DAILY POST YOUR VOICE IN VALES: Just why do clergy side with the BNP?CHRISTIANS believe that we are all equal before God. The British National Party
They deny it but do openly call for the voluntary repatriation Repatriation The process of converting a foreign currency into the currency of one's own country. Notes: If you are American, converting British Pounds back to U.S. dollars is an example of repatriation. of immigrants to "their lands of ethnic origin". Many Christians - and people of other and no faith - don't accept the BNP's denials and say that this party's adherents believe some human beings are different from, and indeed are better than, others by definition of race alone. And from a Christian standpoint, that makes adherence to this party morally incompatible with the principles of belief set out in Holy Scripture. The logic of the argument is hard to fault but until now it has been down to the individual Christian, clergy or otherwise, to work that out for themselves. That was until yesterday, when the General Synod of the Church of England Church of England: see England, Church of. voted overwhelmingly in favour of measures to stop clergy being members of the British National Party. The proposal followed the publication last year of a list of 12,000 names of BNP BNP B-type natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide Physiology A 32-residue peptide hormone produced predominantly in the ventricles, secreted in response to fluid overload–eg, CHF. See Atrial natriuretic peptide. members, which included five clergy, although none was a serving Anglican priest. It was not for the fact that the BNP wants to bring back corporal punishment corporal punishment, physical chastisement of an offender. At one extreme it includes the death penalty (see capital punishment), but the term usually refers to punishments like flogging, mutilation, and branding. Until c. for petty criminals, and capital punishment for paedophiles and terrorists. Nor was it for encouraging the descendants of post-war immigrants from Asia and the Caribbean to "move back where they came from". The proposer of the motion, who works for the Metropolitan Police, said it was necessary to prevent the BNP from associating itself with the Church. That's not a good enough reason. The BNP, whether or not you hold its views to be obnoxious, is a legitimate political party. Banning clergy from this party prevents the church from addressing the more fundamental question which is, what train of thought has the individual followed that makes them believe their faith is morally aligned to what the BNP believes and how can they be set straight? Try persuasion, try ridicule but don't stop the discussion by banning people from a political party that society as a whole is prepared to tolerate within the law, however grudgingly. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion