Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,672,661 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Dam facts.


In last issue's editorial, "Katrina KATRINA Keeping All the Resources in New Orleans Alive
KATRINA Krewe Aiding Trash Removal In the New Orleans Area
 Storm Warnings," I was disappointed to see that your writers did not do their homework regarding the maintenance of the almost 400 miles of levees around the New Orleans New Orleans (ôr`lēənz –lənz, ôrlēnz`), city (2006 pop. 187,525), coextensive with Orleans parish, SE La., between the Mississippi River and Lake Pontchartrain, 107 mi (172 km) by water from the river mouth; founded  region. The article incorrectly states that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was responsible for the maintenance of these structures before Katrina hit. Nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, while many levees throughout the country have been constructed by the Corps of Engineers, most of these levees are turned over to local entities for maintenance. In the case of the levees in New Orleans, maintenance responsibility fell solely to the local levee levee (lĕv`ē) [Fr.,=raised], embankment built along a river to prevent flooding by high water. Levees are the oldest and the most extensively used method of flood control.  boards, not the Corps of Engineers. The only levees maintained by the Corps of Engineers in the New Orleans area are the levees along the Mississippi River Mississippi River

River, central U.S. It rises at Lake Itasca in Minnesota and flows south, meeting its major tributaries, the Missouri and the Ohio rivers, about halfway along its journey to the Gulf of Mexico.
. Those levees remain intact, unlike those maintained by the local levee boards.

G. Bowman

Via e-mail
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:letters to the editor
Author:Bowman, G.
Publication:National Review
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Sep 25, 2006
Words:153
Previous Article:Debating over a corpse?(on the right)(Joseph Lieberman's political tale)
Next Article:Gray-haired wisdom.(letters to the editor)(Letter to the editor)



Related Articles
Microsoft-Sponsored Bogus Letter Campaign an Affront.(Microsoft's anticompetitive practices case)(Brief Article)(Letter to the Editor)
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
PARKS SAYS PLAN BEING SNUBBED OPTIONAL DESIGN FOR DAM GETTING THE COLD SHOULDER.(News)
CITY WILL ALLOW DISPUTED DAM TO MOVE AHEAD.(News)
MAYOR PARKS DISPUTES BASIN LETTER CLAIM.(News)
BASEBALL LEAGUE HOPES TO BUILD ADDITIONAL FIELDS; PARKS OFFICIALS EYEING LAND FOR OTHER USE.(News)
LETTERS BUILD DAM DEBATE; MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS EXPRESS OPPOSITION, SUPPORT FOR LANG RANCH PROJECT.(News)
LEADERS SEEK RESIDENT PROTECTIONS FOR FAIR.(News)
Rift widens over EWEB fish ladder.(Utilities)(A plan to haul rare fish around Trail Bridge Dam creates division on the board)
Group threatens suit over Willamette's fish.(Environment)(Willamette Riverkeeper, which has worked closely with the Army Corps of Engineers, says...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles