Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,474,578 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Credit Cards: Use and Consumer Attitudes, 1970-2000.


A notable change in consumer financial services over the past few decades has been the growth of the use of credit cards, both for payments and as sources of revolving credit. From modest origins in the 1950s as a convenient way for the relatively well-to-do to settle restaurant and department store purchases without carrying cash, credit cards have become a ubiquitous financial product held by households in all economic strata.

In modern commerce, credit cards (along with debit cards) serve as a payment device in lieu of cash or checks for millions of routine purchases as well as for many transactions that would otherwise be inconvenient, or perhaps impossible (for example, making retail purchases by telephone or over the Internet). Credit cards have also become the primary source of unsecured open-end revolving credit, and they have largely replaced the installment-purchase plans that were important to the sales volume at many retail stores in earlier decades.

Along with most major societal changes come questions about whether the trend is beneficial or detrimental (or somewhere in between), and the rise of plastic cards for payments and open-end credit is no exception. Credit cards certainly are widely used and accepted by the public. But they have also raised concerns in two areas: (1) whether consumers fully understand the costs and implications of using credit cards (the consumer information-consumer understanding concern) and (2) whether credit cards have encouraged widespread overindebtedness, particularly among those least able to pay (the indebtedness-financial distress concern). The two issues are related, because one result of lack of understanding may be overindebtedness. Both issues remain prominent in public discourse, as debt and personal bankruptcy levels have increased over the decades and media reports of confused consumers have multiplied.

Although one can usually find anecdotes to illustrate a point--consumers who are unaware of the costs of credit cards, for instance, or consumers who overspend because of the wide availability of credit--such examples can never lead to a definitive understanding of issues having broad social or economic impact. Statistically representative surveys can contribute to a more complete understanding of consumers' experiences. Taken together, such surveys can serve as a status report on the use of credit cards some fifty years after their introduction. This article brings to the discussion some survey evidence on the use of credit cards in the United States. It begins with an examination of long-term trends in consumer indebtedness, with attention to the growth of card-based credit. It then moves to an exploration of the consumer information-consumer understanding issue, with emphasis on consumers' attitudes toward credit cards and their knowledge of costs.

CREDIT CARDS AND INDEBTEDNESS

The Federal Reserve Board collects data on amounts of consumer credit outstanding, including amounts of revolving consumer credit, most of which is generated by credit cards.(1) Total (nonmortgage) consumer credit outstanding increased from $119 billion at year-end 1968 to $1,456 billion in June 2000 (in current dollars, not seasonally adjusted), while the revolving component grew from $2 billion to about $626 billion over the same period. Because population, income, employment, prices, and nearly every other economic indicator also rose over the period, the growth of consumer credit is often put in perspective by comparing it with the growth of consumers' income.

Total (nonmortgage) consumer credit outstanding (revolving and nonrevolving forms combined) has grown at approximately the same pace as disposable personal income over the past generation, although with noticeably more cyclicality. Since the mid-1960s, total consumer credit outstanding relative to this measure of income has fluctuated in a relatively narrow range of about 16 percent to 17 percent during or following recession periods to about 18 percent to 21 percent near business-cycle high-points (chart 1).

[Graph omitted]

The revolving component of consumer credit has increased relative to income over the most recent three decades, and the nonrevolving component has decreased relative to income. Thus, the revolving component's share has been growing relative to the nonrevolving component's share, reflecting consumer preference and technological change; many consumers seem to like the convenience associated with prearranged lines of credit, and technological developments have made it much easier for creditors to offer this data-intensive product. A substantial portion of the new revolving credit probably has merely replaced credit generated by the installment-purchase plans that were common at appliance, furniture, and other durable goods stores in the past. And some of the new credit is in the form of "convenience credit" on credit cards--amounts that will be paid in full upon receipt of the monthly statement. (Installment-purchase plans have no equivalent "convenience" component.)

Card Holding among Families

Dollar amounts of credit card credit outstanding can be estimated from information provided by creditors, but only surveys of consumers can provide information about the users and uses of credit cards. For this reason, each Survey of Consumer Finances since 1970 has included questions on the holding and use of credit cards (the 1967 and 1968 surveys also included a few questions about credit cards).(2)

These surveys show that in 1998 almost three-fourths of American families had one or more credit cards, up from about one-half of a smaller population in 1970 (table 1). Among credit cards, the general-purpose cards that have a revolving feature, referred to in this article as "bank-type" credit cards, show the most notable increase over the period.(3) In the early 1970s, limited-use cards issued by retail firms, usable only in the firm's stores, were the most commonly held type of credit card; bank-type cards were much less common. By 1995, however, the holding of bank-type cards was more common than the holding of retail store cards.
1. Prevalence of credit cards among U.S. families, selected years,
1970-98

Percent

         Item                                         1970   1977   1983

Have a card
Any card(1)                                            51     63     65
Retail store card                                   45(2)     54     58
Bank-type card(3)                                      16     38     43

Have a card with a balance after the most
    recent payment
Any card(1)                                            22     34     37
Retail store card                                      15     25     29
Bank-type card(3)                                       6     16     22

MEMO
Families having any card with an outstanding
    balance after the most recent payment as a
    proportion of all families having cards            44     56     57
Families having a bank-type card with an
    outstanding balance after the most recent
    payment as a proportion of all families
    having bank-type cards                             37     44     51
Proportion of families having a bank-type card
    who hardly ever pay revolving card balances
    in full                                           ...     18     25

         Item                                         1989   1995   1998

Have a card
Any card(1)                                            70     74     73
Retail store card                                      61     58     50
Bank-type card(3)                                      56     66     68

Have a card with a balance after the most
    recent payment
Any card(1)                                            40     44     42
Retail store card                                      28     24     19
Bank-type card(3)                                      29     37     37

MEMO
Families having any card with an outstanding
    balance after the most recent payment as a
    proportion of all families having cards            57     59     58
Families having a bank-type card with an
    outstanding balance after the most recent
    payment as a proportion of all families
    having bank-type cards                             52     56     55
Proportion of families having a bank-type card
    who hardly ever pay revolving card balances
    in full                                           26     28     27

NOTE. In 1970, families were asked about using credit cards in all other
years, they were asked about having cards.

(1.) Includes cards issued by banks, gasoline companies, retail stores
and chains, travel and entertainment card companies (for example,
American Express and Diners Clubs), and miscellaneous issuers
(for example, car rental and airline companies).

(2.) Data are for 1971.

(3.) A bank-type card is a general-purpose credit card with a
revolving feature; includes BankAmericard, Choice, Discover, MasterCard,
Master Charge, Optima, and Visa, depending on year.

... Not available.

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumer Finances.


The holding of bank-type credit cards has continued to grow in recent years, whereas the holding of retail store cards peaked about a decade ago and has fallen off since then. In fact, bank-type cards issued under the Visa and MasterCard brands are so widely held and used today that it is difficult to imagine that they were not especially common only three decades ago. Known at that time as BankAmericard and Master Charge, respectively, and issued only by commercial banking organizations, they were a new product in the mid-1960s and by 1970 together had reached only about one-sixth of families; the other major bank-type cards widely available today, Discover and Optima, were not even on the drawing boards at that time. By 1998, bank-type cards (including Discover and Optima) were in the hands of about two-thirds of families. In three decades, the general-purpose card with a revolving feature has become the most widely held credit device.

Consumers use credit cards for two main purposes: as a substitute for cash and checks when making purchases and as a source of revolving credit. In 1970, just over one-fifth of all families owed a balance on a credit card after making their most recent card payment (table 1). By 1998, the fraction was just over two-fifths. Most of the increase was due to the growing popularity of bank-type cards as devices for generating revolving credit. In 1970, only 6 percent of families had a bank-type card with an outstanding balance after their most recent payment. The proportion rose steadily until 1995 and then leveled off at 37 percent. In contrast, the proportion of families reporting an outstanding balance on a retail store card peaked in 1983 at 29 percent, and in 1998, at 19 percent, it was only a bit higher than the 15 percent recorded in 1970. Of those families that had bank-type cards, 37 percent had revolved a balance in the month before the 1970 survey, compared with 55 percent in the month before the 1998 survey. In 1977, 18 percent of holders of bank-type cards reported that they hardly ever paid their revolving accounts in full, a proportion that rose to 25 percent in 1983 and has remained at about that level since then.

Distribution of Bank-Type Credit Cards

Data from the Surveys of Consumer Finances indicate that the holding of general-purpose credit cards with a revolving feature has become more widespread among households at all income levels. For families in the lowest income group, 2 percent had a bank-type credit card in 1970, compared with 28 percent in 1998 (table 2). For those in the highest income group, the holding of bank-type cards almost tripled between 1970 and 1995--from 33 percent to 95 percent.
2. Prevalence of bank-type credit cards and outstanding balance
amounts, by family income quintiles, selected years, 1970-98

Percent except as noted

         Income quintile             1970    1977    1983

Lowest
Have a card                             2      11      11
Carrying a balance                     27      40      40
Mean balance (dollars)                896     731   1,147
Median balance (dollars)              336     538     818
Share of total revolving balance        2       4       4

Second lowest
Have a card                             9      22      27
Carrying a balance                     39      42      49
Mean balance (dollars)                659   1,055     906
Median balance (dollars)              504     565     655
Share of total revolving balance        9      13       8

Middle
Have a card                            14      36      41
Carrying a balance                     47      45      58
Mean balance (dollars)                820     883   1,161
Median balance (dollars)              630     672     736
Share of total revolving balance       22      19      19

Second highest
Have a card                            22      51      57
Carrying a balance                     39      52      56
Mean balance (dollars)              1,010     846   1,259
Median balance (dollars)              840     753     818
Share of total revolving balance       37      30      28

Highest
Have a card                            33      69      79
Carrying a balance                     30      39      47
Mean balance (dollars)                761     898   1,531
Median balance (dollars)              630     672     916
Share of total revolving balance       30      33      40

All families
Have a card                            16      38      43
Carrying a balance                     37      44      51
Mean balance (dollars)                839     889   1,282
Median balance (dollars)              630     672     818
Share of total revolving balance      100     100     100

         Income quintile             1989    1995    1998

Lowest
Have a card                            17      28      28
Carrying a balance                     43      57      59
Mean balance (dollars)                784   2,386   2,240
Median balance (dollars)              592     995     700
Share of total revolving balance        2       6       5

Second lowest
Have a card                            36      54      58
Carrying a balance                     46      57      58
Mean balance (dollars)              1,712   2,622   3,028
Median balance (dollars)            1,315   1,605   1,400
Share of total revolving balance        8      14      13

Middle
Have a card                            62      71      72
Carrying a balance                     56      58      58
Mean balance (dollars)              2,159   2,952   4,129
Median balance (dollars)            1,262   1,605   1,900
Share of total revolving balance       21      21      23

Second highest
Have a card                            76      83      86
Carrying a balance                     62      60      60
Mean balance (dollars)              2,212   2,687   4,334
Median balance (dollars)            1,183   1,605   2,000
Share of total revolving balance       30      23      29

Highest
Have a card                            89      95      95
Carrying a balance                     46      50      45
Mean balance (dollars)              3,417   4,460   5,232
Median balance (dollars)            2,630   2,246   2,500
Share of total revolving balance       40      36      29

All families
Have a card                            56      66      68
Carrying a balance                     52      56      55
Mean balance (dollars)              2,404   3,160   4,073
Median balance (dollars)            1,315   1,605   1,900
Share of total revolving balance      100     100     100

NOTE. In 1970, families were asked about using cards; in all other
years, they were asked about having cards. Proportions that "have
a Card" are percentages of families; proportions "carrying a balance"
are percentages of holders of bank-type cards with an outstanding
balance after the most recent payment. Mean and median balances are
for cardholders with outstanding balances after the most recent
payment and are in 1998 dollars, adjusted using the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers, all items. Shares may not sum to 100
percent because of rounding.

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumer Finances.


For each income group, the percentage of cardholders carrying a balance on bank-type cards also increased over the three decades, as did the mean and median revolving credit balances
Credit balance
The surplus in a cash account with a broker after purchases have been paid for, plus the extra cash from the sale of securities.
 (in constant dollars). Despite some shifts within the period, the shares of total revolving balances on these cards accounted for by each income group has not changed dramatically over the decades, perhaps contrary to popular impressions. For example, despite a sharp increase in card holding by the lowest income group, the group's share of total revolving debt on bank-type cards rose only to 5 percent in 1998, up from 2 percent in 1970 but still not a large proportion of the total. The highest income group accounted for 30 percent of revolving debt on bank-type cards in 1970, a share that over the three decades fell off only a bit, to 29 percent in 1998.

The expanded availability of card-based credit, especially to lower-income consumers, has raised concerns that issuers have taken on more credit risk and that instances of financial distress may increase sharply at some point. Data on the proportion of dollars of revolving credit delinquent thirty days or more, available from Call Reports submitted by commercial banks since 1991, indicate an upward trend from 1994 to 1996 and a leveling after that (chart 2). This pattern is similar to that for delinquencies on closed-end (nonrevolving) consumer credit extended by banks, much of which is secured credit associated with the purchase of automobiles. Data on the proportion of consumers (rather than dollars) delinquent, assembled by the Credit Research Center (Georgetown University) from a random sample of consumer credit reports maintained by a national credit reporting agency, show that at year-end 1999, 3.4 percent of consumers were thirty days delinquent on at least one bank-type card account (not shown in chart). This source also shows that more serious delinquency (overdue ninety days or more) has remained at or slightly below 1 percent of holders of active bank-type card accounts over the past decade.(4)

[Graph omitted]

CONSUMER INFORMATION AND CONSUMER UNDERSTANDING

Beginning with the Truth in Lending Act (enacted in 1968 as Title I of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, effective July 1, 1969), much federal legislation regulating consumer credit has concerned either mandatory fairness procedures (the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, for example) or mandatory disclosures (the Truth in Lending Act, for example). The disclosure requirements have in large part been intended to help prevent or mitigate overextension and other difficulties resulting from a lack of understanding of credit terms
Credit Terms
The conditions under which credit will be extended to a customer. The components of credit terms are: cash discount, credit period, net period.
 and the consequences of using credit. General-purpose household surveys can help in assessing the effects of these laws. Unfortunately, the specifics of many individual consumer's credit-related difficulties do not lend themselves to such broad-based surveys. Surveying currently delinquent debtors, for example, is difficult with a broad survey because delinquency is relatively rare; large numbers of interviews must be completed to yield enough cases to analyze an uncommon phenomenon with precision. General-purpose surveys can, however, characterize consumers' overall impressions of their card-using experiences and their views on conditions in the marketplace, including the availability of information.

Consumers' Attitudes toward Credit Cards

To explore consumers' attitudes toward and understanding of credit cards, as well as to gather information about card use, the Credit Research Center in January 2000 sponsored interviews of nearly 500 households representative of households in the forty-eight contiguous states. Interviewing was done by the Survey Research Center of the University of Michigan as part of its monthly Surveys of Consumers.

General Attitudes

Respondents--both those who used credit cards and those who did not--were first asked their broad feelings about credit cards. So that attitude changes could be tracked over time, the question was identical to the question asked in nationwide Surveys of Consumer Finances in 1970 and again in 1977: "People have different opinions about credit cards. Overall, would you say that using credit cards is a good thing or a bad thing?"

Overall opinions about credit cards are somewhat more negative and polarized in 2000 than they were a generation ago, especially among holders of bank-type cards (table 3). Opinions among all families that credit card use is "good" register a bit higher in 2000 (33 percent) than in 1970 (28 percent) but a bit lower than in 1977 (39 percent). The view that card use is "bad" is stronger in 2000 than in either of the earlier years.
3. Opinions about the use of credit cards, selected years

Percent
                                        1970

         Opinion                              Bank-type
                            All families     card users

Good                              28              45

Good, with qualification          13              17

Both good and bad                 12              14

Bad, with qualification            4               4

Bad                               43              20

Total                            100             100

                                        1977

         Opinion                              Bank-type
                            All families    card holders

Good                             39              54

Good, with qualification         19              20

Both good and bad                11               8

Bad, with qualification           4               3

Bad                              27              14

Total                           100             100

                                        2000

         Opinion                              Bank-type
                            All families    card holders

Good                             33              42

Good, with qualification         10               9

Both good and bad                 6               5

Bad, with qualification           1               1

Bad                              51              42

Total                           100             100

NOTE. Components may not sum to 100 because of rounding.

SOURCE. For 1970 and 1977, Surveys of Consumer Finances; for 2000,
Surveys of Consumers.


In all three surveys, views among holders of bank-type cards were more favorable than those among the population generally. Nonetheless, unfavorable views among cardholders have increased over the decades; negative attitudes among cardholders are much more common in 2000 (42 percent) than they were in 1977 (14 percent). This finding is interesting because card use is also much greater in 2000. In 2000, holders of bank-type cards are about equally divided in their opinions that credit card use is good or bad, much different from 1977, when a considerably larger proportion had a favorable opinion.(5)

Consumers' opinions about credit cards also vary depending on their use of and experience with cards. Less enthusiastic viewpoints are somewhat more common among those who use credit cards as credit devices rather than primarily as substitutes for cash or checks. Specifically, cards are viewed less positively by those who have three or more cards, have an outstanding balance of more than $1,500, have transferred a balance between cards, hardly ever pay their outstanding balance in full, hardly ever pay more than the monthly minimum, or have received a collection call.
Prevalence of negative attitudes toward using credit cards
among holders of bank-type credit cards, 2000

                                                      Percent believing
                  Cardholder group                    that using credit
                                                         cards is bad

All holders of bank-type cards                                42

Have a new card account in the past year                      47
Have three or more cards                                      49
Have an outstanding balance greater than $1,500
  after the most recent payment                               57
Have transferred a balance to another account
  in the past year(1)                                         60

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full                   59
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum(1)                      63
Have paid a late fee in the past year                         47
Have received a collection call in the past year(1)           62

Family's annual income is $40,000 to $74,999                  49
Respondent has high school diploma or some college,
  but not a degree                                            46
Respondent is 35 to 54 years old                              48

1. Weighted sample size less than fifty.

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumers.


Conversely, those who have fewer cards, have no balance or a low balance outstanding, generally pay more than the minimum, or have not received a collection call have more favorable views (not shown in the table). Demographic measures also appear to be related to attitudes toward credit cards, but the relationship is not as strong as that associated with the variables related to the use of cards.

Attitudes toward Card Features, Card Issuers, and Other Users

To examine why card users might have the general attitudes about credit cards that they do, the 2000 survey also asked questions about specific features of credit cards and about card issuers and users. The questions took the form of statements with which respondents could agree or disagree. Although data from earlier years are not available for comparison, responses to these questions reveal an interesting divergence of views that might help explain why overall attitudes have deteriorated. The responses suggest that the current negativity may have arisen in part from an individual's perceptions of other consumers' difficulties rather than from the individual's own experiences. Without data from earlier periods and questions designed specifically to address this hypothesis, one cannot be certain, but from the 2000 survey results it seems likely that as card use has become more common, negative opinions about card use may have increased as a result of perceptions about "the other guy." Views about personal experiences with credit cards, in contrast, are much more positive.

Consumers in 2000 seem to be concerned about specific practices of credit card issuers. Most holders of bank-type credit cards (more than 80 percent) believe that the annual percentage rates charged on outstanding balances are too high (table 4). They also express concern over privacy practices. In contrast, relatively few express concern about billing accuracy.
4. Attitudes of holders of bank-type credit cards toward credit cards
and card issuers, 2000

Percent

                   Attitude                      Strongly     Agree
                                                   agree    somewhat

Specific practices of card issuers
The interest rates charged on credit
    cards are reasonable                             3         16
Credit card companies show enough concern
    for protecting consumers' privacy               17         30
Credit card billing statements are accurate         54         39

Card issuers and consumers in general
Credit card companies make too much credit
    available to most people                        68         20
Sending solicitations that offer low rates
    but only for a short time probably
    misleads a lot of people                        79         14
Credit card companies make it hard for
    people to get out of debt                       55         27
Credit card companies should not be allowed
    to issue credit cards to college students       30         25
Overspending is the fault of consumers, not
    the credit card companies                       63         27

Card issuers and me
I am generally satisfied in my dealings with
    my credit card companies                        51         40
My credit card companies treat me fairly            54         36
It is easy to get a credit card from another
    company if I am not treated well                63         23
I trust that my credit card companies will
    keep my personal spending information
    confidential                                    31         38

General satisfaction or dissatisfaction
Credit card companies provide a useful
    service to consumers                            44         48
Most people are satisfied in their dealings
    with credit card companies                      15         54
Consumers would be better off if there were
    no credit cards                                 15         26

Information availability
Information on the statement about how long
    it would take to pay off the balance if
    I make only the minimum payment would
    be very helpful to me                           65         24
Mailings and other ads that offer a low
    rate at first followed by a higher rate
    are confusing to me                             36         25

MEMO: General satisfaction or
    dissatisfaction with closed-end
    creditors and lenders in 1977
They provide a useful service to consumers          42         51
Most people are satisfied in their dealings
    with them                                       17         60
It would be a good thing for consumers
    if they were not around                          6         21

                   Attitude                      Disagree   Strongly
                                                 somewhat   disagree

Specific practices of card issuers
The interest rates charged on credit
    cards are reasonable                            26         55
Credit card companies show enough concern
    for protecting consumers' privacy               21         31
Credit card billing statements are accurate          5          2

Card issuers and consumers in general
Credit card companies make too much credit
    available to most people                         9          4
Sending solicitations that offer low rates
    but only for a short time probably
    misleads a lot of people                         4          3
Credit card companies make it hard for
    people to get out of debt                       10          9
Credit card companies should not be allowed
    to issue credit cards to college students       23         22
Overspending is the fault of consumers, not
    the credit card companies                        6          4

Card issuers and me
I am generally satisfied in my dealings with
    my credit card companies                         6          4
My credit card companies treat me fairly             6          4
It is easy to get a credit card from another
    company if I am not treated well                10          4
I trust that my credit card companies will
    keep my personal spending information
    confidential                                    16         15

General satisfaction or dissatisfaction
Credit card companies provide a useful
    service to consumers                             6          2
Most people are satisfied in their dealings
    with credit card companies                      20         11
Consumers would be better off if there were
    no credit cards                                 30         29

Information availability
Information on the statement about how long
    it would take to pay off the balance if
    I make only the minimum payment would
    be very helpful to me                            7          4
Mailings and other ads that offer a low
    rate at first followed by a higher rate
    are confusing to me                             15         24

MEMO: General satisfaction or
    dissatisfaction with closed-end
    creditors and lenders in 1977
They provide a useful service to consumers           6          1
Most people are satisfied in their dealings
    with them                                       18          5
It would be a good thing for consumers
    if they were not around                         36         38

NOTE: Components may not sum to 100 because of rounding.

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumers; memo items, 1977 Survey of Consumer
Finances.


Consumers' feelings about experiences with credit cards in general are even more negative than their feelings about specific practices.(6) Holders of bank-type credit cards in 2000 believe that too much credit is available, that consumers are confused about some practices, and that credit users have difficulty getting out of debt. Somewhat over half said that issuers should not be allowed to market cards to college students. Moreover, they appear to believe that consumers bring on themselves many of the problems associated with credit cards: Ninety percent agree to some extent that overspending is the fault of consumers, not of card issuers.

Survey evidence does not suggest that increasingly negative views of credit cards have arisen from adverse personal experiences. Rather, consumers' opinions about their own relations with their current card issuers are much more favorable than their opinions about the relations of consumers in general. Approximately nine in ten holders of bank-type credit cards said that they are satisfied with their dealings with card companies, that their card companies treat them fairly, and that it is easy to get another card if they are not treated fairly. Almost seven in ten trust that their own card companies would keep their personal information confidential, substantially more than the proportion believing that card companies in general show enough concern about protecting privacy (just under five in ten). Cardholders' opinions about their own experiences are almost the reverse of their views about consumers' experiences in general, suggesting considerable concern over the behavior of others and possibly a belief that "I can handle credit cards, but other people cannot."

Despite expressed concerns about some practices and experiences, consumers appear to be satisfied with the credit card market in general. Approximately nine in ten holders of bank-type credit cards said that credit cards provide a useful service to consumers, and about seven in ten said that most people are satisfied in their dealings with card companies. About six in ten disagreed that consumers would be better off without cards. These results are similar to those from a 1977 survey of users of nonrevolving credit (memo items in table 4). It seems that credit and creditors are not viewed completely favorably, even by users of the service, but that most users are favorably inclined.

Many holders of bank-type cards in 2000 said that it would be helpful to include on their billing statement information about the length of time it would take to pay off the balance if only the minimum payment were made each month. Exactness in such a calculation assumes, of course, that the consumer does not use the card during the repayment period and that the balance declines on schedule. If the balance were to fluctuate substantially, the calculation would be difficult or impossible, and most likely meaningless (discussed further later). Survey respondents probably did not consider the implications and complexity of the calculations but were simply acknowledging a desire for a practical measure of the burden they are incurring. Many respondents also reported that "teaser rates" are confusing. They could, of course, avoid teaser rates altogether by ignoring the mailings that promote them; consequently, this survey finding may reflect concerns among consumers that card issuers have complicated promotions sufficiently that it is difficult to understand and accept advantageous offers when they are made.

What emerges from these responses to opinion questioning, in sum, is a multifaceted set of attitudes about credit cards. Multifaceted opinions are not especially surprising, given that consumers overall seem to think that credit cards are both good and bad. They believe that finance percentage rates on outstanding balances are too high, are suspicious of how personal information is used, and have relatively little confidence in other individuals who use credit cards. When they imagine "the other guy" in contact with card issuers, whose behavior is already suspect, they imagine possibly negative consequences, for example, excessive credit use. When the focus shifts to more-personal experience, however, they view the outcome much more favorably, suggesting that actual problems with credit cards are not nearly as widespread as consumers imagine them to be when they think about the population of largely unknown "others." On balance, holders of bank-type credit cards in 2000 believe that credit cards are useful and that consumers are better off with them than without them--despite concerns over the inability of "other (unknown) consumers" to exercise self-discipline and avoid overuse; these opinions seem to mirror earlier views about installment credit. Finally, consumers believe that additional, and less-confusing, information about payments and rates would be useful.

Information about Credit Terms

In addition to attitudes, the January 2000 Survey of Consumers specifically looked at consumers' knowledge of credit terms and their views concerning the availability of information about terms.

Assessing consumers' knowledge of credit terms and their use of that knowledge is not a straightforward matter. One question is which term or terms to focus on. A second question is how, in an interview survey, to determine the accuracy of the consumer's knowledge. Since implementation of the Truth in Lending Act, the annual percentage rate (APR) has been considered the most important term concerning the price of credit to be disclosed by creditors, and consequently it has been the credit term studied most extensively. It is reasonable to assume that credit users must be aware of annual percentage rates if disclosure of this pricing information is to affect their behavior. An awareness of APRs does not necessarily mean that consumers will change their behavior, but behavioral change resulting from disclosure of APRs is highly unlikely if credit users are not aware of those rates.(7)

Because in interview surveys the annual percentage rates reported by respondents typically cannot be checked against the rates respondents actually pay, researchers associated with the National Commission on Consumer Finance in the 1970s devised the concept of "awareness zones" to measure knowledge of APRs.(8) If a respondent reports an APR within a range deemed, on the basis of a survey of current market practices, to be reasonable, the respondent is characterized as "aware"; if the respondent reports an APR outside the range or answers "do not know," the individual is characterized as "unaware." Although this is an inexact means of measuring awareness of APRs on actual credit card accounts, it does make possible a broad look at the phenomenon as well as comparisons over time.

"Awareness" of APRs on bank-type credit cards, as measured by the awareness-zones method, has increased sharply since implementation of the Truth in Lending Act in 1969 (table 5). In that year, only 27 percent of holders of bank-type credit cards interviewed in a Federal Reserve survey were classified as aware. Awareness more than doubled a year after implementation of the act and has continued to rise since then.
5. Awareness of annual percentage rates among holders of bank-type
credit cards, selected years

Percent aware

              Cardholder group                  1969   1970   1977

All holders of bank-type cards                   27     63     71

Have a new card account in the past year        ...    ...    ...
Have three or more cards                        ...    ...    ...
Have an outstanding balance greater than
  $1,500 after the most recent payment          ...    ...    ...
Have transferred a balance to another account
  in the past year(1)                           ...    ...    ...

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full     ...    ...    ...
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum(1)        ...    ...    ...
Have paid a late fee in the past year           ...    ...    ...
Have received a collection call in the
  past year(1)                                  ...    ...    ...

Family's annual income is $40,000 to $74,999    ...    ...    ...
Respondent has high school diploma or some
  college, but not a degree                     ...    ...    ...
Respondent is 35 to 54 years old                ...    ...    ...

                                                          2000

              Cardholder group

                                                  Narrow       Broad
                                                definition   definition

All holders of bank-type cards                      85           91

Have a new card account in the past year            83           93
Have three or more cards                            89           95
Have an outstanding balance greater than
  $1,500 after the most recent payment              90           96
Have transferred a balance to another account
  in the past year(1)                               81           98

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full         90           96
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum(1)            82           88
Have paid a late fee in the past year               88           95
Have received a collection call in the
  past year(1)                                      80           81

Family's annual income is $40,000 to $74,999        90           94
Respondent has high school diploma or some
  college, but not a degree                         86           91
Respondent is 35 to 54 years old                    87           92

NOTE. See text for definitions of "awareness."

(1.) Weighted sample size less than fifty.

... Not available.

SOURCE. For 1969 and 1970, Federal Reserve Truth in Lending Surveys;
for 1977, Survey of Consumer Finances; for 2000, Surveys of Consumers.


In 1969, 1970, and 1977, consumers were considered aware if they reported a rate greater than 12 percent per year or within the range of 1 percent to 2 percent per month on the card they used most often. For the 2000 survey, the definition of "aware" was changed because rates on credit card balances in many cases are below 12 percent per year--and so-called teaser rates are even lower. Because a very low rate could not be automatically ruled out as the correct current rate, two definitions of awareness were used in 2000. Under the broad definition, only those reporting that they did not know the rate were considered "unaware." Under the narrow definition, those reporting a rate of less than 7.9 percent were also considered unaware. (Using 7.9 percent as the cutoff point may have resulted in an overestimation of unawareness, as some consumers may have actually had a current, "teaser," rate below 7.9 percent: Almost every answer lower than 7.9 percent offered by a respondent ended in .9--for example, 3.9 or 6.9--a sign of a teaser rate. However, this inexactitude on the lower side does not change conclusions very much.) The definition of the upper bound for the 2000 survey is of little practical importance, as only one respondent answered with a rate higher than 25 percent (with a response of 28 percent, this individual was counted as aware).

Under the broad definition of awareness, 91 percent of holders of bank-type credit cards in 2000 are aware of the APR charged on the outstanding balance on the bank-type card they use most often; under the narrow definition 85 percent are aware. Regardless of the definition used in 2000, it is clear that awareness of rates charged on outstanding balances, as measured by the awareness-zones method, has risen sharply since implementation of the Truth in Lending Act.

As with attitudes, awareness of rates varies by behavioral and demographic group. However, awareness exceeds 80 percent for all groups by both the broad and narrow definitions. Groups tending to be less aware (based on the broad definition) include the relatively small group of cardholders who had received a collection call in the past year (81 percent were aware) and those who hardly ever pay more than the minimum amount on their account (88 percent). The group of cardholders who had transferred a balance to another account within the past year registered the highest awareness rate (98 percent), consistent with the belief that balance transfers are more likely among rate-sensitive consumers (and also with the belief that rates on newly transferred accounts are easy to remember).(9) Other groups having relatively high awareness rates include those actually paying the rates, notably, consumers with an outstanding balance of more than $1,500 and those who reported that they hardly ever pay their outstanding balance in full (for both groups, 96 percent). High awareness among these groups is not especially surprising, as consumers who use the credit feature of credit cards, as opposed to just the payment feature, have a clear interest in knowing the cost of the additional service.

Potentially as important as actual awareness is the perception of ease of obtaining information about credit terms. About two-thirds of consumers in the 2000 survey who had bank-type credit cards said that obtaining information on credit terms is easy (table 6). The proportion did not vary greatly or consistently with the way the respondents used credit. Those who had an outstanding balance of more than $1,500 or had transferred a balance from one card to another in the past year were somewhat less likely to report ease in obtaining information, as were those who had received a collection call. Conversely, those who had three or more cards, hardly ever paid more than the minimum amount, or had income in the middle range were slightly more likely to report ease in obtaining information.
6. Opinions about the availability of information about credit cards
among holders of bank-type credit cards, 2000

Percent aware

                                               Information about credit
                                                        terms

Cardholder group                              Very/somewhat     Very
                                                  easy        difficult
                                                to obtain     to obtain

MEMO: All families                                 67             8

All holders of bank-type cards                     65             7

Have a new card account in the past year           63             8
Have three or more cards                           69             4
Have an outstanding balance greater than
  $1,500 after the most recent payment             60             5
Have transferred a balance to another
  account in the past year(1)                      58            14

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full        65             7
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum(1)           69            11
Have paid a late fee in the past year              62            12
Have received a collection call in the
  past year(1)                                     57            12

Family's annual income is $40,000
  to $74,999                                       68             4
Respondent has high school diploma or some
  college, but not a degree                        67             3
Respondent is 35 to 54 years old                   63             8

                                              Information needed
                                              for wise card use

Cardholder group
                                                 Card issuers
                                                provide enough

MEMO: All families                                    40

All holders of bank-type cards                        46

Have a new card account in the past year              47
Have three or more cards                              44
Have an outstanding balance greater than
  $1,500 after the most recent payment                36
Have transferred a balance to another
  account in the past year(1)                         42

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full           46
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum(1)              36
Have paid a late fee in the past year                 36
Have received a collection call in the
  past year(1)                                        28

Family's annual income is $40,000
  to $74,999                                          45
Respondent has high school diploma or some
  college, but not a degree                           46
Respondent is 35 to 54 years old                      48

(1.) Weighted sample size less than fifty.

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumers.


Only 8 percent of all families and 7 percent of holders of bank-type cards believe that obtaining information on credit terms is very difficult. These proportions also vary according to consumer experience and behavior. The proportion is highest for those who have transferred a balance in the past year, those who hardly ever pay more than the minimum due on their accounts, those who have paid a late fee in the past year, and those who have received a collection call in the past year. However, in no case does the proportion rise as high as 15 percent of cardholders.

The proportions of holders of bank-type cards reporting that obtaining information on terms is easy or difficult in 2000 is similar to the proportions in earlier surveys, although in the earlier years the focus was on credit generally rather than credit cards. The proportion of all families indicating in earlier years that obtaining information on credit terms was very easy or somewhat easy ranged from 57 percent to 68 percent, and the proportion indicating that obtaining information was very difficult never rose as high as 10 percent (table 7). The proportion saying that obtaining information was easy was, in all but one year, higher among credit users than among all families, and the proportion saying that obtaining information was very difficult was lower in every year.
7. Opinions about the ease of obtaining information about
credit terms, selected years, 1977-2000

Percent

    Group/year     Very/somewhat   Very difficult
                      easy

All families
1977                   58               9
1981                   68               7
1984                   57               8
1993-4                 63               7
1997                   59               9
2000                   67               8

Credit users(1)
1977                   63               8
1981                   78               3
1984                   62               1
1993-4                 72               5
1997                   72               3
2000                   65               7

NOTE. For 2000, ease of obtaining information about credit card terms;
for all other years, information about credit terms.

(1.) For 1977, families with (closed-end) installment debt outstanding;
for 1981, 1993-94, and 1997, families that had incurred (closed-end)
installment debt in the past year; for 1984, families that had made a
purchase on the installment plan in the past year; for 2000, holders of
bank-type credit cards.

SOURCE: For 1977, Survey of Consumer Finances; for all other years,
Surveys of Consumers.


The 2000 survey also asked whether credit card companies "usually give enough information to people to enable them to use their credit cards wisely." A bit under half (46 percent) of holders of bank-type cards answered "yes" (table 6). This frequency seemed low in light of the widespread use of credit cards, raising the question of whether the "other guy" effect discussed earlier might be exerting a negative bias. Some consumers might believe that they personally have enough information but that other consumers, who can be counted on to make mistakes when dealing with card issuers, do not. A question focused on the respondents' own experiences might have produced a higher positive response.

To explore these possibilities, two indexes of overall attitudes--one of negativity toward the "other guy" and the other of positiveness about personal experiences--were constructed from responses to statements about "card issuers and consumers in general" and "card issuers and me" (see table 4). For each of the five statements in the former category, which are framed to reflect negatively on issuers and consumers, a value of -2 was assigned to each "strongly agree" response and a value of -1 was assigned to each "agree" response; other responses were assigned a value of zero. The values were then summed for each respondent, giving an index value within a range of -10 to zero for that respondent. The respondents were then divided into two groups, "strongly negative" (an index value of -7 through -10, characterizing about 42 percent of holders of bank-type cards) and all others. A similar but positive index was constructed from the favorable responses to the statements about personal experiences ("card issuers and me" in table 4); and the respondents were similarly divided into two groups, "strongly positive" (about 49 percent of holders of bank-type cards) and all others.

Respondents who were not strongly negative about other consumers were in fact somewhat more likely to believe that card issuers give cardholders enough information to enable them to use their credit cards wisely; 52 percent of this group answered this way, compared with 46 percent of all cardholders. Of the group with a strongly positive index for personal experiences, 55 percent said issuers provide enough information (figures not in the tables). Although the differences are not dramatic, it does seem likely that the "other guy" effect exerts a downward bias on views as to whether credit card issuers provide enough information. Even with the possible downward bias, about two-fifths of all families in 2000 believe that creditors provide enough information.(10)

Holders of bank-type credit cards who said either that card issuers do not provide enough information or that they do not know were also asked a follow-up question: "What kind of information do you think would be helpful?" The wording of the question permits thinking about other consumers as well as more personally. The responses suggest a concern about the clarity of already available information (table 8), raising a question as to whether the required information provided now is so extensive and frequent that it is almost overwhelming. Those who said that more information would be helpful simultaneously seem to be saying that they do not understand the information already provided, as many of the features they said would be helpful--clear statement of interest rates and changes in rates, and a clear definition of fees for cash advances and other services, for example--are already required by disclosure regulations. Respondents indicating that credit counseling and information about overextension would be useful could be expressing concern for others as well as for themselves.
8. Proportion of holders of bank-type credit cards believing that
specific actions to provide more information would be helpful, 2000

Percent

                                    Bank-type card
                                   holders who said   All bank-type
             Action                more information   card holders
                                   would be helpful

Clearly state interest rates and
  changes in interest rates               35               19

Clearly define fees and charges           15                8

Make fine print bigger                    12                6

Offer credit counseling                   12                6

Provide more information
  about overextension                     14                8

Give information about costs
  if only the minimum amount
  is paid                                 11                6

All other responses                       14                8


Information about Payoff Times

Some observers have proposed that the Truth in Lending Act be amended to require card issuers to disclose to cardholders the period of time necessary to pay off a credit card balance if only the minimum amount is paid each month. Consumers indicate that they would like to have this information. However, precision in such a figure would imply that the consumer would not add to the balance in subsequent months (an assumption that also might be disclosed). If the consumer makes the minimum payment but continues to use the card, and the balance fluctuates substantially, the disclosure would in many cases be inaccurate. Of course, some consumers who rarely pay the balance in full might, nonetheless, benefit from an imperfect glimpse of the length of time necessary to repay in full.

To learn about consumers' behavior with respect to paying balances and the likelihood of their ceasing to use the card after paying only the minimum amount, questions on this subject sponsored by the Federal Reserve were asked in the monthly Surveys of Consumers undertaken by the Survey Research Center of the University of Michigan in the summer of 1999, and identical questions sponsored by the Credit Research Center were included in the Surveys of Consumers in January 2000. In all, 2,000 consumers were questioned. Findings that 73 percent had a credit card of some type and 69 percent had a bank-type card correspond well with results of the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances.

Just over one-third (35 percent) of holders of bank-type cards said they hardly ever pay their balance in full, somewhat higher than the 27 percent found in the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances. Nine percent of cardholders reported that they sometimes pay more than the minimum amount due, and only 7 percent said they hardly ever pay more than the minimum.
Card-related behaviors among holders of bank-type
credit cards, 1999 and 2000

            Behavior                                   Percent

Hardly ever pay outstanding balance in full              35
Sometimes pay more than the minimum                       9
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum                     7

Sometimes or hardly ever pay more than
   the minimum, and do not use the card
   if making minimum payment                              9
Hardly ever pay more than the minimum,
  and do not use the card if making
  minimum payment                                         4

SOURCE. Surveys of Consumers, June-August 1999 and January 2000.


As discussed earlier, those who would benefit most directly from information about the length of time it would take to pay off a revolving account by making only the minimum payment each month would be card users who pay the minimum and then do not make additional charges (as noted, if they continued to use the accounts, the length of time to repay would change). Survey findings indicate that 9 percent of holders of bank-type cards are in this category. If only those who say they hardly ever pay more than the minimum are considered, the proportion who report that they stop using the card falls to 4 percent of holders of bank-type cards.

CONCLUSION

The holding and use of general-purpose credit cards with a revolving feature, as well as balances outstanding, have increased substantially over the past three decades. These "bank-type" credit cards are, to some extent, a substitute for the installment-purchase plans formerly offered by retail stores. Consumers apparently like the convenience associated with card-based open-end credit lines, but they also express concerns. Some of their concerns may arise from personal experiences, but some also apparently come from perceptions of the difficulties of other consumers. Many consumers, by one measure of one important credit cost term, are aware of the costs associated with the use of revolving credit, and most consumers say that obtaining information on credit card terms is not very difficult. Responses to consumer interviews suggest that attitudes toward credit cards and card companies are similar to attitudes about closed-end credit in an earlier generation. Credit and creditors are never universally popular, it seems, even among users, and technological change in credit issuance has not altered this observation.

(1.) Consumer credit covers most short- and intermediate-term credit extended to individuals. It includes revolving credit (credit card credit and balances outstanding on unsecured revolving lines of credit) and nonrevolving credit (such as secured and unsecured credit for automobiles, mobile homes, trailers, durable goods, vacations, and other purposes). Consumer credit excludes loans secured by real estate (such as mortgage loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit).

(2.) The Survey of Consumer Finances series is sponsored by the Federal Reserve Board, sometimes jointly with other agencies. The 1977 survey in this series was titled the 1977 Consumer Credit Survey but is referred to in this article as the 1977 Survey of Consumer Finances because it is part of the same series. For a general description of results from recent surveys, see Arthur B. Kennickell, Martha Starr-McCluer, and Brian J. Surette, "Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Results from the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances," Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 86 (January 2000), pp. 1-29.

(3.) "Travel and entertainment" cards such as American Express and Diners Club are not included here as "bank-type" cards because they do not offer a revolving feature.

(4.) See Credit Research Center (McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.), Monthly Statements, various issues.

(5.) Interestingly, contrary opinions about consumer credit, even from the same person, apparently have been around much longer than these surveys. Referring to the paradox of dichotomous views as the "Victorian money-management ethic," a cultural historian recently pointed out that the simultaneous belief that credit is good but debt is bad is actually at least as old as American history. See Lendol Calder, Financing the American Dream: A Cultural History of Consumer Credit (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999).

(6.) Survey interviewers did not offer the statements in the order given in table 4; the table groups topically similar questions for analytical purposes.

(7.) For discussion of this topic, see George S. Day, "Assessing the Effects of Information Disclosure Requirements," Journal of Marketing, vol. 40 (April 1976), pp. 42-52.

(8.) See National Commission on Consumer Finance, Consumer Credit in the United States: The Report of the National Commission on Consumer Finance (Government Printing Office, 1972); Robert P. Shay and Milton P. Schober, Consumer Awareness of Annual Percentage Rates of Charge in Consumer Installment Credit: Before and After Truth in Lending Became Effective, Technical Studies of the National Commission on Consumer Finance, vol. 1, no. 1 (Government Printing Office, 1973); George S. Day and William K. Brandt, A Study of Consumer Credit Decisions: Implications for Present and Prospective Legislation, Technical Studies of the National Commission on Consumer Finance, vol. 1, no. 2 (Government Printing Office, 1973).

(9.) The large difference between the rates for the narrow and broad measures for this group and also for those with new accounts suggests that some respondents may have been reporting teaser rates and should be counted as aware under the narrow definition, as they were under the broad definition.

(10.) It is also possible to examine the association of strongly negative and positive attitudes with overall beliefs that credit cards are good or bad (the measurement in table 3). Notably, 55 percent of those in the strongly negative group (that is, those who expressed negativity on the questions about consumers) believe that credit cards are "bad" (a percentage much higher than that for the population as a whole), compared with 35 percent of those in the strongly positive group (that is, those who feel positive about their personal experiences) (much lower than the percentage for the population as a whole).

Thomas A. Durkin, of the Board's Division of Research and Statistics, prepared this article. Nicole Price provided research assistance.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Price, Nicole
Publication:Federal Reserve Bulletin
Article Type:Statistical Data Included
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2000
Words:9261
Previous Article:Guide to Statistical Releases and Special Tables.(Illustration)
Next Article:Treasury and Federal Reserve Foreign Exchange Operations.(Statistical Data Included)
Topics:



Related Articles
Developments in the pricing of credit card services.
Statement submitted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance of the Committee on...
Just how smart are smart cards?
Testimony of Federal Reserve officials.(Alan Greenspan address, Dolores S. Smith address)(Transcript)(Statistical Data Included)
Consumers and credit disclosures: credit cards and credit insurance.
The use of checks and other noncash payment instruments in the United States.(Statistical Data Included)
Modeling credit card borrowing: a comparison of type I and type II Tobit approaches.
Surveys of gas prices designed to track both trends and cents.(Up Front)
Credit scoring using data mining techniques.
Recent developments in the credit card market and the financial obligations ratio.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles