Democrats keep exemption.In the waning days of the Bush administration, the government ended its long-running effort to retroactively ret·ro·ac·tive adj. Influencing or applying to a period prior to enactment: a retroactive pay increase. [French rétroactif, from Latin revoke To annul or make void by recalling or taking back; to cancel, rescind, repeal, or reverse. revoke v. to annul or cancel an act, particularly a statement, document, or promise, as if it no longer existed. the tax-exempt status of a Democratic Party-affiliated organization that it claimed had improperly promoted the party's candidates. In 1985, prominent members of the Democratic Party including then-Gov. Bill Clinton formed the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC (1) (Data Link Control) See data link and OSI. (2) (Data Link Control) The data link layer protocol (layer 2) that is used in IBM's SNA networking. See SNA, data link protocol and Microsoft DLC. ) to promote social welfare and to bring about "civil betterments BETTERMENTS. Improvement's made to an estate. It signifies such improvements as have been made to the estate which render it better than mere repairs. See 2 Fairf. 482; 9 Shepl. 110; 10 Shepl. 192; 13 Ohio, R. 308; 10 Yerg. Verm. 533; 17 Verm. 109. and social improvements." The DLC applied for tax-exempt status as a social welfare organization, explaining that it was organized by Individuals concerned about national policy and the direction of policy debate within the Democratic Party. The DLC intended to create task forces, contract for studies and host fundraising events. It would also hold town meetings, issue forums and policy meetings. It said it would not intervene In campaigns or seek to influence voter perceptions. The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. granted the DLC tax-exempt status under IRC (Internet Relay Chat) Computer conferencing on the Internet. There are hundreds of IRC channels on numerous subjects that are hosted on IRC servers around the world. After joining a channel, your messages are broadcast to everyone listening to that channel. [section] 501 (c)(4). Courts have allowed 501(c)(4) organizations to engage In political activities if they operate primarily to bring about social improvements. During 1997, 1998 and 1999, the DLC hosted prominent Democratic elected officials at conferences and held events attended exclusively by Democrats. The president of the DLC stated that its activities were efforts to shift the Democratic Party's policies closer to its own policies, which could help Democrats at the polls. In 2002, the IRS issued a proposed adverse action letter revoking the DLC's tax-exempt status for 1997 and 1998 because, it said, the DLC was primarily benefiting a private group--newly elected Democrat officials and the Democratic Party--rather than the community. In 2003, the IRS proposed to revoke the DLCs exempt status for 1999. The DLC paid approximately $20,000 In taxes under protest and filed suit for a refund of the amount in the District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States). , which ruled in its favor in April 2008. The government appealed to the D.C. Circuit but agreed to a dismissal on Dec. 16, 2008. The DLC argued that it qualified as a 501(c)(4) organization during the years at issue and that the IRS improperly revoked the exempt status retroactively In violation of Treas. Reg. [section] 601.201(n)(6). Although the IRS may prospectively revoke an organization's tax-exempt status if the organization no longer qualifies for an exempt purpose, the IRS is subject to restrictions when it attempts to revoke tax-exempt status retroactively. The IRS may retroactively revoke an organization's exempt status only if the organization omits or misstates a material fact or operates In a manner materially different from that originally presented. The IRS claimed the DLCs later operations did substantially differ from its originally stated purposes. The application did not state that the DLC would attempt to reclaim centrist national policies from Republicans or to help elect a Democrat president, both of which its leaders subsequently stated as goals, the IRS chimed. Also, the government said, there was no evidence that the DLC held town meetings or issue forums or contracted for policy studies. The court recognized the IRS' primary argument that the elected officials were dominant in the creation, control and policies of the DLC but concluded that the IRS did not provide evidence of material changes In the DLC's operations. Regardless of whether the DLC held town meetings and other Intended activities, there was no evidence that it operated In a materially different manner than it had proposed, the court said. The court noted that an IRS agent who investigated the DLC's operations testified that it was operating within the terms of its exempt ruling. The court said the DLC may have been unworthy of exempt status under 501(c)(4), but the revocation The recall of some power or authority that has been granted. Revocation by the act of a party is intentional and voluntary, such as when a person cancels a Power of Attorney that he has given or a will that he has written. was a clear abuse of discretion, and the DLC was entitled to a refund. * Democratic Leadership Council Inc. v. U.S., 101 AFTR AFTR American Federal Tax Reports (Prentice-Hall) AFTR Americans For Tax Reform AFTR Air Force Training Ribbon AFTR Air Force Training Record AFTR atrophy, fasciculation, tremor, rigidity AFTR Atomic Frequency Time Reference 2d 2008-1597, appeal dismissed docket no. 08-5193 (D.C. Cir. 2008) By Jennifer Haynes, tax associate, KPMG KPMG Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (accounting firm) KPMG Kaiser Permanente Medical Group KPMG Keiner Prüft Mehr Genau (German) KPMG Kommen Prüfen Meckern Gehen , and Allen Ford, the Larry D. Horner/KPMG Professor of Accounting at the University of Kansas The University of Kansas (often referred to as KU or just Kansas) is an institution of higher learning in Lawrence, Kansas. The main campus resides atop Mount Oread. , Lawrence, Karl |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion