Court dismisses massive tax-shelter fraud case.A Texas district court dismissed claims against Pannell Kerr Forster (PKF PKF Peace Keeping Force PKF Pannell Kerr Foster (accounting firm) PKF Park Falls, Wisconsin (Airport Code) ) and Alexander Grant & Co. in a suit alleging one of the largest tax-shelter frauds ever perpetrated. Investors in Hillcrest Securities Corp. and Hillcrest Equities, Inc. filed suit against the accounting firms for $800 million in actual damages and $100 million in punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. . The suit was based on the investors' discovery that Hillcrest had traded with Edward Markowitz, who allegedly created millions of dollars in fraudulent income tax deductions through sham and nonexistent non·ex·is·tence n. 1. The condition of not existing. 2. Something that does not exist. non securities and futures contract Futures Contract An exchange traded agreement to buy or sell a particular type and grade of commodity for delivery at an agreed upon place and time in the future. Futures contracts are transferable between parties. transactions. PKF and Grant had prepared tax returns and tax opinions for Hillcrest. The investors claimed PKF and Grant had prepared documents purporting the existence of transactions that never occurred and had continued to misrepresent mis·rep·re·sent tr.v. mis·rep·re·sent·ed, mis·rep·re·sent·ing, mis·rep·re·sents 1. To give an incorrect or misleading representation of. 2. Hillerest's investments to investors even after becoming aware of Markowitz's alleged fraud. The accounting firms argued the investors' claims were barred by the statute of limitations A type of federal or state law that restricts the time within which legal proceedings may be brought. Statutes of limitations, which date back to early Roman Law, are a fundamental part of European and U.S. law. . They cited a May 10, 1984, Wall Street Journal article reporting the tax fraud allegations against Markowitz, which Hillcrest mailed to all of its investors. The court found this sufficient notice to investors of Markowitz's alleged fraud, ruling the statute of limitations began to run on May 11, 1984. Consequently, investors' actions brought four years later were barred by the statute of limitations. (Richard Dodson, et. al. v. Hillcrest Securities Corp. et. al., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Cause no. H-88-1693) |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion