Printer Friendly
The Free Library
6,672,335 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT REQUESTED TAX SPENDING IN DISPUTE.


Byline: Naush Boghossian Staff Writer

STEVENSON RANCH Stevenson Ranch, California (in the 91381 ZIP Code) is a Los Angeles County, USA, unincorporated community west of Santa Clarita a few miles south of Six Flags Magic Mountain amusement park. The Stevenson Ranch fountain was redone in 2007.  - The county has asked a Superior Court judge to dismiss a Stevenson Ranch man's lawsuit lawsuit: see procedure; tort.  that says Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850.  County illegally spent special tax district money to build a new elementary school elementary school: see school. .

In a motion filed Thursday Thursday: see week. , the county counsel claims that resident Anthony Moskal's lawsuit has no legal basis.

Moskal Moskal is a common surname in Central and Eastern Europe.

The word means Russian, or more exactly, "Muscovite" (a person from Moscow or Muscovy) in some Slavic languages, such as Polish and Ukrainian), but today is largely considered an archaism and often perceived as an
 sued, claiming state law requires that special Mello-Roos tax money from his neighborhood be spent on improvements specific to those residents. Before development began, Stevenson Ranch developers agreed to a tax plan on each phase of the project to fund public services Public services is a term usually used to mean services provided by government to its citizens, either directly (through the public sector) or by financing private provision of services.  such as roads and flood control.

The lawsuit claims that that the county spent money collected from more than 1,600 residents in Area B of the Stevenson Ranch tax district on facilities beyond that area, including Pico Canyon Elementary School, which Area B children will not attend.

``We believe that the special taxes levied against Improvement Area B are valid and fully comply with the Mello-Roos Act and are consistent with the 1989 resolution that formed the community facilities district in Stevenson Ranch,'' said Warren Wellen, senior deputy county counsel.

The county counsel also issued a report to the Board of Supervisors on how the special tax district money was spent in Stevenson Ranch. The board requested that report after Moskal sued.

Moskal's attorney said his client has a good case.

``The demurrer demurrer

In law, a plea in response to an allegation that admits its truth but also asserts that it is not sufficient as a cause of action. In the U.S., demurrers are no longer used in federal procedure (having been replaced by motions to dismiss or motions for more definite
 (motion to dismiss) shows some desperate arguments,'' attorney Craig Collins said. He will ask the court to deny the county's motion when it is heard May 7.

Stevenson Ranch homeowners live in a tax district approved in 1989 by the county and set up in three phases for different geographic areas.

Homeowners pay a special Mello-Roos tax - $1,093 to $3,636 annually for 25 years - in addition to their property taxes.

In 2001, the county Board of Supervisors The examples and perspective in this article or section may represent an unduly geographically limited view of the subject.
Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page.
The Board of Supervisors is the body governing counties in the U.S.
 approved issuing about $16 million in bonds to be paid back by special taxes levied against Area B - where Moskal lives - to help build the school.

Moskal is asking that the county stop spending the $16 million outside Area B, repay residents the portion of the money spent outside the area and to either spend the money for improvements to Area B or retire the May 2000 bond.

While the county is challenging the merits of the lawsuit, three other families in Stevenson Ranch have filed claims - prerequisites to filing lawsuits - with the county seeking refunds equaling the portion of the May 2001 Mello-Roos money spent outside of their area.

Louis and Helen Bovasso, Joy Carpenter and Marc Dumlao, and David Friedrich filed the claims and could either join Moskal's lawsuit or file a separate suit of their own.

``We intend to proceed on behalf of these three additional people and any other people in Stevenson Ranch that oppose the illegal tax,'' Moskal said.

Officials from the county as well as Stevenson Ranch's developer, Lennar Communities, have maintained that the county is permitted to spend money outside the district - or areas, in this case - if the service or facilities benefit the homeowners in the district. As an example, they point to a bridge that is open to the general public.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Apr 5, 2003
Words:533
Previous Article:AREA MAN TRACK TROOPS WITH SON IN IRAQ, HE'S KEEPING TABS ON ALL LOCAL FIGHTERS.(News)
Next Article:SERGEANT EAGER TO RETURN TO FAMILY, GARDEN.(News)



Related Articles
DISTRICT FREE FROM LAWSUIT SLAIN TEEN'S MOM DENIED.(News)
FAMILY CAN'T SUE FOR BIAS REST OF SUIT IN TEEN'S DEATH CAN BE AMENDED.(News)
LEGAL FEES ON RISE IN AGOURA HILLS\Annual bill could reach $500,000 if cases go to trial, officials\say.(NEWS)(Statistical Data Included)
WILLIAMS RECEPTIVE TO WAIVER : POLICE CHIEF WILLING TO CLEAR WAY FOR COMMISSION REVIEW.(NEWS)
Make `em pay up: document the scope of an engagement - and make sure the client understands.
HOW WERE TAXES SPENT? ANTONOVICH DEMANDS FULL ACCOUNTING.(News)
JUDGE REFUSES TO REINSTATE DISCRIMINATION CASE.(News)
Pooh judge to answer bias charge.(Up Front)
Court reverses Taubman decision.(Taubman Centers)
A marvelous system to avoid.(avoiding legal system in dealing with problems)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles