Court orders DOE to take nuclear fuel.By law, the Department of Energy has "an unconditional obligation" to begin disposing of high-level radioactive waste Noun 1. high-level radioactive waste - radioactive waste that left in a nuclear reactor after the nuclear fuel has been consumed radioactive waste - useless radioactive materials that are left after some laboratory or commercial process is completed and used fuel from commercial power reactors by Jan. 31, 1998, or so ruled the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States). Circuit last year. Shortly after that ruling, however, DOE notified utilities and state officials that it could not meet the deadline, largely because it lacked an approved site for long-term waste storage, such as the Yucca Mountain Yucca Mountain, mountain in the SW Nevada desert about 100 mi (161 km) northwest of Las Vegas. It is the proposed site of a Dept. of Energy (DOE) repository for up to 77,000 metric tons of nuclear waste (including commercial and defense spent fuel and high-level facility (SN: 11/1/97, p. 277). Indeed, the agency argues that this nuclear repository can't accept wastes for at least another 12 years. Meanwhile, the utilities, which have been anteing up billions of dollars to cover the expected costs of DOE's disposal of their wastes, have been running out of space in which to store used fuel. So earlier this year, the utilities returned to court to challenge the legality le·gal·i·ty n. pl. le·gal·i·ties 1. The state or quality of being legal; lawfulness. 2. Adherence to or observance of the law. 3. A requirement enjoined by law. Often used in the plural. of DOE's stalling. On Nov. 14, the appellate court A court having jurisdiction to review decisions of a trial-level or other lower court. An unsuccessful party in a lawsuit must file an appeal with an appellate court in order to have the decision reviewed. again found for the utilities, saying that DOE's lack-of-storage argument was insufficient grounds for reneging on its contractual obligations. In fact, the court noted that far from being unable to accept wastes, the agency was already routinely doing that for 41 other countries. The court also ruled that there are means under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act for utilities to find remedies for any waste-holding costs they incur after Jan. 31. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion