Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Court Decisions Raise Important Questions for Travel Agents.


Business/Travel Editors & Legal Writers

LOS LOS Length of stay, see there  ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 23, 2002

Two federal class actions are proceeding in a way that may force travel agents to make important decisions, court records show. In one case in federal district court in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. , California, "Albany Travel Co. v. Orbitz, LLC (Logical Link Control) See "LANs" under data link protocol.

LLC - Logical Link Control
," the court denied a motion by Orbitz, a website owned by five airlines that sells airline tickets, to dismiss a complaint alleging that it is part of a scheme by airlines to take over the distribution of tickets. The case seeks billions of dollars in damages as well as a court order dissolving dis·solve  
v. dis·solved, dis·solv·ing, dis·solves

v.tr.
1. To cause to pass into solution: dissolve salt in water.

2.
 Orbitz. In the other case in federal district court in North Carolina North Carolina, state in the SE United States. It is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean (E), South Carolina and Georgia (S), Tennessee (W), and Virginia (N). Facts and Figures


Area, 52,586 sq mi (136,198 sq km). Pop.
, "Hall v. United Air Lines," the court recently granted a motion to allow plaintiffs to go forward as a class action rather than sue individually.

Each lawsuit concerns the elimination of commissions for airline tickets, but approaches the issue in a different way. Plaintiffs in "Albany Travel" allege To state, recite, assert, or charge the existence of particular facts in a Pleading or an indictment; to make an allegation.


allege v.
 that various airlines each decided to eliminate commissions as part of their scheme to dominate the distribution of airline tickets through Orbitz. Plaintiffs in "Hall" allege that airlines expressly agreed amongst themselves to eliminate commissions.

"The two cases are based on fundamentally different theories, and we believe ours is a tight fit with the evidence," said Maxwell Blecher of Blecher & Collins, a Los Angeles law firm with extensive antitrust Antitrust

The antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and marketing. They prohibit a variety of practices that restrain trade.
 experience, lead counsel for the plaintiffs in "Albany Travel."

The court in "Albany Travel" will soon decide whether plaintiffs should be allowed to proceed as a class, and the "Albany Travel" plaintiffs expect that they will be allowed to do so as the class in "Hall" was. Travel agents therefore should be prepared to choose to which class they wish to belong: the class in "Albany Travel v. Orbitz" or the class in "Hall v. United Air Lines," Blecher indicated.

"If `Hall' fails at trial or on appeal for lack of compelling evidence of an agreement to eliminate or reduce commissions, the agent selecting that case may well be foreclosed by law from later participating in the `Albany Travel' case with its lower proof requirement. So travel agents should choose carefully when deciding which class to join," said Blecher.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 23, 2002
Words:371
Previous Article:ADVISORY/Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Dedicates Largest Environmental Project Ever Undertaken by the Agency.
Next Article:Silicon Valley Author Jean Hollands Appears on Oxygen Network's ``Candice Bergen Checks It Out''.



Related Articles
Effect of the Supreme Court's decision in INDOPCO.
Court Revives Suits Challenging MONY, Guardian Sales Tactics.
Court: Rape victim can sue landlord.
Raising constitutional doubts.
Hourly per-diem allowance is a question of fact.
Employee or independent contractor?
Ill wind blows through crop suit.
Catch the High Court's eye with a compelling petition.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles