Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,557,981 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Department of Defense news release (Nov. 15, 2005): DoD releases Selected Acquisition Reports.


The Department of Defense has released details of major defense acquisition program cost and schedule changes since the June 2005 reporting period. This information is based on the Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) submitted to the Congress for the Sept. 30, 2005, reporting period.

SARs summarize the latest estimates of cost, schedule, and technical status. These reports are prepared annually in conjunction with the president's budget. Subsequent quarterly exception reports are required for only those programs experiencing unit cost increases of at least 15 percent or schedule delays of at least six months. Quarterly SARs are also submitted for initial reports, final reports, and for programs that are rebaselined at major milestone decisions.

The total program cost estimates provided in the SARs include research and development, procurement, military construction, and acquisition-related operation and maintenance (except for pre-Milestone B programs, which are limited to development costs pursuant to 10 USC An abbreviation for U.S. Code.  2432). Total program costs reflect actual costs to date as well as future anticipated costs. All estimates include anticipated inflation allowances.

The chart at the top of the next page shows the current estimate of program acquisition costs for programs covered by SARs for the prior reporting period (June 2005), which was $1,474,049.4 million. There was a net cost increase of $64,999.4 million (+4.4 percent) during the current reporting period (September 2005), which was due primarily to cost increases associated with the four-year stretchout and restructure of the FCS FCS - Frame Check Sequence  program.

For the September 2005 reporting period, there were quarterly exception SARs submitted for 13 programs. The reasons for the submissions follow.

ARMY

ACS (Asynchronous Communications Server) See network access server.  (Aerial Common Sensor The Lockheed Martin Aerial Common Sensor (ACS) platform was a reconnaissance aircraft airframe, for the United States Army and Navy. The aircraft would have been able to detect troop movements, intercept enemy communications and radar transmissions, and communicate with other ) -- The SAR (Segmentation And Reassembly) The protocol that converts data to cells for transmission over an ATM network. It is the lower part of the ATM Adaption Layer (AAL), which is responsible for the entire operation. See AAL.

SAR - segmentation and reassembly
 was submitted to report schedule slips of at least six months due to sensor integration challenges on the selected platform resulting in space, weight, power, and cooling issues. There is currently a 90-day contract stop-work order in place. Alternative solution sets are being investigated. Impacts to performance and cost are not known at this time.

ARH ARH Agence Régionale de l'Hospitalisation
ARH Art History
ARH Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter
ARH Adolescent Reproductive Health
ARH Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia
ARH Appalachian Regional Hospital
ARH Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
 (Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter An armed reconnaissance helicopter is a light helicopter armed for self defense and rudimentary combat abilities. It can refer to any of the following.
  • Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter was a U.S. Army project to replace the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior, resulting in the Bell ARH-70.
) -- This is the initial SAR submission following approval to proceed into System Development and Demonstration (Milestone B) on July 26, 2005.

ATIRCM/CMWS ATIRCM/CMWS Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure/Common Missile Warning System  (Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure/Common Missile Warning System) -- The SAR was submitted to report schedule delays of more than 30 months for ATIRCM ATIRCM Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasures
ATIRCM Advanced Tactical Infrared Countermeasures
 Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (testing) Initial Operational Test and Evaluation - (IOT&E) The first phase of operational test and evaluation conducted on pre-protectional items, prototypes, or pilot production items and normally completed prior to the first major production decision.  (IOT & E), First Unit Equipped, and Full Rate Production (FRP). The delays result from CMWS CMWS Common Missile Warning System  acceleration and ATIRCM performance and reliability issues, which resulted in separate IOT & E and FRP decisions. Program costs decreased $8.1 million (-0.1 percent) from $4,717.0 million to $4,708.9 million, due primarily to acceleration of the A-Kit (installation kit) buy by three years.

FCS (Future Combat Systems) -- Program costs increased $62,541.4 million (+63.3 percent) from $98,878.6 million to $161,420.0 million, as a result of program restructure (+$54,270.6 million) and extension of schedule by four years (+$8,270.8 million).

JLENS JLENS Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System  (Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System) -- This is the initial SAR submission following approval to proceed into System Development and Demonstration (Milestone B) on August 5, 2005.

NAVY

CVN 21 -- The SAR was submitted to report a schedule delay of the Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) program review from June 2006 to July 2007 because of a delay in the funding of the lead ship (CVN-78). There were no cost changes reported.

DD(X) -- The SAR was submitted to report schedule slips of seven months in the decision to approve System Development and Demonstration (Milestone B) and nine months in the Lead Ship Award date. The Milestone B is currently scheduled for November 2005, and the Lead Ship Award date is planned for January 2006. Both events slipped because of continuing resolution of the DD(X) acquisition strategy. There were no cost changes reported.

H-1 Upgrades -- The SAR was submitted to report a schedule slip of eight months (from January 2006 to September 2006) in the completion of Operational Evaluation (OPEVAL OPEVAL Operational Evaluation ) Testing. This slip was due to delays in completing aircraft block modifications and Helmet Mounted System Display (HMSD HMSD Helmet Mounted Sight and Display
HMSD Hello My Sexy Darling
) issues. Incremental improvements to the HMSD are being made to address the issues. Program costs increased $28.3 million (+0.4 percent) from $8,004.5 million to $8,032.8 million, as a result primarily of an increase in RDT RDT 1. Renal dialysis treatment 2. Retinal damage threshold  & E for studies and analyses (+$10.8 million) and additional procurement funds for UH-1Y government furnished equipment and recurring costs (+$17.5 million).

