Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,815,112 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Corporation's and Shareholder's Reasonable Reliance on Tax Adviser Precluded Negligence Penalty.


S owns all the stock of S-M, a C corporation. S-M retails and wholesales optical merchandise and its business requires that its salespeople sales·peo·ple  
pl.n.
Persons who are employed to sell merchandise in a store or in a designated territory.
 travel frequently. S-M generally requires that these salespeople pay their own business expenses and get reimbursed from S-M.

S-M and S use the same accounting firm, and have for the past 52 years. The firm reviews S-M's records and prepares its financial statements and tax returns; it also prepares S's personal returns.

For 1993-1995, S-M claimed deductions totaling approximately $4.5 million. The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  disallowed approximately $180,000 of this amount for lack of substantiation. This disallowance dis·al·low  
tr.v. dis·al·lowed, dis·al·low·ing, dis·al·lows
1. To refuse to allow: "[The government]
 meant that S received constructive dividends constructive dividend

A corporate payment to a stockholder that is characterized by the Internal Revenue Service as a dividend distribution even though the corporation calls it something else.
 for this amount.

In addition, in 1993, when he was diagnosed with cancer, S stopped keeping an expense log for his auto travel. However, S-M continued to pay S an expense allowance after he stopped traveling.

The Service determined that S's underpayments stemming from all these income adjustments were due to negligence and assessed accuracy-related penalties under Sec. 6662(a). S challenged these penalties. The Tax Court holds for S, ruling that he reasonably relied on his tax adviser and was therefore not negligent negligent adj., adv. careless in not fulfilling responsibility. (See: negligence) .

We believe that both S-M and S have disproved the IRS's determination of negligence. A taxpayer is not negligent when he relies reasonably on a tax adviser for tax advice.

Reasonable reliance occurs when (1) the adviser has sufficient expertise to justify reliance, (2) the taxpayer provides necessary and accurate information to the adviser and (3) the taxpayer actually relies in good faith on the adviser's judgment. Such is the case here. S is an elderly man, and both he and S-M relied reasonably on their longtime long·time  
adj.
Having existed or persisted for a long time: a longtime friend; a longtime resident of Detroit.


longtime
Adjective
 accounting firm to prepare their tax returns correctly. Although the Service ultimately disallowed a small portion of S-M's deductions as unsubstantiated, we do not believe that S-M was negligent in claiming those deductions. Nor do we believe that $ was negligent when he failed to report the dividends that resulted from the-IRS's disallowance of those deductions, or the interest that S received from S-M.

SHANE MICHAEL OPTICAL, CO., TC MEMO MEMO Memorandum
MEMO Medicines Monitoring Unit (University of Dundee)
MEMO Medical Equipment Management Office
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Only
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Operations
MEMO Mental Modeler
 1999-267
COPYRIGHT 1999 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Fiore, Nicholas J.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Nov 1, 1999
Words:347
Previous Article:Bank's Mutual Fund Losses Were Not Ordinary Losses.
Next Article:Delay in Civil Case While Criminal Investigation Was Pending Was Not Ministerial Act.



Related Articles
Highlights of the new taxpayer accuracy-related penalty rules.
Avoiding penalties for failure to pay AMT: computation's complexity may abate penalties for individuals. (alternative minimum tax)
Expert's advice eliminates negligence penalty.(Brief Article)
Prop. regs. heighten the "reasonable basis" standard for return positions.
Can a client rely on his preparer to file an extension?
Reliance on an agent held not to constitute reasonable cause.
When will reliance on a tax adviser avoid an accuracy-related penalty?
When giving advice, experience is key. (tax consultants)
Accuracy-related penalty defenses.
Will a tax opinion still prevent penalties?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles