Correction: Fitch Rates Napa-Vallejo Waste Mgt Auth, CA Rev Bonds 'A-'.
AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 15, 2004
(This is an amended version of a press release originally issued on May 21, 2004. The issuer has modified the proposed rate and bond covenants Bond covenant
A contractual provision in a bond indenture. A positive covenant requires certain actions, and a negative covenant limits certain actions. for the 2004 bonds, and those changes are reflected in this amended release.)
Fitch Ratings Fitch Ratings
An international rating agency for financial institutions, insurance companies, and corporate, sovereign, and municipal debt. Fitch Ratings has headquarters in New York and London and is wholly owned by FIMALAC of Paris. assigns an 'A-' rating to the Napa-Vallejo Waste Management Authority, California's (the authority) $9.84 million 2004 revenue refunding bonds refunding bond
A bond that is issued for the purpose of retiring an outstanding bond. Issuers refund bond issues to reduce financing costs, eliminate covenants, and alter maturities. See also crossover refunding bonds, prerefunding. (solid waste transfer facility project). The 2004 bonds are scheduled to sell the week of June 21 through Piper Jaffray Piper Jaffray & Co. (NYSE: PJC), often shortened to just Piper Jaffray or PiperJaffray, is a U.S. middle-market investment banking firm based in Minneapolis, Minnesota and is a focused on delivering financial advice, investment products and transaction execution & Co.
The 2004 bonds are special obligations of the authority, payable from net revenues derived from the operation of a solid waste transfer facility located in Napa County, California “Napa Valley” redirects here. For the wine country, see Napa Valley (Wine).
Napa County is a county located north of the San Francisco Bay Area in the U.S. state of California. It is part of the Napa, California Metropolitan Statistical Area. (the facility). Bond proceeds will be used to refund the outstanding 1994 revenue bonds for debt service savings, and pay costs of issuance. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The 'A-' rating reflects the authority's substantial cash reserves Cash reserves
See: Cash investments
Investment funds that are held in short-term assets such as Treasury bills and certificates of deposit until more permanent investment opportunities are available. , reduced landfill closure liability, minimal capital needs, and increasing tonnage amounts processed at the facility. Also incorporated into the rating is a string of operating losses operating loss
The excess of operating expenses over revenue. As with operating income, operating losses exclude revenues and expenses from operations that are not considered a regular part of the business. Also called deficit. Compare operating income. over the past several years, as the authority has attempted to reduce large cash reserve amounts. Provision for a supplemental reserve, as well as existing reserves, should limit the potential for interruption of revenues in case of a bankruptcy filing by a private disposal company.
Moderate operating losses have occurred in four of the past five fiscal years. Authority officials report that these losses were planned to reduce sizable operating reserves In power systems, the operating reserve is the generating capacity available to the system operator within a short interval of time to meet demand in case a generator is lost or there is another disruption to the supply. . For fiscal 2003, the $7.8 million reported in net income resulted from a $9.6 million adjustment in estimated landfill closure and postclosure costs; otherwise the authority would have posted a net loss of $1.8 million. Unrestricted cash and investments totaled $3.5 million in fiscal 2003, down from $7 million the prior year.
Authority operations occur primarily at the facility, which serves four area governments and individual haulers. Trash that is collected at the facility is transported by truck to a landfill located in nearby Contra Costa Contra Costa can refer to:
The primary contractual customers of the facility are Napa County and the cities of Napa, Vallejo, and American Canyon. These customers combined accounted for roughly 60% of total waste volume in fiscal 2003, down from 75% in fiscal 1996. The remaining volume comes from the spot waste market, which increased from 25% of total tonnage eight years ago to more than 40% today. Authority officials cite the competitive tipping fee of $54 per ton and high transportation costs to other disposal sites as the primary reasons for the growing 'self-haul' volume. Overall, tonnage processed at the facility has increased more than 8% annually since fiscal 1999, including a 16% jump in fiscal 2003.
The primary credit concern is the potential for interruption of revenue streams to the authority if a private disposal company files for bankruptcy protection. With the exception of the City of Napa, private companies collect customer payments on behalf of the contractual customers and remit them to the authority. A supplemental reserve, to be maintained in an amount no less than 1.0 times (x) the succeeding year's debt service requirement, largely mitigates this concern. The proposed rate and bond covenants for the 2004 bonds are identical to the 1994 covenants; both the rate covenant Rate covenant
A provision governing a municipal revenue project financed by a revenue bond issue, which establishes the rates to be charged users of the new facility.
rate covenant and the additional bonds test Additional bonds test
A test for ensuring that bond issuers can meet the debt service requirements of issuing any new additional bonds.
additional bonds test require 1.25x coverage.