Printer Friendly

Darwin's no help on the origins of greed

The posters outside the Natural History museum's Darwin exhibition have a wary feel. They show the old boy shushing at the passers-by with a forefinger forefinger /fore·fin·ger/ (-fing-ger) index finger; the second finger, counting the thumb as first.

fore·fin·ger
n.
See index finger.
 over his lips and a worried look in his eyes. Inside, the curators explain how he sat on his theory of evolution for fear of its social consequences with the help of a letter he wrote to his friend, Joseph Hooker. In 1844, 15 years before he found the courage to publish On the Origin of Species, he said: 'I am almost convinced that species are not (it is like confessing a murder) immutable IMMUTABLE. What cannot be removed, what is unchangeable. The laws of God being perfect, are immutable, but no human law can be so considered. .'

Henry Kissinger is meant to have come up with the witticism that 'academic politics are so bitter because the stakes are so low'. Many contest his claim on the line, but if it was his he was as wrong about intellectual life as about so much else. The stakes in the academic politics of evolution have always been high, and Darwin was right to think of murder.

Rapacious capitalists used Darwinism to justify extremes of wealth. Fascists and racists used it to justify mass murder. In the Sixties the understandable backlash against 'scientific' racism went to the opposite extreme, creating a biology riddled with taboos and no-go areas. To say that humans were as much the product of evolution as any other animal was like announcing you had joined the Nazis. In 1975, the colleagues of EO Wilson shamefully abused the Harvard scientist for daring to argue that biology influenced human behaviour. The American Anthropological Association American Anthropological Association was founded in 1902 and claims to be, "the world's largest professional organization of individuals interested in anthropology".  claimed he had attempted 'to justify genetically the sexist, racist and elitist e·lit·ism or é·lit·ism  
n.
1. The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
 status quo [Latin, The existing state of things at any given date.] Status quo ante bellum means the state of things before the war. The status quo to be preserved by a preliminary injunction is the last actual, peaceable, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.  in human society' (an act of intellectual thuggery Time magazine likened to the Catholic church's denunciation DENUNCIATION, crim. law. This term is used by the civilians to signify the act by which au individual informs a public officer, whose duty it is to prosecute offenders, that a crime has been committed. It differs from a complaint. (q.v.) Vide 1 Bro. C. L. 447; 2 Id. 389; Ayl. Parer.  of Galileo).

But Wilson won in the end. Academic policemen could not rule scientific arguments out of bounds indefinitely because they did not like the political consequences. The exercise was pointless as well as unprincipled, because the political uses and abuses of science are so varied. Sociobiology sociobiology, controversial field that studies how natural selection, previously used only to explain the evolution of physical characteristics, shapes behavior in animals and humans.  did not necessarily lead to 'racism', 'sexism', 'elitism' or any other 'ism'. It could just as easily prompt the liberal thought that because we had evolved a universal human nature we were all entitled to universal human rights. If the Natural History museum had opened its exhibition at the turn of this century, its staff would have been at one with intellectuals enjoying their freedom to argue without being shouted down. With Marx and Freud discredited, Darwin was the last of the big thinkers whose reputation was undiminished. He had settled the question of how life developed. The sociobiologists of the late Nineties dreamt they could go further and settle just about everything else.

In Philosophers' magazine, Jeremy Stangroom described a euphoric debate on the boundless possibilities for scientific advance. Ian McEwan Ian McEwan CBE (born June 21, 1948) is an English novelist. Biography
McEwan was born in Aldershot in England and spent much of his childhood in East Asia, Germany and North Africa, where his army officer father was posted.
 told the audience: 'I have stood back amazed, as things that were once the preserve of poets, philosophers and fiction writers, have been drawn into the great maws of experimental science: reputation, gratitude, cheating, and on a grander level, human beauty and beyond that, mind, consciousness and human nature. These were once not respectable subjects for scientific enquiry, but in 20 years this has all changed.'

Almost a decade on, and McEwan and the poets have been reprieved. The millennial hopes of finding the biological causes for everything from gratitude to the appreciation of beauty have faded. The trouble with sociobiology was always that you could invent apparently convincing explanations for contradictory forms of human behaviour. Take sex. If men were solely monogamous or serially monogamous, occasionally adulterous or incessantly treacherous, bigamous big·a·mous  
adj.
1. Involving bigamy.

2. Guilty of bigamy.



biga·mous·ly adv.

Adj. 1.
, polygamous polygamous

as a male or female, having more than one mate.
 or merely libidinous li·bid·i·nous
adj.
Having or exhibiting lustful desires; lascivious.
, there was a superficially plausible account of how their behaviour evolved in pre-history. Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College, London, can make up pseudo-scientific theories off the top of his head. He told me the best thing about playing Darwinian party tricks was that no one could falsify falsify,
v to forge; to give a false appearance to anything, as to falsify a record.
 your conclusions in a controlled experiment because no one could travel back in time to study our African ancestors.

Jones and other sceptical biologists dismiss conjectures about the evolution of human behaviour as Just So Stories ... Kipling told us 'How the Camel Got His Hump'; socio-biologists tell the tale of 'Why Humans Get the Hump'. The first is fiction, the second may as well be.

Along with Just So ... I think we need also say: 'So what?' After the freethinkers freethinkers, those who arrive at conclusions, particularly in questions of religion, by employing the rules of reason while rejecting supernatural authority or ecclesiastical tradition.  had faced down the intimidation of the Sixties generation of academics, the results of their research were trite, even when true. For all his doubts about sociobiology, Jones accepts there is an evolutionary explanation for why old men desire beautiful young women and why rich old men are more successful in bedding beautiful young women than poor old men - but, well, the reason is no mystery.

I remember an evolutionary psychologist telling a meeting in the Nineties that step-parents were more likely to murder children than natural parents who shared a child's DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
. One over-wrought speaker bellowed that those who denied the truth of his findings had 'blood on their hands'. Clearly, what he said about comparative murder rates was right. Equally clearly, the overwhelming majority of step-parents do not murder their stepchildren. His sociobiological so·ci·o·bi·ol·o·gy  
n.
The study of the biological determinants of social behavior, based on the theory that such behavior is often genetically transmitted and subject to evolutionary processes.
 truth is thus no help to social workers trying to save the life of the next Baby P.

Niall Ferguson ends the book of his TV series The Ascent of Money saying we should see finance as a product of evolution. He explains the boom-and-bust cycle by tapping into research that we are hard-wired not to think logically. It is fascinating, but sceptical economists provide better explanations than biologists for why crowds go mad in a bubble market. Financial and political leaders led us to ruin because they did not understand Keynes, not Darwin.

The cautious old man with the flowing beard outside the Natural History museum is a realistic Darwin for our grim times: rightly nervous and well aware of the dangers of going too far too fast.
Copyright 2008 guardian.co.uk
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:guardian.co.uk
Publication:guardian.co.uk
Date:Nov 16, 2008
Words:997
Previous Article:Geek gurus: The rise of social psychology
Next Article:Looking the truth right in the eye


Related Articles
Seeing business through science. (WIP).
Quammen, David. The reluctant Mr. Darwin; an intimate portrait of Charles Darwin and the making of his theory of evolution.
Charles Darwin and The Origin of Species.
Darwin's Origin of species; a biography.
Browne, Janet. Darwin's Origin of Species, a biography.
The issue at hand.
Darwin's shadow: context and reception in the western world.
UO lectures to mark Darwin anniversaries.
Darwin letter goes on sale

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters