Developer scores on 2 fronts for Center West; Hekmat triumphs in financing, contract squabbles.The developer of Westwood's elegant Center West office highrise appears to have emerged victorious from two key legal battles - and now controls a project suddenly better able to compete for tenants. Kam Hekmat, who heads the Center West limited partnership that developed the 300,000-square-foot tower, arranged new mortgage financing for the property with a new principal amount of $54.9 million, title records show - hardly four months before its existing $90 million-balance loan matured. Just last fall, Center West had filed a lawsuit against the property's mortgage-holder at that time - Fuji Bank The Fuji Bank, Limited (株式会社富士銀行 Ltd.'s Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. Agency - seeking to prevent Fuji from selling the loan to other investors. And L.A. County Superior Court Judge Leon Savitch has also tentatively ruled that Hekmat's family-led partnership is the "prevailing party The litigant who successfully brings or defends an action and, as a result, receives a favorable judgment or verdict. prevailing party n. the winner in a lawsuit. " in a five-year case pertaining per·tain intr.v. per·tained, per·tain·ing, per·tains 1. To have reference; relate: evidence that pertains to the accident. 2. to Center West's construction contract and should be awarded $6.3 million. Hekmat characterized the resolution of the two disputes as "bittersweet bittersweet, name for two unrelated plants, belonging to different families, both fall-fruiting woody vines sometimes cultivated for their decorative scarlet berries. " for the Center West team - bitter because it's been a hassle, sweet because the results were wins. More affordable rents One consequence of the new financial arrangement is that Hekmat's team should be able to market the 1990-vintage tower's 100,000-some square feet of never-leased space at more affordable rental rates. The new mortgage arrangement follows Center West's lawsuit last fall against Fuji, the former mortgage holder, Fuji officials had informed Hekmat that they intended to sell the mortgage, and a legal dispute arose over the then-pending sale and Center West's access to the identities and offer terms of other parties interested in buying the loan. Fuji officials and attorneys noted in court documents that the often-modified mortgage - which the borrowers have always kept current - would mature this June. The documents also stated that Fuji "believes that neither Center West nor Hekmat have the financial capacity to pay off the loan or even make a meaningful bid to buy out the loan," which carried a balance "millions of dollars" above the property's current market value. New player But with the help of the commercial real estate brokerage firm that handles Center West leasing, First Property Realty realty n. a short form of "real estate." (See: real estate) REALTY. An abstract of real, as distinguished from personalty. Realty relates to lands and tenements, rents or other hereditaments. Vide Real Property. Corp., Hekmat was able to prove that statement wrong - and hence render the lawsuit moot An issue presenting no real controversy. Moot refers to a subject for academic argument. It is an abstract question that does not arise from existing facts or rights. . First Property helped Center West arrange the deal through which Lehman Brothers Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LEH), founded in 1850, is a diversified, global financial services firm. It is a participant in investment banking, equity and fixed income sales, research and trading, investment management, private equity, and private banking. Holdings Inc. appears to have bought the mortgage from Fuji at a substantial discount. Title records indicate Fuji assigned its interest in the Center West loan to Lehman Bros BROS Brothers BROS Benefits and Retirement Operations Section (King County, Washington) BROS Barnes and Richmond Operatic Society (London, UK) ., which now holds a mortgage with a revised outstanding principal balance of $54.9 million. That's thought to represent what Lehman paid for the note as well as loan fees the Center West partnership is paying its new lender. Hekmat would not specify the new loan's maturity date, referring to it only as a "short-term bridge loan" that includes no equity participation in the real estate, Center West's complaint against Fuji specified that the partnership has already invested more than $40 million in the development project. Hekmat noted with the more manageable mortgage debt in place, he expects to be "more aggressive" in leasing Center West's vacant floors. As tenants take more space, the better revenue stream should help the partnership secure new financing "well before" the Lehman Bros. mortgage matures, the developer added. Floors 16 through 21 - combining for just under 100,000 square feet - remain unleased at the 23-story tower. Hekmat, who is seeking higher-rent tenants rather than matching the competition's latest offers amid depressed market Depressed market Market in which supply overwhelms demand, leading to weak and lower prices. conditions, said he'll consider offering building-top signage to the right tenant. It's a strategy he has been reluctant to employ in the past. "We didn't design a billboard," he said. Partnership wins damages Meanwhile, in the construction contract dispute, Judge Savitch's ruling - technically a "tentative statement of decision" to which the litigants can respond before the judge's "final statement" judgment - states that building contractors building contractor n → contratista m/f de obras building contractor n → entrepreneur m (en bâtiment) building contractor must compensate the Hekmat partnership for damages tied to a delay in Center West's construction. Judge Savitch found an eight-month delay cost the developers just under $6.3 million. He calculated that Peck Jones Construction Corp. was responsible for 36 percent of the damage, contractor Otis Elevator Co. 21 percent, executive architect Daniel Mann Johnson & Mendenhall 20 percent, Center West itself 20 percent, and a window contractor 3 percent. Peck Jones attorney Mike Cathcart noted Otis had indemnified his client in the Center West contract, and hence that effectively makes the elevator contractor responsible for about 40 percent of the damages, and Peck Jones about 20 percent. The complicated dispute - originally initiated by a subcontractor One who takes a portion of a contract from the principal contractor or from another subcontractor. When an individual or a company is involved in a large-scale project, a contractor is often hired to see that the work is done. that wasn't paid and recorded a mechanics lien A mechanic's lien is a security interest in the title to property for the benefit of those who have supplied labor or materials that improve the property. The lien exists for both real property and personal property. against the property - stemmed from disagreements over Center West's construction costs and timetable. Testimony in the case took five months after four years of legal maneuverings. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion