Correction, vol. 8, no. 12. (News & Notes).In the article "Induction of Inflammation by West Nile virus Capsid capsid /cap·sid/ (kap´sid) the shell of protein that protects the nucleic acid of a virus; it is composed of structural units, or capsomers. cap·sid (k p through the Caspase-9 Apoptotic Pathway" by Joo-Sung Yang,
et al., errors occurred in the Figure 5 caption on page 1384: delta
symbols inadvertantly dropped or were replaced by the letter
"d." The corrected caption appears below and online
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vo18no12/02-0224-G5.htm.Figure 5. Apoptosis determining domain in WNV-Cp gene. a, Schematic diagram of pcWNV-Cp-DJY, pcWNV-CpWT, and pcWNVCp[DELTA]3'constructs. b, Immunoprecipitation immunoprecipitation /im·mu·no·pre·cip·i·ta·tion/ (-pre-sip?i-ta´shun) precipitation resulting from interaction of specific antibody and antigen. im·mu·no·pre·cip·i·ta·tion ( m of in vitro
translated protein from pcWNV-Cp-DJY (Cp-DJY), pcWNV-CpWT (CpWT), and
pcWNVCp-3'(Cp[DELTA]3') plasmids. As a negative control,
pcDNA3.1 in vitro translated supernatants were analyzed, c, Colorimetric
caspase-3 activity assay using pcWNV-Cp-DJY (Cp-DJY), pcWNV-CpWT (CpWT),
or pcWNV-Cp 3'(Cp[DELTA]3') plasmid-transfected cells. d, The
cell lysates ly·sate (l![]() s t )n. were assayed for caspase-9-like activity, and the
pcDNA3.1-transfected cell lysate was used as the negative control, e,
Inhibition of WNV-Cp-induced apoptosis by a dominant negative (DN)
caspase-9 plasmid (DN Casp9) was assayed with equal amount of cell
lysates from co-transfection of pcWNV-Cp-DJY (Cp-DJY) or pcWNV-CpWT
(CpWT); an expression level of pro-caspase-9 cleavage products (35-37
kDa) was compared to 3'-terminal deletion mutant,
pcWNV-Cp[DELTA]3'(Cp[DELTA]3') and pcDNA3.1 by Western blot
analysis with anti-human caspase-9 mAb.Correction Vol. 8, No. 12 In the article, "Vector Competence of California Mosquitoes for West Nile virus" by Laura B. Goddard et al., errors occurred in the table on page 1387. The corrected table appears below and online at http ://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vo18no12/02-0536.htm. We regret any confusion these errors may have caused.
Table 2. Infection and transmission rates for California mosquito
species orally infected with [10.sup.7-1 [+ or -] 0.1] PFU/mL of
West Nile virus (WNV)
Day when
transmission
Species Source by county was attempted No. tested
Culex tarsalis Yolo 7 30
14 1
Kern 7 15
14 35
Riverside 7 49
14 55
Cx. pipiens Kern 7 50
quinquefasciatus 14 50
Riverside 7 60
14 60
Orange 14 58
Cx. p. pipiens Shasta 7 45
14 50
Cx. stigmatosoma San Bernardino 7 17
14 31
Cx. erythrothorax Orange 7 15
14 48
Riverside 7 15
14 25
Ochlerotatus dorsalis San Luis Obispo 7 30
14 29
Oc. melanimon Kern 7 50
14 60
Oc. sierrensis Lake 7 40
14 50
Aedes vexans Riverside 14 22
Culiseta inornata Kern 14 28
Infection Transmission
Species Source by county rate (a) rate (b)
Culex tarsalis Yolo 87 60
100 100
Kern 93 40
74 60
Riverside 94 10
85 62
Cx. pipiens Kern 86 4
quinquefasciatus 58 52
Riverside 8 0
13 2
Orange 28 19
Cx. p. pipiens Shasta 80 9
66 36
Cx. stigmatosoma San Bernardino 100 0
100 71
Cx. erythrothorax Orange 67 0
77 19
Riverside 100 33
100 64
Ochlerotatus dorsalis San Luis Obispo 50 13
41 34
Oc. melanimon Kern 46 18
48 20
Oc. sierrensis Lake 5 3
14 6
Aedes vexans Riverside 32 23
Culiseta inornata Kern 75 21
(a) Percent of mosquito bodies positive for WNV.
(b) Percent of transmission attempts positive for WNV.
|
|
||||||||||||||

p
m
s
t
)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion