Defense Inventory: Control Weaknesses Leave Restricted and Hazardous Excess Property Vulnerable to Improper Use, Loss, and Theft.The Defense Department (DOD (1) (Dial On Demand) A feature that allows a device to automatically dial a telephone number. For example, an ISDN router with dial on demand will automatically dial up the ISP when it senses IP traffic destined for the Internet. ) disposes of excess property--including vehicles, weapons, hand tools, lumber, medical equipment, and furniture--and encourages the reuse reuse - Using code developed for one application program in another application. Traditionally achieved using program libraries. Object-oriented programming offers reusability of code via its techniques of inheritance and genericity. of excess property to the maximum extent possible. DOD components, civilian federal agencies, and "special programs" have equal priority and first rights to excess property. This report discusses excess property issued to three of 12 special programs--the Military Affiliate Radio System A program conducted by the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force in which amateur radio stations and operators participate in and contribute to the mission of providing auxiliary and emergency communications on a local, national, or international basis as an adjunct to normal , the Civil Air Patrol The U.S. Civil Air Patrol (CAP) is the civilian auxiliary of the United States Air Force (USAF). It was created on 1 December, 1941 by Administrative Order 9, with Maj. Gen. John F. , and the 12th Congressional Regional Equipment Center. Between 1995 and 2000, these programs obtained items that they were not eligible to receive with a total reported value of $34 million. These three special programs were able to obtain the items because the DOD facilities that store the property are not required to verify which items the programs are eligible to receive, and because program officials do not consistently follow applicable guidelines. GAO also noted that the programs' lists of property they are allowed to obtain are not comprehensive because the lists exclude mission-related items similar to those already permitted. Further these programs did not have reliable records for over three-quarters of their excess property. Together, the three special programs obtained over 80,000 hazardous supplies. In many cases, program officials were unaware that their programs had received such items. GAO also found similar problems in other special programs. This lack of accountability increases the risk of mishandling excess property and the potential for waste, fraud, and abuse. GAO-02-75 January 25, 2002 |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion