Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,491,363 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Court says charter cities can't skimp on public projects. (Law).


OVERTURNING a 70-year exemption, a three-judge panel of the 2nd Appellate District has ruled that more than 100 charter cities, including 18 in Los Angeles County, must pay the state's prevailing wage on public work projects.

Many of the large charter cities, like Los Angeles, already pay prevailing wages. But Bob Balgenorth, president of the AFL-CIO's State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, said the ruling is a long overdue guarantee for all construction workers.

"We're just elated," he said. "Construction workers will now get a decent wage."

The case involved the 1998 construction of a $10 million animal shelter and headquarters for the L.A. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals cruelty to animals n. the crime of inflicting physical pain, suffering or death on an animal, usually a tame one, beyond necessity for normal discipline. It can include neglect that is so monstrous (withholding food and water) that the animal has suffered, died or been put in imminent danger of death. (See: cruelty) in Long Beach.

Upon review, the state's Department of Indistrial Relations determined that the shelter was a "public work" that was not exempt from paying the prevailing wage because it is a charter city, the ruling says.

Long Beach, along with 44 other charter cities, petitioned the L.A. Superior Court to determine labor code law as it applied to the shelter. After the lower court ruled for the cities, the DIR and the State Building and Construction Trades Council appealed.

Appellate Judge Earl Johnson reversed the ruling in the July 14 ruling.

Dan Murphy, the Long Beach city lawyer who argued the case, said he plans to petition the California Supreme Court in August. He said several other rulings have found that prevailing wage issues in public works is not a statewide concern.
COPYRIGHT 2003 CBJ, L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:wages on public work projects case
Comment:Court says charter cities can't skimp on public projects. (Law).(wages on public work projects case)
Author:Bronstad, Amanda
Publication:Los Angeles Business Journal
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 21, 2003
Words:249
Previous Article:Attorneys flee entertainment firm. (Up Front).(seven partners have left Berkowitz & Black PC)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Arter closes. (Law).(Arter & Hadden LLP)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Activists decry court ruling striking down L.A. Minority business policy.
JURY: MTA TAKEN FOR RIDE PANEL FINDS FIRM'S BILLS FRAUDULENT.(News)
City denies union pay claims.
School building plan has hardhats furious.
Contingent attorney's fees.(Court Decisions)
No religious exemption for Catholic Charities, says California court.
A solid foundation in school construction law: over the past year, a number of decisions have been issued by California and federal courts that have...
LOCKYER BACKS CITY ON MINE SUIT SUPPORTS ACTION AGAINST CEMEX INC.(News)
Prevailing wage law in public and private sectors.(Inside Construction & Design)
Stuart Jackson comes in with a clean sweep.(PROFILE OF THE WEEK: Stuart Jackson, Associate attorney, Maidman & Mittelman)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles