, Shafer TJ, Ward TR, Mundy WR, Freudenrich T, Harry GJ, Tilson HA. Differential effects of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners on phosphoinositide hydrolysis and protein kinase C translocation in rat cerebellar granule cells. Brain Res 662:75-82 (1994).

(42.) Cogliano VJ. Assessing the cancer risk from environmental PCBs. Environ Health Perspect 106:317-323.

(43.) Kodavanti PRS, Tilson HA. Structure-activity relationships of potentially neurotoxic PCB congeners in the rat. Neurotoxicology 18:425-442 (1997).

(44.) Fischer L J, Seegal RF, Ganey PE, Pessah IN, Kodavanti PRS. Symposium overview: toxicity of non-coplanar PCBs. Toxicol Sci 41:49-61 (1998).

(45.) Tilson HA, Kodavanti PRS. The neurotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls. Neurotoxicology 19:517-526 (1998).

(46.) Carafoli E. Intracellular calcium homeostasis. Ann Rev Biochem 56:395-433 (1987).

(47.) Carpenter DO, Stoner CRT, Lawrence DA. Flow cytometric measurements of neuronal death triggered by PCBs. Neurotoxicology 18:507-514 (1997).

(48.) Vole OA, Fonnum F. Ortho-substituted polychlorinated biphenyls elevate intracellular [[Ca.sup.2+]] in human granulocytes. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 5:105-112 (1998).

(49.) Kodavanti PRS, Mundy WR, Tilson HA, Harry GJ. Effects of selected neuroactive chemicals on calcium transporting systems in rat cerebellum and on survival of cerebellar granule cells. Fundam Appl Toxicol 21:308-316 (1993).

(50.) Nicotera P, Bellomo G, Orrenius S. Calcium mediated mechanisms in chemically induced cell death. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 32:449-470 (1992).

(51.) Pachter JA, Pal J-K, Mayer-Ezell R, Petrin JM, Dobek E, Bishop WR. Differential regulation of phosphoinositide and phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis by protein kinase C-b1 over-expression. J Biol Chem 267:9826-9830 (1992).

(52.) Kodavanti PRS, Ward TR. Interactive effects of environmentally relevant polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins on [[sup.3]H]phorbol ester binding in rat cerebellar granule cells. Environ Health Perspect 106:479-486 (1998).

Prasada Rao S. Kodavanti, (1) Narayanan Kannan, (2) Nobuyoshi Yamashita, (3) Ethel C. Derr-Yellin, (1) Thomas R. Ward, (1) Deborah E. Burgin, (4,5) Hugh A. Tilson, (1) and Linda S. Birnbaum (4)

(1) Neurotoxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; (2) Department of Marine Chemistry, University of Kiel, D24105, Kiel, Germany; (3) National Institute for Resources and Environment, Hydrospheric Environmental Protection Department, Tsukuba, Japan; (4) Experimental Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; (5) Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Address correspondence to P.R.S. Kodavanti, Neurotoxicology Division, MD 74B, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

We thank J. Cogliano of NCEA and N. Walker of NIEHS for their comments on the earlier version of this manuscript.

D.E.B. was supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences under T32-ES07126 and by the U.S. EPA under cooperative agreement CT902908. Preliminary findings presented in this article were presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology, New Orleans, Louisiana, 14-18 March 1999.

The research described in this article has been reviewed by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the agency nor does mention of tradenames or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Received 18 December 2000; accepted 2 May 2001.