LHD 1 -- This is the final SAR for the LHD 1 since it is more than 90 percent expended. The program began in 1981 and has now delivered six of seven ships to date. The final ship, LHD-8, is under construction and is scheduled to be delivered in July 2007. Program costs decreased $49.9 million (-0.5 percent) from $10,001.2 million to $9,951.3 million, due primarily to revised actual costs.

AIR FORCE

F/A-22 -- The SAR was submitted to rebaseline from a development to a production estimate following the April 2005 approval of Full Rate Production (Milestone III). There were no cost changes reported.

NPOESS NPOESS National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (US NOAA)  (National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System) -- The SAR was submitted to report an increase in the Average Procurement Unit Cost Program (APUC APUC Average Procurement Unit Cost
APUC Afghan Persons Under Control (US DoD)
APUC Anno Post Urbem Conditam (Year After the Founation of Rome, epigraphy) 
) of 15 percent or more (Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach). Congress was notified September 28, 2005, of the breach. Program costs increased $1,485.2 million (+21.8 percent) from $6,800.0 million to $8,285.2 million, due primarily to technical issues arising during the engineering and manufacturing development portion of the program. The NPOESS Tri-Agency Executive Committee (EXCOM EXCOM Executive Committee
EXCOM extended communications search (US DoD)
EXCOM District Executive Committee
EXCOM Ex-Communicated
) has directed that an Independent Program Assessment team review the program and provide recommendations for replanning options. The EXCOM is expected to approve a restructure of the program during December 2005.

SBIRS SBIRS Space-Based Infrared System
SBIRS Space Based Infra-Red Surveillance
 (Space Based Infrared System) High -- The SAR was submitted to report increases in the Program Acquisition Unit Cost and Average Procurement Unit Cost of 15 percent or more (Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach). Program costs increased $1,024.8 million (+10.7 percent) from $9,613.3 million to $10,638.1 million, due primarily to a revised estimate of development and production costs and the addition of program office operating costs to complete production of GEO 3-5.

WGS (Wideband Gapfiller Satellites) -- The SAR was submitted to report schedule slips of six months or more. The Initial Operational Capability The first attainment of the capability to employ effectively a weapon, item of equipment, or system of approved specific characteristics that is manned or operated by an adequately trained, equipped, and supported military unit or force. Also called IOC.  (IOC) slipped from May 2007 to March 2009, and Full Operational Capability (FOC) has been revised to a "to be determined" date, pending a review of satellites 4 and 5 cost and schedule. The schedule slips were due to a fastener problem in the manufacturing process reported by the contractor (Boeing). The need to go back and replace the fasteners pushed back the launch date, thus affecting the IOC and FOC dates. Program costs decreased $22.3 million (-1.2 percent) from $1,837.4 million to $1,815.1 million due primarily to a reduction to fund higher priority programs.

New SARs (As of September 30, 2005)

The Department of Defense has submitted initial SARs for two new programs. These reports do not represent cost growth. Baselines established on these programs will be the point from which future changes will be measured. The current cost estimates are shown in the sidebar to the left.
CURRENT ESTIMATE ($ IN MILLIONS)

June 2005 (85 programs)       $1,474,049.4
Changes Since Last Report:
  Economic                            $0.0
  Quantity                             0.0
  Schedule                        +7,990.0
  Engineering                    +37,405.6
  Estimating                      12,512.5
  Other                               +0.0
  Support                         +7,091.3
    Net Cost Change             $+64,999.4
September 2005 (85 programs)  $1,539,048.8

CURRENT ESTIMATE ($ IN MILLIONS)

Program
ARH (Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter)                     $3,568.7
JLENS (Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Elevated Netted    7,151.0
  Sensor System)
Total                                                    $10,719.7
COPYRIGHT 2006 Defense Acquisition University Press
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:In the News
Publication:Defense AT & L
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2006
Words:1308
Previous Article:American Forces Press Service (Nov. 7, 2005): decisions made today will give edge to tomorrow's force.(In the News)
Next Article:U.S. Transportation Command news service (Nov. 23, 2005): new cargo pallet will save U.S. military $1.3 million.(In the News)
Topics:



Related Articles
Department of Defense news release (March 11, 2005): DoD selects defense equipment for testing.(In the News)(Brief Article)
General Accounting Office (GAO) reports, studies, testimony.(POLICY & LEGISLATION)(Illustration)
Acquisition & logistics excellence: an internet listing tailored to the professional acquisition workforce; surfing the net.
Subject: Acquisition Action Plan.(Policy & Legislation)
Improvements and excellence in acquisition: Sept. 27, 2005 testimony of Kenneth J. Krieg, under secretary of defense (acquisition, technology &...
GAO reports.(Policy & Legislation)(Government Accountability Office)
Program Execution: it all comes down to making the hard decisions.(Kenneth Krieg)
Acquisition & logistics excellence: an internet listing tailored to the professional acquisition workforce.(Surfing the Net)(Directory)
Intragovernmental transactions: more important than ever for DoD's acquisition, procurement, and supply chain communities.(BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION)
Acquisition & logistics excellence: an Internet listing tailored to the professional acquisition workforce.(Surfing the Net)(Directory)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles