Printer Friendly

Debate on forest fire policy.

Debate on forest fire policy

As forest fires left their mark on over 5 million acres of U.S. land last year, several groups called for a return to the pre-1972 policy of totally suppressing all forest fires in parks and wilderness areas. This worried ecologists who believe naturally lit fires can often benefit an ecosystem. However, judging from testimony before Congress last week, the nation will not revert to total fire suppression in the wilderness.

In their testimony before a joint hearing of the House Interior Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands and the Agriculture Subcommittee on Forests, Family Farms and Energy, several different forestry organizations and wilderness groups supported the main tenets of the current national fire program, although they added that the policy needs revision. Some groups also questioned whether park and wilderness area managers have been correctly implementing the "prescribed natural burn" policy. This policy allows managers of wilderness areas and natural parks to permit certain naturally lit fires to burn, as long as those fires do not endanger people, property or natural and cultural features. The policy also authorizes managers to set intentional fires to decrease the risk of uncontrollable future wildfires (SN: 11/12/88, p.316).

In general, the groups supported the findings of an inter-agency Fire Management Review Team that submitted its report late last year. Among its conclusions, the team suggested that agencies reaffirm and strengthen their prescribed natural fire policies. This assessment did not receive good marks from all, however. The National Forest Products Association, a group of forest land owners and forest product manufacturers, criticized the findings of the review team, saying it ignored the limitations imposed by the effort to decrease the federal deficit. A staffer with the National Parks subcommittee said this hearing will affect how Congress decides to allocate money for firefighting efforts in the 1990 budget.
COPYRIGHT 1989 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1989, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science News
Date:Feb 11, 1989
Words:312
Previous Article:Short-circuiting spinach with platinum.
Next Article:Potential replacement for ozone killer.
Topics:


Related Articles
Yellowstone and the let-burn policy; the fires that hopscotched across half the Park last summer also fueled a debate that may change the way we...
Report on our stressed-out forests.
A national urban forests policy: it's about time!
Wildfire update.
Canada blazing: unprecedented fire losses last year and persistent drought conditions are making officials fear the summer of '90.
Burning questions: sifting through the ashes for a verdict on Yosemite's 'prescribed burns.' (Cover Story)
Fire strategy for our sick forests.
Fighting fire with new ideas.
Prescribed fire burns out of control.
Washington outlook.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters