Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,604,530 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Correction to: "the FA Master Gunner and reset of the redeployed FA battalion".


In my column in the January-February 2007 edition, I made an incorrect statement when recommending how to rate Master Gunners. In the article, I suggested the following rating scheme: the command sergeant major (CSM CSM - ["CSM - A Distributed Programming Language", S. Zhongxiu et al, IEEE Trans Soft Eng SE-13(4):497-500 (Apr 1987)]. ) rate the Master Gunner and the S3 senior rate the Master Gunner with the battalion commander reviewing the efficiency report. I since have learned that my proposed rating scheme conflicts with new Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 Military Evaluations System because the rater (battalion CSM) must be supervised by the senior rater (in this case, the S3, who is not the CSM's rater). This new requirement only was "recommended" under the old AR 623-205.

I asked the Human Resources Command (HRC HRC Human Rights Campaign
HRC Human Rights Council (UN)
HRC Human Rights Commission
HRC Hard Rock Cafe
HRC Hillary Rodham Clinton (democratic senator/presidential candidate; former first lady) 
) evaluation gurus to look at my rating proposal and give me feedback. Bottom line up front: they said that using the rating chain I suggested could lead to Inspector General (IG) complaints or NCO NCO
abbr.
noncommissioned officer


NCO noncommissioned officer

NCO n abbr (Mil) (= noncommissioned officer) → Uffz. 
 evaluation report (NCOER NCOER Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report ) appeals because the rating chain is not in accordance with AR 623-3. So, I must ask you to comply with the AR--not follow my proposed rating scheme.

That having been said, I believe the battalion CSM should rate the Master Gunner, when possible (mission dependent). I rate the Field Artillery Master Gunner and the Chief of Field Artillery is his senior rater. Of course, if the CSM rates the Master Gunner and the battalion commander senior rates him, then the NCOER will have to go outside the battalion for review. As part of empowering the Master Gunner, it might be worth it to institute that rating scheme, which complies with AR 623-3.

I stand behind the rest of my comments in the article, such as battalion commanders' selecting the right NCOs to be their Master Gunners--and not necessarily the most senior Military Occupational Specialty A Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) is a job classification in use in the United States Army and Marine Corps. The occupational specialty system uses a system of letters and numbers to identify general and specific jobs of military personnel.  (MOS (1) (Metal Oxide Semiconductor) See MOSFET.

(2) (Mean Opinion Score) The quality of a digitized voice line. It is a subjective measurement that is derived entirely by people listening to the calls and scoring the results from
) 13B Cannon Crewmember or 13M Multiple-Launch Rocket System (MLRS MLRS Multiple Launch Rocket System (US DoD)
MLRS Multiple Launcher Rocket System
MLRS Marine Corps Long-Range Study (US DoD) 
) Crewmember sergeants first class (SFCs) in the battalions. I also am passionate about units "empowering" their Master Gunners.

As you know, due to the current fight, our Master Gunners are performing many other duties as Pentathletes in Afghanistan and Iraq--duties that are helping to make a difference in the War on Terrorism Terrorist acts and the threat of Terrorism have occupied the various law enforcement agencies in the U.S. government for many years. The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, as amended by the usa patriot act  (WOT). However, staying current on their FA skill sets is challenging for them.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Our Master Gunners, as FA experts, are extremely important to the FA, especially now. Their ability to help FA units certify and qualify their personnel after redeploying is critical.

I apologize for any confusion I may have caused with my recommended rating scheme and thank the G1 for calling my mistake to my attention.

CSM William E. High

CSM of the FA, Fort Sill, OK
COPYRIGHT 2007 U.S. Field Artillery Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Incoming
Author:High, William E.
Publication:FA Journal
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Mar 1, 2007
Words:437
Previous Article:History as prologue--beginning of a new era.
Next Article:2007 Fires Seminar--5-7 June; "Artillery strong: evolving fires".
Topics:



Related Articles
Federal rules may limit off-reservation casinos.
Downhill from disaster?
DOZER, NOT DYNAMITE, EASES WHALE'S FINAL PASSAGE.
GO Zone depreciation.
Planning for distributions of employer securities.
Nonspouse beneficiary meets PPA '06 rollover requirements.
Axa Distributors LLC.
History of Field Artillery magazine: pointing the way to the future.
Reset--rebuilding FA core competencies for future full-spectrum operations.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles