Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Creators of "Harry & Louise" Ads Fire First Shot at HMO Consumer Protections in Prop. 214; This Time, "Harry & Lou" Characters Sidestep Consumer Concerns, Inflate Potential Costs in Attempt to Sink Prop. 214.


SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 12, 1996--Opponents of Proposition 214, the HMO HMO health maintenance organization.

HMO
n.
A corporation that is financed by insurance premiums and has member physicians and professional staff who provide curative and preventive medicine within certain financial,
 Patient Rights Initiative, today launched a television ad campaign created by the makers of the "Harry and Louise "Harry and Louise" was the name of a television commercial funded by the Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), a health insurance industry lobbying group, in opposition to President Bill Clinton's proposed health care plan in 1993. " ads against national health reform in 1993.

This time around, the ads feature twin brothers, "misrepresenting two ballot measures that use very different methods to address HMO denial of care to patients," according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 Beth Capell, Prop 214 campaign manager.

"In 1993, Harry and Louise took on the Clinton health plan. This year, twin characters ("Harry and Lou") star in ads designed to defeat Prop. 214, which ensures access to health care for those who already have insurance," said Capell. "While consumers need to battle their HMO to receive the health care that has already been paid for, HMOs are spending millions of patients' premium dollars on these ads to defeat consumer protections."

"The HMO attack ads don't deal with the real issue -- denial of medical care to patients who need it and have paid for it," said Dr. Jennifer Reifel, a Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850.  oncologist Oncologist
A physician specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer

Mentioned in: Retinoblastoma

oncologist 
 and Prop. 214 supporter. "Voters need to see through these ads and ask, `Why won't the HMO industry talk about real people and real problems?' These ads may seem silly, but this issue is painfully serious and deserves a serious discussion."

Hoping that consumers and voters may fall for scare tactics For the political strategy, see Tactical politics
Scare Tactics is a reality show on the Sci-Fi Channel which began airing April 2003. It last aired on January 1, 2006. It is produced by Hallock & Healey Entertainment. In Canada, it is broadcast on Razer.
, the HMO industry contracted with Goddard-Claussen/First Tuesday -- the makers of the Harry and Louise ads. This time, the ads feature twins whose purpose it is to confuse Prop. 214 with another health care-related ballot measure. The ads are paid for by Taxpayers Against Higher Health Costs (TAHHC) -- an HMO and insurance industry organization. -0-

Prop. 214 is a measure to ensure that medical decisions are made by patients and their doctors -- not HMO bureaucrats. Prop. 214 would:

- ban written and unwritten LAW, UNWRITTEN, or lex non scripta. All the laws which do not come under the definition of written law; it is composed, principally, of the law of nature, the law of nations, the common law, and customs.  gag rules gag rules, in parliamentary procedure, rules limiting or prohibiting free debate on a particular issue. In U.S. history, the term is applied especially to procedural rules in force in the House of Representatives from 1836 to 1844. ; - prohibit HMOs from offering financial incentives to doctors for

denying needed medical care; - require a second opinion before a doctor-recommended treatment can

be denied;

Prop. 214 is the first of two health care-related initiatives on the November ballot. It does not contain new taxes, increase health care costs dramatically, or create new government agencies.

Cost figures used in the ad are from a study by the Barents Group, which was paid $40,000 to date by TAHHC, according to recent campaign finance reports.

The Barents cost estimates are based on the completely false assumption that Prop. 214 would return health care to a "fee for service" system. An analysis by James Kahn James Kahn is an American medical specialist and writer, best known for his novelization of . Born in Chicago on December 30, 1947, Kahn received a degree in medical studies from the University of Chicago. , MD, MPH at the Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California/San Francisco calls the Barents study "deeply flawed flaw 1  
n.
1. An imperfection, often concealed, that impairs soundness: a flaw in the crystal that caused it to shatter. See Synonyms at blemish.

2.
 and inconsistent with published research."

The Barents study's cost estimates are "grossly exaggerated" and contain "very substantial errors," Dr. Kahn said.

The state's legislative analyst estimates that Prop. 214's consumer protections may cost between "tens of millions and hundreds of millions of dollars" to implement -- less than one percent of California's annual $120 billion health care industry. This number is significantly less that the Barents' estimate.

"The HMO industry and Chamber of Commerce insist Prop. 214 is not `real reform,'" Capell said. "We encourage every Californian to read the voter pamphlet pamphlet, short unbound or paper-bound book of from 64 to 96 pages. The pamphlet gained popularity as an instrument of religious or political controversy, giving the author and reader full benefit of freedom of the press.  they will receive before the election. Prop. 214 is a simple, effective measure to ensure that HMOs don't deny care to patients who need it and have paid for it. Voters will decide if Prop. 214 contains real consumer protections they support." -0-

YES ON 214/HMO PATIENT RIGHTS INITIATIVE

A ballot initiative endorsed by Californians for Patient Rights, a coalition of consumers, doctors, nurses, healthcare workers, labor & seniors.

CONTACT: Californians For Patient Rights

Robin Kane, 415/546-6656

Maureen Marr, 310/659-8828
COPYRIGHT 1996 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Aug 12, 1996
Words:617
Previous Article:Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products Reports Profitability and Record Revenues for the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 1996.
Next Article:Integrated Interactive Advertising Campaign Brings Leading Manufacturers Together on Multicom's Latest Home Remodeling CD-ROM; Multicom Publishing,...
Topics:



Related Articles
Harry and Louise: the sequel.
Does managed care need to be replaced?: "Father" of managed care unveils new plan. (Managed Care).
STATE'S CONSUMERS WILL REFORM HMOS; VOTERS REJECT GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION BUT SHOP FOR PLANS FREE OF DOCTOR `GAG' ORDERS, HUGE PROFITS.
HMOS AIM TO KILL BALLOT MEASURES : PROPOSITIONS OFFER CHOICES ON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT.
PUBLIC FORUM : TAXING COMPANIES PASSES BURDEN TO CONSUMERS.
MEASURE FOR MEASURE : THE NATION ACCORDING TO STATE'S BALLOT INITIATIVES.
FIGURES FLY IN DEBATE ON PROPS, TAXES.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles