Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,491,363 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

DECISION ON HIV REPORTING HAILED.


Byline: Dennis Anderson Associated Press

One of the major groups that helps the AIDS and HIV community applauded Wednesday the California Medical Association's reversal of its earlier policy that favored mandatory reporting of positive HIV tests.

On Tuesday, the state association voted to revamp its policy supporting mandatory HIV reporting in favor of a plan that preserves patient privacy.

Details of that plan are yet to be worked out.

Tuesday's vote at the association's annual convention in Anaheim acknowledged that patients at risk of being infected with the virus that causes AIDS might avoid testing if they knew their names might be reported to local health officials, doctors said.

People at risk of infection fear discrimination in housing, employment and insurance.

"We do not want to do anything that would deter individuals from presenting themselves for testing," association spokeswoman Danielle Walters said.

The reversal will encourage people to keep coming in for tests, the deputy executive director of the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Services Center said.

"It was a bad public policy position," Darrell Cummings said. "It's good to know that the state's medical health association (now) supports people's confidentiality."

The greatest significance of the association's decision is that it may present an obstacle to legislation making reporting of HIV infection mandatory, Cummings said.

"It takes a little steam out of the legislation," Cummings said.

The physicians group is one of the most influential in helping shape state health policy.

Advocates of mandatory reporting contend such information disclosure ensures that a person's sexual partners will be notified.

The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Services Center provides about 800 anonymous HIV tests each month. Cummings said surveys indicate there could be a drop of as much as 90 percent in testing if it were known the results would be passed on to health officials.

Twenty-five states require confidential reporting of HIV-infected individuals by name to local health authorities. California does not require reporting of HIV infection.

COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Statistical Data Included
Date:Mar 7, 1996
Words:326
Previous Article:DUO MAKES MARATHON FAMILY FUN.(NEWS)
Next Article:CARETAKER ARRESTED IN JEWELRY ROBBERY.(NEWS)



Related Articles
Early AZT use slows progression to AIDS.
Blind data; why the life's gone out of the government's vital statistics. (dealing with Department of Health and Human Services documents)
Large-scale AIDS vaccine test delayed.
HIV photos may bode ill for vaccine. (photos of HIV attacking cells)
FEWER SUCCUMB TO AIDS IN U.S.; COUNTY DEATHS ALSO DECREASE.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
NEW AIDS DRUGS CLOSER TO APPROVAL.(News)
Young people and HIV/AIDS.
HIV/AIDS rates to fall in So. Africa?(Health)
Significant issue.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles