Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,573,512 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Court says financial newsletter entitled to news media privilege.


Tim Mulligan mul·li·gan  
n.
A golf shot not tallied against the score, granted in informal play after a poor shot especially from the tee.



[Probably from the name Mulligan.]

Noun 1.
, publisher of The Eyeshade Report, a newsletter that reports on publicly traded companies publicly traded company

A company whose shares of common stock are held by the public and are available for purchase by investors. The shares of publicly traded firms are bought and sold on the organized exchanges or in the over-the-counter market.
, wrote an article that was very critical of Matrixx Initiatives Inc. "I derived most of the information from Matrixx's Securities and Exchange Commission report, but there were some private sources," Mulligan said.

Matrixx alleges that the article contained false statements about their nasal nasal /na·sal/ (na´zil) pertaining to the nose.

na·sal
adj.
Of, in, or relating to the nose.



nasal

pertaining to the nose.
 products and it demanded the subscriber lists of the newsletter to identify possible sources of the article.

Mulligan said that compelling disclosure of subscriber lists creates special problems for industry-specific reporters because their subscribers and news sources may be the same people.

In January 2005 a Maryland circuit court judge refused Mulligan's request to squash the subpoena subpoena (səpē`nə) [Lat.,=under penalty], in law, an order to a witness to appear before a court. A subpoena ad testificandum [Lat. . Following his appeal, last month a panel of Maryland appellate Relating to appeals; reviews by superior courts of decisions of inferior courts or administrative agencies and other proceedings.  judges ruled that Mulligan qualifies for protection under the state's news media privilege act.

Still, the appeals court in Annapolis upheld the subpoena but noted that Mulligan would not have to answer questions covered by the media privilege.
COPYRIGHT 2006 The Newsletter on Newsletters LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Tim Mulligan v. Matrixx Initiatives Inc; false information case
Publication:The Newsletter on Newsletters
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 4, 2006
Words:163
Previous Article:Resource.(Who, what, when & where)
Next Article:Newsletter publisher accused of trading scheme.(Albert Budai)(securities fraud)(Brief article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Healthcare Risk Manager's Liability Alert. (News in Brief).(new publication)(Brief Article)
State Supreme Court ruling hailed by speech advocates. (Up Front).(Brief Article)
NEPA backs McGraw-Hill in opposing commodity futures trading commission subpoenas.
MINNESOTA COURT REQUIRES REPORTER DISCLOSURE IN DEFAMATION.
Pennsylvania court restricts lawyer dealings with the press.
A chilling decision.(Editorials)(High court rebuffs neutral reporting privilege)(Editorial)
Public less informed when reporting privilege is crushed.(Columns)(Column)
Sarbanes-Oxley vs. the free press: how the government used business regulations to strong-arm the media.
Details surface in doctor case.(Crime)(The physicians are identified as Eugene surgeons who are under federal investigation over billing practices)
SNL Financial buys Kagan Research from MCG, Tim Baskerville becomes JupiterResearch CEO.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles