Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,718,184 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Corrective action for incorrect plan distributions.


Letter Ruling 9633041 dealt with the correction of a plan distribution error, and the tax treatment of that correction. The position taken by the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  is rather startling star·tle  
v. star·tled, star·tling, star·tles

v.tr.
1. To cause to make a quick involuntary movement or start.

2. To alarm, frighten, or surprise suddenly. See Synonyms at frighten.
, given its concerns about self-correction.

In 1992, a participant received a full distribution from the two employer plans in which he participated, Plan Y (a money purchase plan) and Plan X (a profit-sharing plan Profit-Sharing Plan

A plan that gives employees a share in the profits of the company. Each employee receives into an account, a percentage of those profits based on their earnings. Also known as "deferred profit-sharing plan" or "DPSP".
). The total distributions, approximately $165,000, were rolled over into five individual retirement accounts (IRAs).

In 1994, the plan administrator discovered that the participant had actually received $14,000 too much from Y and had not received $4,600 of interest that had accrued to him in his final plan year in X.

The employer contacted the participant and asked for the $14,000 back. The participant agreed to return the $14,000, but asked the Service about the tax consequences of taking the amount out of his IRA Ira, in the Bible
Ira (ī`rə), in the Bible.

1 Chief officer of David.

2,

3 Two of David's guard.
IRA, abbreviation
IRA.
. He also asked if the correction distribution would affect the original lump-sum distribution Lump-Sum Distribution

A one time payment for the entire amount due, rather than breaking payments into smaller installments. Some lump-sum distributions receive special tax treatment.
 treatment, and if the remaining $4,600 in X could be rolled over into an IRA.

The Good News

The IRS ruled that X's failure to distribute the $4,600 amount remaining did not interfere with the participant's right to roll over the original amount to an IRA. The Service cited Rev. Ruls. 83-57 and 69-190 as precedent for this treatment.

The Bad News

The IRS also stated that the excess $14,000 from Y was never eligible for a rollover and was an "excess contribution" to the IRA. The Service stated that the $14,000 should have been included in the participant's income in 1992, and that the employee should have been paying a 6% excise tax Excise Tax

1. An indirect tax charged on the sale of a particular good.

2. A penalty tax applied to ineligible transactions in retirement accounts. This penalty is assessed by and paid to the IRS.

Notes:
1.
 under Sec. 4973(a) for each year since then for the excess contribution.

The IRS softened the blow by ruling that the earnings on the excess $14,000 would not be taxable to the individual until actually distributed. Furthermore, the Service did not suggest that the earnings had to be distributed immediately. Noting that earnings on excess amounts are not included in the definition of excess amounts, the IRS ruled the excess $14,000 would not be subject to the early withdrawal penalty exercise tax under Sec. 72(t)(1) when distributed from the IRA. The earnings on that amount, however, would be subject to income and excise taxes when distributed from the IRA.

On the status of the IRAs, the Service concluded that subsequent events, such as excess contributions, may affect an IRA's tax treatment, but not its underlying validity. Thus, neither the IRA's acceptance of the $14,000 amount, nor the corrective distribution of that amount, would affect the status of the IRA.

From Peter I. Elinsky, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) ., and Karen M. Field, J.D., Washington, D.C.
COPYRIGHT 1997 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Field, Karen M.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Jun 1, 1997
Words:463
Previous Article:Adoption credit and assistance exclusion.
Next Article:Excess IRA contributions increasing taxpayer's basis. (individual retirement accounts)
Topics:



Related Articles
Playing roulette with hazardous waste.
IRS clarifies tax treatment of Sec. 415 corrective distributions.
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993; Voluntary Compliance Resolution program; fiduciary responsibilities; distribution rules; excise taxes. (Current...
Roth IRAs.
New Guidelines for Writing Plans of Correction.(Brief Article)
PROBE ORDERED IN CHILD'S DEATH.(News)
Pacific Northwest PIMA Fall Conference 2002.(PIMA Association News)
Case study: Reality Based Scheduling; Improving customer satisfaction and agent job satisfaction.(Advertisement)
Case study: Reality Based Scheduling; Improving customer satisfaction and agent job satisfaction.(Advertisement)
How efficient is your mold maintenance? Part two.(Mold Shop)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles