Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,879 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Coronary artery claims may push 510(k) device to PMA status.


7549W

Statements in a brochure, press releases and Internet sites regarding screening for coronary artery disease coronary artery disease, condition that results when the coronary arteries are narrowed or occluded, most commonly by atherosclerotic deposits of fibrous and fatty tissue.  overstepped the 510(k) cleared for Imatron's Ultrafast Computed Tomography Computed tomography (CT scan)
X rays are aimed at slices of the body (by rotating equipment) and results are assembled with a computer to give a three-dimensional picture of a structure.
 Scanner, according to a May 4 warning letter to the South San Francisco South San Francisco, city (1990 pop. 54,312), San Mateo co., W Calif.; inc. 1908. South San Francisco has several industrial parks; its manufactures include medical supplies and equipment, foods, paint, paper products, consumer goods, and clothing.  company. Although originally cleared via 510(k), the new intended use sounded more like a PMA PMA (papillary-marginal-attached),
n a system of epidemiologic scoring of periodontal disease devised by Schour and Massler in which the symbols denote the areas involved in gingival inflammation.

PMA Progressive muscular atrophy
 candidate, FDA FDA
abbr.
Food and Drug Administration


FDA,
n.pr See Food and Drug Administration.

FDA,
n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration.
 said.

"Because of the serious nature of a claim related to coronary artery disease, FDA's Office of Device Evaluation would probably require that Imatron obtain approval of a premarket application," the warning letter stated.

FDA said the 510(k) represented the intended use as "to produce cross sectional images...of the human anatomy." The submission added that, like some of its predicate devices, the Scanner also could be used in "clinical situations requiring determination of specific quantitative information," according to the warning letter.

This did not cover specific diagnostic claims, FDA said. The agency referred to a brochure, submitted to CDRH CDRH Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US FDA)  in 1996, containing "explicit diagnostic claims," particularly for coronary artery scanning, along with a press release referencing the use of the coronary artery scan in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's multicenter study on cardiovascular disease progression. Similar claims appeared on Imatron's Web site, along with a link to another Web site for HeartScan Imaging, an Imatron subsidiary, which discussed scanning for coronary artery disease.

The Imatron site also contained claims for "other specific diagnostic capabilities," such as lung and colon screening, plus more links to other Web addresses in the U.S. and elsewhere, with names referring to coronary scanning, FDA said. 510(k), O-L Use, Web
COPYRIGHT 1999 Washington Information Source, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Warning Letter Bulletin
Date:May 17, 1999
Words:267
Previous Article:Retracted language reappears in Emergency Filtration Products Web site.
Next Article:Web page and brochure overstep 510(k) for orthodontic device, warning letter says.



Related Articles
GUIDANT FILES PREMARKET APPROVAL SUPPLEMENT APPLICATION
CDRH UNTITLED LETTERS.
Accutech Orthodontic, Chesapeake, VA.
MEDICAL DEVICES.
CDRH PROMO UNTITLED LETTERS.
Federal Preemption Impacts Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Litigation.(Case study)
Supreme Court rules FDA has exclusive authority to regulate medical devices.
Supreme court ruling sets important precedent for litigation against the medical device industry.(Top of the News)
Supreme Court decision will impact orthopedics: Senate panel questions the industry about relationships with physicians.(NEWS FRONT)
Does Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. Affect You?(Case overview)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles