Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Decision in Legal Appeal.


Business Editors

CAMPBELL, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 8, 2002

FOCUS Enhancements, Inc. (NASDAQ NASDAQ
 in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations

U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on
: FCSE FCSE Frequency Control Symposium and Exhibition ) announced today that in its appeal of the judgment awarded to CRA See Community Reinvestment Act.  Systems, Inc., of Waco, Texas For the Branch Davidian siege in Waco, Texas, see .

For other uses of "Waco", see Waco (disambiguation).
Waco (pronounced: /ˈweɪkoʊ/) is the county seat of McLennan County, Texas.
, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed the judgment virtually in its entirety. A jury trial in May 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco, Texas (Civil No. W-99-CA-031) had ended in a verdict in favor of CRA that formed the basis for the judgment. On October 27, 2000, Focus filed with the court a supersedeas bond A bond that a court requires from an appellant who wants to delay payment of a judgment until the appeal is over.

An appellant's bond to stay execution on a judgment during the pendency of the appeal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d); Fed. R. App. P. 8(b).
 in the approximate amount of $2.3 million (being the approximate amount of the judgment plus 10% to cover interest and costs of CRA). During the third quarter of 2000, the Company recorded a charge to operations to establish a legal reserve for such amount.

As a result of the legal reserve and the posting of the bond, this judgment will have little or no effect on the Company's working capital or operating results on a go forward basis.

Statements about future results made in the above referenced (press release/presentation/conference call) constitute forward-looking statements forward-looking statement

A projected financial statement based on management expectations. A forward-looking statement involves risks with regard to the accuracy of assumptions underlying the projections.
 within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and  of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations and the current economic environment. The Company cautions that these statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such projections are based upon many estimates and are inherently subject to significant economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of management of FOCUS. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are specified in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 and other filings with the SEC by both FOCUS and Videonics.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 8, 2002
Words:321
Previous Article:Register.com's 2001 Fourth Quarter and Year End Financial Results Conference Call Available on the Web.
Next Article:OakScape to Participate at 2002 CES Federal IT Pavilion.
Topics:



Related Articles
Kalikow, Council continue appeals.
Taxation of contingent fee awards.
AIRPORT FIGHT AT HIGH LEVEL; BURBANK'S VETO POWER UP TO SUPREME COURT?
CITY TO REVIEW FINE FOR SPILL.
Judicial review bills seek to strengthen veterans' rights. (Legislative Update).
Nurse loses EI appeal at court.
Effects of ruling on coho disputed.
State to Lane: Step aside.
Malkin prepares for next round in decade-long Helmsley dispute.
MAYOR TO TAKE LAUSD CASE TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles