Court dismisses challenge to Bar ethics opinion.A lawsuit challenging a Florida Bar The Florida Bar is the mandatory state bar association for the state of Florida. It is the third largest such bar association in the United States. Its duties include the regulation and discipline of attorneys. ethics ethics, in philosophy, the study and evaluation of human conduct in the light of moral principles. Moral principles may be viewed either as the standard of conduct that individuals have constructed for themselves or as the body of obligations and duties that a opinion has been dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court, with two justices saying the issue should be reviewed by a Bar rules committee and then possibly sent back to the court. During oral arguments on October 4, justices questioned whether the dispute over Advisory Ethics Opinion 93-4 was properly before them or should have been heard in a different venue first. (See story on page 17 in the November 1 News.) The challenge was brought by Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., a Miami-based law firm. The ethics opinion held that an employment agreement the firm required associates and partners to sign was unethical unethical said of conduct not conforming with professional ethics. . It required those lawyers, if they left, to pay the firm 50 percent of fees they earned from firm clients who went with them for two years, and perhaps longer in some cases. The firm attempted to enforce the agreement against a departing partner, and the Bar filed a grievance griev·ance n. 1. a. An actual or supposed circumstance regarded as just cause for complaint. b. A complaint or protestation based on such a circumstance. See Synonyms at injustice. 2. case. The firm filed a federal lawsuit to stop the Bar, and the two sides then agreed to drop the lawsuit and grievance and seek clarification from the court. But justices said during the oral arguments they would prefer the issue reach them conventionally, after the issues and facts were determined elsewhere. The court's November 9 order said: "After further consideration, we have determined that we should decline to exercise jurisdiction. Therefore, the petition is dismissed." Six justices concurred in that per curiam [Latin, By the court.] A phrase used to distinguish an opinion of the whole court from an opinion written by any one judge. Sometimes per curiam signifies an opinion written by the chief justice or presiding judge; it can also refer to a brief oral announcement ruling, and the seventh, Justice Harry Lee Anstead Harry Lee Anstead has been a Justice of the Florida Supreme Court since 1994, and he served as Chief Justice from July 1, 2002 until June 30, 2004. Prior to his appointment to the Florida Supreme Court by Governor Lawton Chiles, Anstead served as a judge on Florida's Fourth concurred with a separate opinion in which Justice Barbara Pariente Barbara Joan Pariente (born 1948) is an attorney and jurist from Florida. She was chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court from July 1, 2004, until June 30, 2006. Pariente is the second woman to hold the position of chief justice and has served on the court since 1997. also concurred. Anstead said the issue should be referred to the appropriate rules committee, "and the outcome of that debate would be a proper subject for review by this court, regardless of whether a rule change is recommended." The court acted in The Florida Bar Re: Becker & Poliakaff, P.A., case no. SC97130. |
|
||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion