Printer Friendly
The Free Library
7,774,290 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Davis v. Castleberry.


U.S. District Court

PAT SEARCH

Davis v. Castleberry, 364 F.Supp.2d 319 (W.D.N.Y. 2005). An inmate brought a civil rights action against a corrections officer The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page.
 who allegedly touched his penis during a pat frisk, and prison employees who investigated and denied his grievance. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. The court held that even assuming that the officer touched the inmate's penis during a pat frisk performed before the inmate entered a prison exercise yard, the conduct did not violate the Eighth Amendment because it was proper for the officer to have conducted the search and such a search could involve the genital area. The court noted that inmate grievance procedures A term used in Labor Law to describe an orderly, established way of dealing with problems between employers and employees.

Through the grievance procedure system, workers' complaints are usually communicated through their union to management for consideration by the employer.
 are not even constitutionally required, and therefore an inmate's mere disagreement with the outcome of his grievance will not give rise to a constitutional claim. (Southport Correctional Facility The Southport Correctional Facility is an ultra-maximum-security, or "supermax," prison in New York State, USA. It is located in the town of Southport, New York, in upstate Chemung County. , New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:strip searches
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:149
Previous Article:Wilson v. City of Fountain Valley.(SEARCHES)(violated constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Doe v. Moore.(SEARCHES)(violation of due process rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: BODY CAVITY SEARCH STRIP SEARCH.(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court searches. (Female Prisoners).(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court searches separation. (Pretrial Detention).(Brief Article)
Loeber v. County Of Albany.(administrative segregation)(Brief Article)
Turner v. Kight.(strip searches suit)(Brief Article)
Murcia v. County of Orange.(strip searches)(Brief Article)
Wood v. Hancock County.(violation of civil rights, strip searches)(Brief Article)
N.G. v. Connecticut.(violation of United States Constitution. 4th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Reynolds v. City of Anchorage.(juvenile alleges warrantless strip search)(Brief Article)
Reynolds v. City of Anchorage.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles