Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,581,114 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Corrections.


In "Longterm Follow-Up of Residents of the Three Mile Island Accident For details on this station, see .

The Three Mile Island accident was the most significant in the history of the American commercial nuclear power generating industry. It resulted, however, in no deaths or injuries to plant workers or members of the nearby community.
 Area: 1979-1998" [EHP EHP
abbr.
1. effective horsepower

2. electric horsepower
 111:341-348 (2003)]) Talbott et al. attributed a statement to Maureen Hatch through a reference that was incorrect and would like to correct the error. In addition, there was an incorrect reference to one of her works that appeared several times.

On page 342 (second column, line 18 of the second paragraph), the Hatch et al. reference (Hatch et al. 1991) should not have been included; the corrected sentence appears below:
   Additionally, individual exposures were not
   known but estimated. Several other researchers
   indicated that the exposures may have been
   several orders of magnitude larger than originally
   estimated (Wing and Richardson 2000).


Also, Talbott et al. (2003) incorrectly referenced "Hatch et al. 1991" throughout their paper; the correct reference is as follows:

Hatch MC, Beyea J, Nieves JW, Susser M. 1990. Cancer Near the Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant: Radiation Emissions. Am J Epidemiol 132(3):397-412.

Thus, "Hatch et al. 1991" should be replaced with "Hatch et al. 1990" throughout the text of Talbott et al.'s paper (Talbott et al. 2003); the specific locations are as follows: a) page 341, second column, last paragraph; b) page 341, third column, second paragraph; c) page 342, second column, second paragraph; d) page 343, first column, third paragraph; e) page 343, second column, first line; and f) page 347, second column, third paragraph.

The authors regret the errors.

In the March Focus article "The Earth's Open Wounds: Abandoned and Orphaned or·phan  
n.
1.
a. A child whose parents are dead.

b. A child who has been deprived of parental care and has not been adopted.

2. A young animal without a mother.

3.
 Mines" [EHP 111:A154-A161 (2003)], EHP incorrectly characterized char·ac·ter·ize  
tr.v. character·ized, character·iz·ing, character·iz·es
1. To describe the qualities or peculiarities of: characterized the warden as ruthless.

2.
 states' receipt of funding under the U.S. Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Reclamation

A claim for the right to return or the right to demand the return of a security that has been previously accepted as a result of bad delivery or other irregularities in the delivery and settlement process.
 Act (SMCRA SMCRA Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 ) of 1977 by saying that the states of New Mexico New Mexico, state in the SW United States. At its northwestern corner are the so-called Four Corners, where Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah meet at right angles; New Mexico is also bordered by Oklahoma (NE), Texas (E, S), and Mexico (S). , Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Utah, and Washington receive SMCRA funds. In fact, although these states are eligible to receive SMCRA funds, they may or may not have applied for them. EHP regrets the error.
COPYRIGHT 2003 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Environmental Health Perspectives
Date:Jul 1, 2003
Words:318
Previous Article:Communication in emergencies: response.(Correspondence)
Next Article:WHO names top 10 health risks.(International Health)



Related Articles
Playing hardball with criminals. (corrections spending)(includes related articles on juvenile corrections, prison construction and alternatives to...
Rev. Proc. 98-22, relating to the employee plans compliance resolution system. (IRS Revenue Procedure 98-22)
New Guidelines for Writing Plans of Correction.(Brief Article)
Comparison of the NIST and NPL Air Kerma Standards Used for X-Ray Measurements Between 10 kV and 80 kV.
OK SOUGHT FOR INMATE FACILITY.(NEWS)(Statistical Data Included)
STATE LOOKS ELSEWHERE FOR NEXT PRISON : CALIFORNIA CITY LOSES BIDDING FOR PRIVATE CORRECTIONS CENTER.(NEWS)
BID TO BUILD CALIFORNIA CITY PRISON NIXED.(NEWS)
Community corrections and community policing: a perfect match.
Get back on track: an IRS program helps correct retirement plan defects so tax benefits are not lost.
Is IRS EPCRS self-correction program working for you?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles