Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,719,120 articles and books

Dear EarthTalk: What's the deal nowadays with aerosol spray cans? I thought that the ozone-depleting chemicals used in them were eliminated back in the 1970s. Is this true? If so, what is now used as a propellant? Are aerosols still bad for the ozone layer?



Dear EarthTalk: What's the deal nowadays with aerosol spray cans? I thought that the ozone-depleting chemicals used in them were eliminated back in the 1970s. Is this true? If so, what is now used as a propellant pro·pel·lant also pro·pel·lent  
n.
1. Something, such as an explosive charge or a rocket fuel, that propels or provides thrust.

2.
? Are aerosols still bad for the ozone layer?--Sheila, Abilene, TX

The aerosol spray can has a storied history in the United States. First invented in the 1920s by U.S. Department of Agriculture scientists to pressurize pres·sur·ize  
tr.v. pres·sur·ized, pres·sur·iz·ing, pres·sur·iz·es
1. To maintain normal air pressure in (an enclosure, as an aircraft or submarine).

2.
 insect spray, American soldiers eventually used the technology to help ward off Malaria in the South Pacific during World War II. The aerosol spray cans today, while much smaller and more refined, are direct descendents of those original military grade clunkers. Use of the cans for consumer applications took off during the ensuing decades, until the mid-1970s when ozone depletion first came to the public's attention.

As a result, consumer aerosol products made in the U.S. have not contained ozone-depleting chemicals--also known as chlorofluorocarbons chlorofluorocarbons (klōr'əflr`əkär'bənz, klôr'–) (CFCs), organic compounds that contain carbon, chlorine, and fluorine atoms.  (CFCs)--since the late 1970s, first because companies voluntary eliminated them, and later because of federal regulations. Clean Air Act and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  (EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.

EPA
abbr.
eicosapentaenoic acid


EPA,
n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic.

EPA,
n.
) regulations further restricted the use of CFCs for non-consumer products. All consumer and most other aerosol products made or sold in the U.S. now use propellants--such as hydrocarbons and compressed gases like nitrous nitrous /ni·trous/ (ni´trus) pertaining to nitrogen in its lowest valency.

nitrous oxide  a gas, N2O, used as a general anesthetic, usually in combination with another agent.
 oxide--that do not deplete de·plete
v.
1. To use up something, such as a nutrient.

2. To empty something out, as the body of electrolytes.
 the ozone layer. Aerosol spray cans produced in some other countries might still utilize CFCs, but they cannot legally be sold in the U.S.

According to the industry trade group, the National Aerosol Association, aerosol manufacturers in Europe and other parts of the world initially did not follow the lead of U.S. industry in substituting alternative propellants for CFCs. "The fact that aerosols made in underdeveloped countries may contain CFCs has caused confusion in press reports and in the public mind about the stratospheric ozone/aerosol link," reports the group. Other countries have also switched out ozone-depleting propellants with non-depleting forms because they signed 1987's Montreal Protocol, a landmark international agreement signed by 191 countries with the goal of phasing out the production and use of CFCs and other ozone depleting chemicals. Scientists report that that the phase out of the chemicals is now about 90 percent complete.

Of course, just because those deodorant deodorant /de·odor·ant/ (de-o´der-int)
1. masking offensive odors.

2. an agent that so acts.


de·o·dor·ant
n.
 sprays and shaving cream cans aren't depleting the ozone layer doesn't mean they are actually good for the environment. They still contain hydrocarbons and/or compressed gases notorious for their contribution to global warming. Every time you hit the button, then, you are raising your carbon footprint, albeit ever so slightly.

Modern-day, CFC-free aerosol sprays also emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that contribute to ground-level ozone levels, a key component of asthma-inducing smog. The state of California is now regulating consumer products that contain VOCs--and aerosol sprays are not the only targets: Fingernail fin·ger·nail
n.
The nail on a finger.
 polish, perfumes, mouthwashes, pump hair sprays, and roll-on and stick deodorants also emit them.

CONTACTS: National Aerosol Association, www.nationalaerosol.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Earth Action Network, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:EarthTalk: Questions & Answers About Our Environment. A Weekly Column
Date:Aug 31, 2008
Words:494
Previous Article:Dear Earth Talk: I've heard that increasing eco-awareness around the world has now extended itself to the afterlife, whereby burials can even be...
Next Article:Dear EarthTalk: What's the story with animal cloning? Is the meat industry really cloning animals now to "beef up" production?
Topics:



Related Articles
Ozone controversy lifts off in Congress.
Lungs hurt most by ozone-acid synergy.
Europe to ban CFCs by 2000.
UV hazard: ozone lost versus ozone gained.
Drop in ozone killers means global gain.
Ozone killer confounds expectations.
The Hole in the Sky.
MEXICO HALTS PRODUCTION OF CHEMICALS HARMFUL TO OZONE LAYER.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters