Corporate Profile for Sultan & Co, dated June 30, 2000.Business Editors --(BUSINESS WIRE) The following Corporate Profile is available for inclusion in your files. News releases for this client are distributed by Business Wire and also become part of the leading databases and online services, including all of the leading Internet-based services. -0-
Published Date: June 30, 2000
Company Name: Sultan & Co.
Address: 550 S. Hope St., 26th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Main Telephone
Number: 213/236-0933
Internet Home
Page Address
(URL) www.sultanonline.com
Chief Executive
Officer: Christina A. Sultan
Chief Financial
Officer: Ira S. Lifland
Investor Relations
Business number: 213/236-0933
E-mail address: csultan@sultanonline.com
Public Relations
Contact: Megan Mandeville
Business number: 213/236-0933
E-mail address: megan@sultanonline.com
Industry: Investigations/Law
Company Description: Sultan SULTAN. The title of the Turkish sovereign and other Mahometan princes. & Co. provides corporate and private investigations to clients worldwide. With offices in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. and New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , the professionals of Sultan & Co. offer over 50 years of cumulative investigative experience. Sultan & Co. is retained by law firms This list of the world's largest law firms by revenue is taken from The Lawyer and The American Lawyer and is ordered by 2006 revenue:[1]
Items of value that are owned by a firm but do not appear on its balance sheet. For example, a trademark or patent may be a firm's most valuable owned asset; yet, it would not appear as such on its balance sheet. , and uncovering fraud and embezzlement embezzlement, wrongful use, for one's own selfish ends, of the property of another when that property has been legally entrusted to one. Such an act was not larceny at common law because larceny was committed only when property was acquired by a "felonious taking," i. . |
|
||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion