Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Crime Scene Investigation Understanding the CSI Effect


If you are a fan of CSI, be it the Gil Grissom original or the various spin-off shows, it's probably better if you don't get called up for jury service. Programs such as Forensic files, Law and Order, CSI, CSI Miami etc may be hugely popular and thoroughly entertaining but they have created what is know in academic and professional circles as the 'CSI effect'

According to Max Houck, director of the Forensic Science Initiative, a program that develops research and professional training for forensic scientists, "The CSI effect is basically the perception of the near-infallibility of forensic science in response to the TV show,"

The main distortion between fictional portrayals and the application of forensic science in the real world is 'time frame'. It can take several weeks, sometimes months to get results back from the lab, however, in the fictional world of forensic science and crime scene investigation, results invariabaly come back straight away.

It would seem that the CSI effect is most visible in the court room, particularly among jurors. Max Houck mentioned above, argues that Prosecutors fear the CSI effect among juries because they may question why everything is not subject to forensic analysis, when in fact not everything has to be. Equally, Defence attorneys are concerned about the CSI effect because jurors may perceive the science of forensics as completely objective and totally accurate, thus ignoring the possibility of human or technical error.

Writing for USA today Richard Willing outlined a number of examples that highlighted the CSI effect in action. These included:

A murder trial where jurors alerted the judge that a bloody coat introduced as evidence had not been tested for DNA. In fact, the tests were not needed because the defendant acknowledged being at the murder scene. The judge stated that TV had taught jurors about DNA tests, but not enough about when to use them.

A murder trial where jurors asked the judge if a cigarette butt found during the crime scene investigation could be tested to see if it could be linked to the defendant. The defence team had ordered the tests but had not introduced them into evidence. Upon doing so, the tests exonerated the defendant, and he was acquitted.

The fact that prosecutors are now being allowed to question potential jurors about their TV-watching habits.

To find out more about the CSI effect and to test your own crime scene investigation skills and knowledge visit

http://www.all-about-forensic-science.com/

Since 2000, David Webb has been involved in collaborative research with teams of forensic scientists in the UK, US and Canada. He has produced two websites based on his teaching and research experience. http://www.all-about-forensic-science.com
http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com

Copyright (c) 2007 Free Online Library
This article can be reproduced subject to these terms. Syndicate this article. More free articles for syndication

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:David Webb
Publication:News, opinion and commentary community
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 13, 2007
Words:493
Previous Article:Going Beyond the Mo Criminal Profiling, Jack the Ripper and Signature Behavior
Next Article:Fidel Castro Ruz - Life, Legacy and Facts



Related Articles
Low Cost Airline News.
Airline Finance News - Europe.
Airline Finance News - Europe.
What the Font? ? Understanding Typefaces on the Web
What Does It Take to Be A True Leader?
Depression - Antidepressants
Antidepressant Side Effects
The Danger in Seeking Health Advice at Health Food Stores
Ragging Thoughts
Benefits of Having Your Dog Training for Law Enforcement

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles