Developers break their word in eminent domain promise.Breaking its word and defying both Governor M. Jodi Rell and the Connecticut legislature, the New London New London, city (1990 pop. 24,540), New London co., SE Conn., on the Thames River near its mouth on Long Island Sound; laid out 1646 by John Winthrop, inc. 1784. Development Corporation has apparently decided not to abide by To stand to; to adhere; to maintain. See also: Abide a moratorium called for by both the Governor and legislature. At least two residents in so-called Parcel 3 of the Fort Trumbull Fort Trumbull was a fort built at New London, Connecticut. In 1775 Governor Jonathan Trumbull recommended the building of a fortification at the port of New London to protect the seat of the government of Connecticut. area on Monday, September 12 received notices that they must vacate To annul, set aside, or render void; to surrender possession or occupancy. The term vacate has two common usages in the law. With respect to real property, to vacate the premises means to give up possession of the property and leave the area totally devoid of contents. the properties in 90 days and must start paying rent to the NLDC NLDC New London Development Corporation during that period. "The NLDC's actions are breathtaking in their arrogance and defiance of the wishes of Governor Rell and Connecticut's legislature," said Scott Bullock, a senior attorney at the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Justice, which represents the Fort Trumbull homeowners. "The NLDC is an unelected, unaccountable body that has been given the government's eminent domain eminent domain, the right of a government to force the owner of private property sell it if it is needed for a public use. The right is based on the doctrine that a sovereign state has dominion over all lands and buildings within its borders, which has its origins in power and is out of control. It is time Connecticut's political leaders at the state and local levels reel in this group that has been abusing the rights of New London property owners." Less than two months ago, on July 26, the NLDC agreed to honor a moratorium called for by the Connecticut legislature and agreed not to seek to take possession of the homes while the legislature considered changing its eminent domain laws. "Virtually the entire country is against the abuse of eminent domain by the NLDC, but its actions demonstrate that it could not care less what it has done to the rights of the citizenry and reputation of New London," noted Dana Berliner, another Institute senior attorney. Berliner added that unless the NLDC agrees again to abide by the moratorium, Connecticut political leaders must formally pass one to force the NLDC to honor its word. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion