Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,529 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Davidson v. Murray.


U.S. District Court

TELEPHONE

Davidson v. Murray, 371 F.Supp.2d 361 (W.D.N.Y. 2005). A state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 brought a [section] 1983 action against a state corrections department, officers and prison officials, alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement during his incarceration Confinement in a jail or prison; imprisonment.

Police officers and other law enforcement officers are authorized by federal, state, and local lawmakers to arrest and confine persons suspected of crimes. The judicial system is authorized to confine persons convicted of crimes.
. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The court found that thirty-day keeplock confinement and loss of telephone privileges imposed on the prisoner as a disciplinary sanction did not deprive the prisoner of his procedural due process rights. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, denial of basic hygiene items and cleaning supplies, such as toothpaste, soap, toilet tissue and cell cleaning items, did not violate the prisoner's Eighth Amendment rights. (Attica Correctional Facility, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:120
Previous Article:Gilmore v. County of Douglas, State of Neb.(Gilmore v. County of Douglas, State of Neb., 406 F.3d 935)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Gonzalez v. Narcato.(Gonzalez v. Narcato, 363 F.Supp.2d 486 )(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
DANDY BY ANDY; HART'S DAVIDSON BLANKS VALENCIA WITH TWO-HITTER : HART 7, VALENCIA 0.(SPORTS)
ANAHEIM PRAISES PRESSLER EX-DISNEY EXEC BOOSTED DUCKS, ANGELS.(Sports)
George Franki & Clyde Slatyer. Mad Harry: Australia's Most Decorated Soldier.(Book Review)
Sodomy criminals no more: the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas may clear the records of those convicted under sodomy laws--including the...
The first free state project: the brief, tumultuous history of Franklin.
MARSHFIELD HIGH SCHOOL.(Schools)
OSU suffers first loss.(Sports)(Michael Clegg's free kick gives Saint Mary's a 1-0 victory over Oregon State in men's soccer)
Davidson v. Murray.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Walking with the legends: National Club Championship delivers a winning golf experience.(sports)
Controversies in Criminal Justice: Contemporary Readings.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles