Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,651,165 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

DEVELOPER OFF THE HOOK FOR LEGAL FEES, JUDGE RULES.


Byline: Sylvia L. Oliande Daily News Staff Writer

A Superior Court judge ruled that the developers of Hidden Creek Ranch ranch, large farm devoted chiefly to raising and breeding cattle, horses, sheep, and goats. The cattle ranch was introduced from Latin America to Texas and the plains of the W United States and Canada.  did not have to pay the legal costs the Environmental Coalition incurred when it defended its referendum referendum, referral of proposed laws or constitutional amendments to the electorate for final approval. This direct form of legislation, along with the initiative, was known in Greece and other early democracies.  from a lawsuit lawsuit: see procedure; tort. .

Oxnard-based attorney Richard Francis Richard Francis (dates unknown) was a famous English cricketer who played for the Hambledon Club.

Francis is known to have been a Surrey man by birth and he had played for Surrey teams before moving to Hampshire. He made 47 known first-class appearances from 1773 until 1793.
 had filed the motion in connection with a suit brought on by Messenger Investment Co. against the city of Moorpark and the environmental coalition.

The suit challenged the placement of a referendum against the 3,221-home project on a special election ballot.

Judge Thomas J. Hutchins denied the motion Wednesday but left the door open for it to be refiled because he based his decision on the fact that Glen Reiser, the lead attorney for the developer, left his law firm this month to take a seat on a Superior Court bench.

Hutchins noted that the papers filed in opposition to the fee request were written by Reiser and would not be familiar to a new attorney on the case.

``I'd appreciate not even to enter the water on this,'' Hutchins said. ``I'm going to deny this without prejudice Without any loss or waiver of rights or privileges.

When a lawsuit is dismissed, the court may enter a judgment against the plaintiff with or without prejudice. When a lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice
 and let it come back. That would make me more comfortable.''

While Francis said in court that he thought Hutchin's decision was a practical move, he later said he had been surprised and disappointed when he heard the judge's tentative tentative,
adj not final or definite, such as an experimental or clinical finding that has not been validated.
 ruling.

``There are a lot of issues to be resolved,'' he said, outside the courtroom. ``I would rather it be resolved, than be deferred.''

William Paterson Several notable individuals have been named William Paterson:
  • William Paterson (banker) (1658-1719), Scottish trader, a founder of the Bank of England, deviser of the DariĆ©n scheme
  • William Paterson (jurist) (1745-1806), American statesman, signed US Constitution
, a partner in Reiser's old firm - Ventura-based Ferguson Case Orr Paterson & Cunningham LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , represented the developer in court Wednesday, but he said he was not sure how the case is going to be handled in the future.

Hutchins also noted that he was inclined to rule against the fee motion because the developer, through Reiser, has appealed the ruling he made on the case in November.

Hutchins said then that the developer's assertion that there were fatal flaws in the referendum being passed around for signatures was unfounded and allowed it to remain on Tuesday's ballot.

Francis filed to gain attorney's fees attorney's fee n. the payment for legal services. It can take several forms: 1) hourly charge, 2) flat fee for the performance of a particular service (like $250 to write a will), 3) contingent fee (such as one-third of the gross recovery, and nothing if there is no  from the developer, stating also that he would ask that the city, his co-defendant, be made to pay as well since it did nothing to help fight the suit.

The two sides are expected to be back in Hutchin's chambers Monday for the first hearing on another lawsuit, the coalition's challenge to the environmental impact report created for the development.

The group maintains that the report should have been reopened to study the impact of several road improvements that were included in the development agreement at the 11th hour before it was approved by the City Council in August.

Hutchins said Wednesday that if Reiser was the lead attorney on that case as well, he might be inclined to delay that case until another attorney is caught up.
COPYRIGHT 1999 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Jan 7, 1999
Words:479
Previous Article:HIDDEN CREEK MEETING DRAWS MIXED GROUP.(News)
Next Article:CHAPLAIN ACCUSED OF TELLING SECRETS.(News)



Related Articles
Co-op converter prevails. (David Goldstick)
CHALLENGE TO PROJECT THROWN OUT; JUDGE DISMISSES SUIT OVER HIDDEN CREEK.(NEWS)
JUDGE FAVORS CITY, DENIES ARBITRATION ON ROAD EXTENSION.(News)
JUDGE REQUESTED TO INTERVENE IN BORCHARD ROAD CONTROVERSY.(News)
T.O. TO APPEAL RULING THAT IT CHARGED TOO MUCH.(News)
2 PERCENT GRADE STAYS IN PROPOSAL FOR BORCHARD ROAD.(News)
SOAR RULING COSTS MOORPARK COUNCIL.(News)
MOORPARK MUST PAY LEGAL FEES; JUDGE LIMITS SUM TO EXPENSES.(NEWS)
CITY SET TO LOSE OVER $1.3 MILLION IN FEE OVERCHARGE.(News)
BRIEFLY HOMELAND TEAM TRAINING OFFICERS.(News)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles